Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
    • Point taken that we should inform new Caggers that the £20 option is there in wrong registration cases.  Well, supposedly there, who knows what the PPCs would do in practice.  Anyway, the option is allegedly there with both the BPA as you say, but also the IPC (I've just checked). However, there's a danger here of baby, bathwater. The two easiest types of cases to win are (a) residential - due to Supremacy of Contract and (b) wrong registration - due to "de minimis".  Indeed until recently we has been boasting that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing. We simply can do nothing about a terrible judge.  The judge seems - I say seems because we haven't had all the details - to have ignored "de minimis",. got fixated on a sign and awarded unreasonable behaviour costs.  A totally bizarre judgement.
    • You mean your witness statement 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Student Residence rip off


Fred Bassett
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter is a resident at a campus in Cardiff University run by a private company - Liberty living.

 

She signed a contract in March for accommodation for 12 months, but at the time, the rent was only agreed for the first 6 months.

 

She now has a new contract to sign. The rent has gone up marginally - about £2 per week, but the nasty bit comes when you realise that Liberty living want to charge 6 months rent over a 5-month period. Apparently, this has been agreed by the University.

 

I think this is appalling. In effect, this will leave her with £72 per month less to live on until February, when she won't have to pay any rent at all.

 

As it happens, she has money in her bank account and me and my wife are helping her out, so she can manage this without a problem, but this really irks me. Liberty living already have a £200 deposit which they were quick to take, but which will take about 4 weeks to pay back at the end of the contract. Now this.

 

Some of the other students in her block just can't afford this and are moving out.

 

Has anyone else experienced something similar? It strikes me that this is just plain wrong. She has a choice I suppose, but for a 19-year old, living away from home, this seems like blackmail.

 

Any suggestions would be welcome.

 

Regards to all.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred,

 

Firstly, you say that your daughters deposit will take around 4 weeks to return on conclusion of her tenancy - is her deposit protected by one of the government deposit protection schemes?

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred,

 

Firstly, you say that your daughters deposit will take around 4 weeks to return on conclusion of her tenancy - is her deposit protected by one of the government deposit protection schemes?

 

TFT

 

Hi TFT, I honestly don't know. All I can remember is that when she did the original paperwork, she was told that this was the length of time it took to get the money back.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TFT, I honestly don't know. All I can remember is that when she did the original paperwork, she was told that this was the length of time it took to get the money back.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

 

Hi Fred,

 

this is an important factor for you to explore because as of April 2007, landlords are legally obliged to protect a tenants deposit in one of these schemes. A failure by a landlord to do so can result in the landlord being liable to pay the tenant three times the original deposit in compensation. Either you or your daughter would have received a certificate for your protected deposit if the landlords have protected it.

 

From what you have said, is it the case thay your daughter will be there for a further period of six months; however, the landlords wish to make that rent payable over 5 months? If so, it is difficult to understand the legal position on the matter without seeing the contract; however, at the very least I would certainly say that it is extremely unreasonable, particularly as your daughter is a student with limited funds.

 

Just returning to the deposit matter, if you cannot find any paperwork you can always check with each scheme as to whether your daughters deposit is registered with them. Don't worry, there are only 3:

 

1) The Deposit Protection Service (The DPS)

0870 707 1707

 

2) Tenancy Deposit Solutions Ltd (TDSL)

020 8275 3260

 

3) The Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS)

0845 226 7837

 

Make sure you check this out as it will save further problems for your daughter and also make sure you don't unfairly lose £200 either.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks TFT. I could post up a copy of the current agreement because she is home this weekend and has bought it with her. The original agreement is back in Cardiff and any other paperwork including, if she has it, the certificate you refer to.

 

I would be astonished if a company working in partnership with Cardiff Uni was breaking the law, but when you hear of other goings on in this country, maybe I shouldn't be.

 

Shall I post up the current agreement?

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and yes, she's there for 6 months but they want to charge the rent for that period over 5. Needless to say, the 'free' month will be at the end, not the beginning.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be astonished if a company working in partnership with Cardiff Uni was breaking the law, but when you hear of other goings on in this country, maybe I shouldn't be.

 

Firstly, don't be astonished that such a thing could happen. I have just graduated from university and my experience is that uni's tend to be pretty naive when it comes to this sort of thing - this is usually why they rely on external partners for areas such as accommodation.

 

Secondly, definately post up the agreement you have and I will have a look. I have got a friend who has just finished his LPC to become a solicitor and luckily residential/commercial tenancy agreements are an area that he has recently covered.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TFT,

 

Here's a copy of the agreement, with personal details and location removed. From looking at it, the deposit does appear to be covered by a guarantee scheme.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

 

TenancyAgreement1.jpg

TenancyAgreement2.jpg

TenancyAgreement3.jpg

TenancyAgreement4.jpg

TenancyAgreement4.jpg

TenancyAgreement5.jpg

TenancyAgreement6.jpg

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred,

 

Ok, the bad news is that the rent payments and dates look contractually fine. Basically, the rent is payable on a five weekly basis and this would make sense from the perspective that the agreement is for 25 weeks so easily divided by 5. Morally and ethically, it could be argued that it is unfair as no doubt it would be easier for your daughter to pay on a monthly basis; however, apart from that I think there is little that could be done.

 

That said, what I would suggest is writing a strong letter to the university. If students are moving out because they cannot manage this arrangement then this is counter productive to the very purpose of university halls.

 

I must say, I totally sympathise because they have your daughter backed in to a corner. If she went out and got herself a normal rented property she would have to pay a new set of fees to the agent; furthermore, like any city Cardiff has its good and bad areas and I am sure you would be far happier with her living in university accommodation rather than anywhere else.

 

I think the only way to win this one is to put pressure on the university and see how they respond.

 

Also, with regards to the deposit, make sure you do check it out. Anyone can say anything in a contract; however, whether they do it or not is another question.

 

A further point with the agreement is that they state a late payment charge of £30 may be payable if the rent is not paid on time. If this ever happens to your daughter this can be challenged like you would challenge a bank charge.

 

I am really sorry that I could not have been of any more assistance. I know its tough being student so understand your daughter's situation very well.

 

All the best,

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred,

 

Ok, the bad news is that the rent payments and dates look contractually fine. Basically, the rent is payable on a five weekly basis and this would make sense from the perspective that the agreement is for 25 weeks so easily divided by 5. Morally and ethically, it could be argued that it is unfair as no doubt it would be easier for your daughter to pay on a monthly basis; however, apart from that I think there is little that could be done.

 

That said, what I would suggest is writing a strong letter to the university. If students are moving out because they cannot manage this arrangement then this is counter productive to the very purpose of university halls.

 

I must say, I totally sympathise because they have your daughter backed in to a corner. If she went out and got herself a normal rented property she would have to pay a new set of fees to the agent; furthermore, like any city Cardiff has its good and bad areas and I am sure you would be far happier with her living in university accommodation rather than anywhere else.

 

I think the only way to win this one is to put pressure on the university and see how they respond.

 

Also, with regards to the deposit, make sure you do check it out. Anyone can say anything in a contract; however, whether they do it or not is another question.

 

A further point with the agreement is that they state a late payment charge of £30 may be payable if the rent is not paid on time. If this ever happens to your daughter this can be challenged like you would challenge a bank charge.

 

I am really sorry that I could not have been of any more assistance. I know its tough being student so understand your daughter's situation very well.

 

All the best,

 

TFT

 

Many thanks for your help TFT. She's not really looking to challenge it because she has enough money in her bank account to cover this. It was me getting out of my pram a bit about what I perceive to be the unfairness of it to a group of people who might well struggle with this. My daughter worked hard before Uni to make sure she had some funds and I give her money each month too, so she is fairly comfortable, but there are others who are definitely not.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhpas playing devil's advocate slightly here, I do agree it is unfair that they have forced your daughter to do this, however it may be partially due to the fact that in the final month of their tenancy the student will probably be looking to rent somewhere else, which would involve paying a deposit and rent in advance, so not having to pay rent in their final month in their current house might be quite a help to some in covering the costs of the deposit on a new place...

 

Just speaking from experience when I moved between student houses, coming up with the deposit and rent for the new place was quite a struggle, espeically as you don't get the deposit back from the previous proeprty for a while (or unfortunately, never - in my case! An ongoing battle with an infamous Leeds based agency!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When in halls we had to pay 3mths advance.

 

They know students cant budget, thus get there cash when student loan comes in and make sure they get enough to cover till the next one.

 

I didnt stay in Private Halls as the Uni had plenty, but Private Halls seem to give more trust and only every seem to want one month in advance, thus leaving the last month rent free to save for the deposit for the next place.

 

I got my deposit back within a week from the Uni, so guess that was luck.

 

But in-keeping with the title.

 

Student halls are now £95 per week here, now thats a rip off for a box room with the smallest ensuite in history and having to share with 8 others when all 8 come to use one cooker at the same time =)....

 

I went private after, and took a whole 13 months to get back my deposit of 2 months rent. So going with halls may be the best option after-all, and the social life in halls is far better too, if you with the right people that is.

 

I would check with TDS if they have your deposit. I have had mine with them 3 times now, and the landlord has always disputed, and TDS have always given me my cash back and put blaim with either letting agency or landlord. So the scheme works well as i would be over 2k out of pocket if tds didnt sort it out over the three disputes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for your replies. My Daughter has decided to stay with the hall she's at and will move into a house with some of the others at the end of February. It's not really a problem for her because she has enough money in her accounts to deal with this. I just thought it a bit unfair on some of the ones who are wholly dependent on their bursaries to have to pay up front like this.

 

Regards to all.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...