Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Garage gave me faulty engine


raccoonboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, hoping you can give me some advice. Here's my story:

 

Engine in my car was accidentally destroyed in December last year. I found a garage who offered to fit a second hand engine for £1000, which they did. I got a receipt from them stating new engine, new head gaskets, no warranty.

 

Now within a week of picking up the car, I started noticing symptoms of leaking head gaskets (tho I didn't know at the time that's what it was). Stuttering at ignition, bubbles coming out the coolant etc. Eventually, about 3 or 4 weeks later, the car broke down completely and I had to get the AA to come and tow it for me.

 

Now at this point I contacted the garage who had done the work, and they said it sounded like a sensor problem, which wasn't their fault since the sensors were the sensors from my old engine. They offered to fix it, but I'd have to pay. I said ok, come and pick up my car for me. Long story short, a month went by and they kept saying they were too busy to come and collect it (this is called fobbing off in my opinion.)

 

Eventually, I got p*ssed off and got the car towed (at my expense) to a different garage. Expecting them to simply change a sensor or sort some other minor fault, I was amazed to hear that the car had leaking head gaskets!

 

I got in touch with the garage who had done the initial work, and told them they had basically provided me with a faulty engine. They are arguing of course, saying that I should have got it to them sooner (I had tried for a month to get them to pick it up!) and they are also arguing that they have no obligation to help since there's no warranty.

 

So basically, I paid £1000 for a replacement engine and new head gaskets, but got a replacement engine with leaking head gaskets.

 

I'm taking them to a small claims court to get my money back, or get them to repair it for free. I have all the emails they sent me fobbing me off, and I can get confirmation from a different garage that the head gaskets are leaking. Obviously the AA can confirm the car broke down shortly after my picking it up from the garage aswell, plus I have witnesses as to the situation as it progressed. Do I have a decent case here?

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow, sorry to hear of this, I hope others who can help give an answer, I did know someone who had a very similar issue with being sold a car that broke down within weeks, they took it back and got money back or offer of repair, I think you should stick to your guns, how about trading standards also?

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Courts are very much on the side of the consumer, more so in car related problems than with other goods and services.

 

Chronicle every thing that has happened with dates and times, invoices and other paperwork.

 

Send a copy of this to the garage and give him 7 days to come up with a resolution. Mention that failure of a sataisfactory response by 7 days will result in summons being issued without further notice.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, will do. I've already spoken to them via email and discussed the timeline of events, their response was that they have nothing to do with it because they stated there was no warranty, but that they'll repair it for half price as a 'goodwill gesture' (yeh right). That would still cost me upwards of £500, add to that the fact that I've been without the car for almost this whole year so far because of this crap and it's just a bit unacceptable isn't it?

 

I've never been through a claims procedure before so if there's anything I should know to avoid making any stupid mistakes, I'd appreciate the advice.

 

What should I claim, should I try to get back the initial £1000 or what?

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They supplied the engine. They also fitted new head gaskets, this is on the receipt. Obviously the agreement was that the engine would be a good, working engine, tho it doesn't say that on the receipt (it's a given). I do have the initial email conversations which are evidence to the effect that I would be paying them for a working engine.

 

I paid by bank transfer.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. The bad part is paying by bank transfer,. which is in effect cash.

 

However, you have been conned. This is bordeline deception/fraud and I think you need to hinge around that thought.

 

The garage has sold you an engine and claim to have fitted new head gaskets. Clearly from what you say they did not fit new head gaskets, so they have lied. It is a criminal offence to make a false statement in realtion to a business and the maximum penalty if convicted of doing so is £5000 fine and/or 6 months in prison. So, we are not talking a slap on the wrist here.

 

This garage told you that bubbles coming out of the radiator tank was a possible sensor problem? Sensors do not create bubbles. They sound like cowboys and they think they have had you.

 

First port of call is trading standards without question.

 

They tried to hinge on the 'no warranty' part, but this falls under the sale of goods act and the goods in this case is a replacement engine which they claim to have effectively ovehauled. You have the right to expect a reasonable quality and a reasonable life from this engine. Depending on the type of car you have that will vary, but I would say at least a few years!

 

The goods you have been sold are not fit for the purpose purchased, ie a good replacement engine. The fact they lied to you about the head gaskets makes this a criminal matter and trading standards are the people you need in on this.

 

Talk to TS first to see what they say before contacting the garage again. When you do contact the garage do so only in writing and only by recorded delivery so you have proof you sent the letters. Keep a copy of everything, especialy those e-mails.

 

It will help me understand better if I know what kind of car and espcecially what engine you have. You says head gaskets rather than gsaket, so I presume it has more than one head, which makes it a V6, v8 or V12.

 

Why did they offer no warranty? Were you told this BEFORE you bought it? I have done several engine changes over the years and the very minimum anyone expects from an engine change is 12 months or 12,000 miles.

 

This stinks and gets everyone in the car industry a bad name., There are lots of garages like this, but fortunately there are lots more who are not like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car is a Subaru; the engine is an EJ25. Whether they put new head gaskets on or not I don't know; I'm assuming they did, but just did a poor job so they leaked.

 

I'll give you a bit more detail: Shortly after picking the car up (within a fortnight) I started noticing bubbling noises behind the dash. I do know that Subarus tend to suffer from air in the heater matrix, so I didn't think much of this. However it also was playing up at ignition, with engine hesitation. When this eventually got so bad that the car didn't start and I had to call the AA (this was a month after collecting the car), I got in touch with the garage who told me that it was probably a sensor problem. Basically, instead of saying 'ok, we recently fitted the engine, bring it back to us and we'll fix it' they said 'can't be anything we've done, must be something else that isn't anything to do with the work we did on it, we can fix it but you'll have to pay for it' which for a start is pretty poor service.

 

It wasn't until about another month later that I got sick of waiting for them to tow my car (at my expense) that I decided they were a bit dodgy, so I took the car to a different garage, who diagnosed leaking gaskets.

 

I'd rather just get my money back than have to deal with them again, is this what I should persue in court?

 

Thanks again for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Ok so I've been through the system, getting in touch with Trading Standards etc. Have sent the garage a letter informing of my intended court action, to which they have replied they intend to defend my claim. Additionally, they said that they will pursue their costs in making their defence. Can they do this? If they were to win the claim, would I have to pay their fees? How does that work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must have heard the expression "The best form of defence is attack", well -

Can they do this?
- it's working in this case, they have you worried.

 

Do you have paperwork saying 'new head gasket' etc; or was that all verbal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got the receipt detailing everything they replaced. I have a document from the AA that I got when I had to call them out the next month. I have the majority of the emails between the garage and myself, particularly the ones where I had tried to get them to collect the car over the course of several weeks.

 

One of their arguments is that I didn't return the car to them straight away, but continued to drive it for months which furthered the damage. Actually, I tried to get them to come and tow it while it sat not being used for months, as it wouldn't start.

 

I'm definitely taking this to the courts, I just wanted to know what to expect if they won their defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a quote from another garage.

 

Time to send them a recorded delivery letter with a demand that they put all the fault right at their expense and give them 7 days to collect it. At the end of 7 days if the car hasn't been collected or they fail to respond to your letter or insist they wont take it for repair, send them another with the quote (don't enclose the quote) giving them another 7 days to collect and then you will take the car in for repairs and start court proceedings to recover the cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Ok so this is going to court. The car is still out of action and I'm probably scrapping it. I just want my money back for the initial work.

 

What's it like in a court for a small claim like this? Is it informal etc, how many people are likely to be present?

Also, can I take signed statements from witnesses to help my case? Such as a letter from a friend or family member confirming my story to be true?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - if you lose you pay theiur costs, that's the way it works. The engine will not have been 'new' it will have been trade sourced - probably from a scrap merchant, known and trusted by the garage. The arrangement is invariably if an engine is a dud, they'll do a free exchange for another within 7 days of fitting. after that - you're on your own.

 

Replacement engines are seldom warrantied other than I previously described, but the usual issue is it isn;t the cost of the engine, butr the man hours of removing the old and replacing it, based on the number of hours this will take. Your redress remains with the original garage to fix, as attempting to get the work done elsewhere and billing them for it may still disadvantage you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry to interupt but did TS not reccommend an independent engineer inspection? Normally they have ones that they can reccommend and it would carry more weight in court as opposed to friends and family

However you would have to pay for the inspection and report but given the amount of time that has passed I suspect it may prove difficult for an engineer to give an accurate assessment.

 

hope this helps Tigger

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well when I gave up on the garage that did the work due to them fobbing me off, I took it to another garage in May who diagnosed the leaking gaskets. So if they can give me some sort of confirmation of their inspection that'll be good enough right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not neccesarily - as this still leaves room for the original garage to dispute the findings and the dispute rumbles on. If THEY remain in control, it makes it difficult for them to blame anyone else, which I can almost guarantee will happen here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all. You are saying that.

 

I'm saying that in the case of any complaint, it is the original garage that the complaint must be resolved with (and in a timely manner). If the CH Gasket was wrong due to an error in the rebuild or install, that is their problem and they must have the first opportunity to rectify the problem. If they do not, then you go elsewhere, get it done and bill them for the cost of rectification. Your justifiction for doing this is their refusal to do it - in this case a court would be on your side, not that of the original garage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've given them an opportunity to rectify the problem and as described, they fobbed me off initially then offered to fix it half price. Not good enough, that's why I raised the issue with the court. I can't afford to go and get this fixed at another garage then bill them (and risk not even getting that money back) so I'm taking them to court for a refund of what I paid.

 

So instead of having a receipt from another garage for gasket replacement, I'd have a damage assesment and a quote for the repair. In your previous post you imply that this wouldn't be enough, that the original garage could dispute it etc....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could dispute the gasket replacement if they maintain they were not given an opportunity to fix the problem (which isa what you need to be careful about). Providing the waters aren't muddied by other third parties, you should be OK!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So where do I stand considering the fact that I repeatedly requested that they tow the car, but they kept saying 'this week' 'next week' 'in a few days' etc. for several months?

 

Basically I got sick of their crap and had no choice but to go elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...