Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4780 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

12 + 2 working days.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Still no CCA, I received a letter last week thanking me for my patience. I have given them long enough 2 months!!!!!!!! will now send them the account in dispute letter.

 

Meantime they have passed the account on to their collection agency, collections direct????, they are trying to scare me with the CCJ letter. The funny thing is the account is pretty much up to date!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citi are well aware that whilst they have not provided a copy of the "executed agreement" to you after the statutory period, they should not be enforcing the agreement.

 

The Office Of Fair Trading has clarified that a creditor who is in default of the a s77/s78 request is not entitled to enforce the agreement at all either with or without a court order - which would extend to requesting or chasing payments under that said agreement until which time they provide a copy of the "executed agreement", or the details present in that original agreement.

 

They are entitled to exclude certain information such as signature, signature box, signature date, and can retype the document if needs be, but the document should exactly match the original - and not be a copy of the Terms & Conditions, or varied Terms & Conditions as some creditors have been doing.

 

In appointing a debt collection agency Citi are being their normal self, rules, regulations and laws don't apply it's only the bottom line that matters.

 

I would suggest complaining to the OFT about the absence of your s77/s78 request under the Consumer Credit Act being delivered to you, and state that the creditor (Citi) are clearly still enforcing the agreement against you in a period that they shouldn't as they are employing a debt collection agent who is badgering you for payment.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

You won't get anything out of Citi, there are lots and lots of us waiting on a reply - this has been ongoing for a couple of years for some of us.

 

That said they are likely to try to continue to enforce the accounts despite being legally barred under s78(6) CCA.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Howdy...

 

What have you received? Summons? Do you mean a County Court claim pack and defence forms, etc?

 

Actually, having them take action against you will be helpful as you can formally request documentation relating to their claim now it's in the Court system - something you can't do without having took action against them yourself.

 

They must be fairly confident of a win, but I can't see how they can win with no agreement :lol:

 

Can you post up what the particulars of claim say, removing personal and identifying information?

 

When was the claim issued - the exact date on the top right of the claim form - and when does it say you have to acknowledge the claim until?

 

Is there anything attached to the claim form?

 

Was it issued in Northampton, or a local County Court?

 

There's more questions I can ask, but let's take one step at a time... :dance:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very strange,since Cabot will usually bombard with monthly letters before initiating any claim.

If that has not happened,then they have not followed CPR protocols.

Can you confirm that you have had nothing from Cabot prior to the summons ?

Also what is the amount being claimed on the claim form ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for looking at this Chris.... you were the very person that sprang to mind when I read the post.

 

CPR request to view the original executed agreement I believe, knowing that Citi in the past has doggedly resisted parting with them - even to companies who have purchased accounts from them.

 

Certainly 1st Credit weren't able to obtain it for love or money, despite the fact that Trading Standards were able to furnish me with it months earlier.

 

Could possibly do with finding out a bit more detail, i.e. when the account was opened etc.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...