Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ryan Air


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

I am stuck in Carcassonne in france in 35 degree heat and my Ryan Air flight is delayed because the speed sensor on the plane is broken.

 

The pilot flew into a bird on the way in so our flight will not be leaving.

 

They are flying an alternative plane in so our total departure time delay is expected to be 5 hours.:mad:

 

Am I entitled to any compensation?:rolleyes:

 

By the way, so far the staff have been very helpful.

 

Cheers

 

Kurvaface

Link to post
Share on other sites

Five hours EXTRA holiday...... For NOTHING !

 

Wow! :D

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got reverse thrust problems last month. :D

 

Better safe than sorry.

 

Article 6

Delay

1. When an operating air carrier reasonably expects a flight to be delayed beyond its scheduled time of departure:

(a) for two hours or more in the case of flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or

(b) for three hours or more in the case of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and of all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or

© for four hours or more in the case of all flights not falling under (a) or (b),

passengers shall be offered by the operating air carrier:

(i) the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2); and

(ii) when the reasonably expected time of departure is at least the day after the time of departure previously announced, the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)©; and

(iii) when the delay is at least five hours, the assistance specified in Article 8(1)(a).

2. In any event, the assistance shall be offered within the time limits set out above with respect to each distance bracket.

 

The other bits are here:

 

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air_portal/passenger_rights/doc/2008/q_and_a_en.pdf

 

Keep all receipts. If you are refused any, kick off with the airport manager. Hope the internet connection isn't costing much. :D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... Home at last:D

 

Right, thanks for your replies. Rooster, you need your head checking. Carcassonne airport is a true hole and not somewhere you want to be delayed.:) especially when it's hot!!

 

After my initial post, all the ryanair staff did a dissappearing act. Eventually, once we had been corralled into the departure lounge some hours later, a Francois dished out a notice setting out our rights under Regulation 261/2004 of the European parliament. Having been written by Ryanair, it was typically vague and probably only understandable to Leprecians.

The gist of it was they were meant to provide food + drink etc, phone calls and compenstation. Never happened.

 

I have faxed Ryanair an invitation to rectify my disappointment... I'll let you know what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why I made mention of receipts. Ryanair, I feel, work on the notion that they will only comply under articles 6 & 9 if you bother to go to the trouble of writing in. They will then (only with proof) fulfil their obligations.

 

Your reply will be generic, but might ask you to send in proof of any costs incurred. They know this method is cheaper than simply complying with UK-trumping EU law.

 

The phone call/fax allowance is seldom achieved and certainly not with Ryanair!

 

I am stunned that you were handed out your rights, even if it was their version, O'Leary will go nuts if he finds out!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I and another passenger demanded them. (Since joining CAG I have developed an eye for small-print:))

 

It said on the boarding card to ask for them in the event of a delay, but they came too late because in the departure lounge there was only a drinks machine and we were stuck in there for nearly three hours. There were no Ryanair staff in sight - It was a combination of us being beyond the security barrier and a Sunday evening I think.

 

I'm cool about the delay because it was a technical issue... I'm peeved that Ryanair have clearly put short term profit before customers in this case and they clearly try to make it as difficult as possible for customers to complain because they do not provide a phone number or an e-mail address. They only provide an address in Dublin to write to and an Irish Fax number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ryanair's service is fine in my experience, and amazing since I pay them pratically nothing. When things go wrong...it obviously shows - it's not in their model.

 

Difficult as possible is correct and boy will they attempt to shaft you! It was only a delay in the grand scheme of things - but do follow through your limited rights, even just out of principle!

 

They of course know that the address in Dublin is only useful to ROI nationals. Gits!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.. these little fellas are starting to get me wound up. If you ring the number in the UK they will only give you the fax number in Ireland which is no use to anyone.....which is why they do that of course. So I will do a bit of research.

 

 

 

Name & Registered Office:

RYANAIR UK LIMITED

SATELITE 3

LONDON STANSTED AIRPORT

STANSTED

ESSEX

CM24 1RW

Company No. 01917579

 

spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifStatus: Active

Date of Incorporation: 30/05/1985

 

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Private Limited Company

Nature of Business (SIC(03)):

7499 - Non-trading company

Accounting Reference Date: 31/03

Last Accounts Made Up To: 31/03/2009 (TOTAL EXEMPTION FULL)

Next Accounts Due: 31/12/2010

Last Return Made Up To: 05/10/2008

Next Return Due: 02/11/2009

Last Members List: 05/10/2008

Previous Names:Date of changePrevious Name01/11/1995RYAN AIR UK LIMITED27/06/1985DAWNDELL LIMITEDBranch Details There are no branches associated with this company.Oversea Company Info There are no Oversea Details associated with this company.

System Requirements

Edited by kurvaface
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's slimmed down. Though it does cover your delay.

 

This stuff always reminds me of the scene from the flick 'True Romance' where Christopher Walken does the bit about lies, the man has 18 and the woman 21 or something.

 

What they are doing is telling you everything, yet telling you nothing!

 

Anyway, it's always not their fault and it's designed to sub-consciously make people think that way. Eejits. Their (probably lawful) interpretation anyway.

 

The question is, did you buy extra drinks/food, need to communicate etc, and do you have proof?. (internet costs likely not included in the regs)

 

Ryanair twaddle...LOL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Internet.... was free...I hooked up to the local Wi Fi

 

Food and drink.....I spent about 20 euros and have reciepts.

Parking...... Went over by a day (26 quid) which I had to pay for in cash but don't have a reciept.

 

I have read and re-read that notice they gave us over and over and still can't work out whether they are meant to pay the 250 euros (Possibly 400 euros because the distance is around 1500km) or not.:confused: What do you tink?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they don't have to pay. Maybe I am missing the point, but this is no cancellation; it's a mere delay.

 

I don't think you'll have any luck with the parking either, sorry.

 

Article 8.1(a) is hardly transparent, for me, even if you can state the delay was 5 hours or more, and since you got the return flight (eventually) it wouldn't apply.

 

Delay offers hardly any protection, and I agree with that. :|

 

That's all before the airlines interpretation of it. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what determines a flight cancellation as opposed to a delay. The plane I was going to fly on was still sitting on the ground as we took off in a different one.

 

As for reciepts, I have no problems there. If Ryanair get arsy then I can too:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not an easy answer, it's pratically near impossible. :(

 

They love it.

 

Letters (prelim and LBA to head ofice in Eire - paper trail)

 

Litigation wise, your guess is as good as mine (and I know how truely awful they are!)

 

Satelite 3, Stansted would be your starting point, but they may tell the Court that you have served the cleaners. They appear to lie - but it seems to be allowed! The CAA are a bunch of boobs anyway, just like the CSA (Oh, and the rest of them - I only like the ASA!)

 

They have been taken to task over the wheelchair fiasco - but gawd knows how they did it. (I'd love to know)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, thanks for your replies. Rooster, you need your head checking. Carcassonne airport is a true hole and not somewhere you want to be delayed.:) especially when it's hot!!

It hasn't improved since I was there about 10 years ago then... nothing there at all really.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input Thailand.

 

So it seems Ryanair are just the kind of people I like.

 

I cost Credit solutions ltd way more than they would have ever made from me because they were naughty. I would have palyed ball with them if they had been straight and honest.

 

All Ryanair need to do is respond favourably to my fax and I'll go away quietly and use them again.

 

Enough said:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...