Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help needed-Metropolitan and Lloyds


DDWales
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning all. Any advice very much appreciated.

 

Ive been paying back two overdrafts (so cant CCA ethier :().

Both are by DD-one to Lloyds directly and Metropolitan (passed on by HSBC)

-both on a one payment a month basis and all add up to £135 a month.

 

I have recently finished my job and will be starting a new post in September so money is very tight at the minute until then.

 

Phoned Metro (i know i shouldnt have bothered but nothing ventured...).

 

they obviously werent interested and stated that i could make a token payment and then what ever the shortfall would be would then be added to the following month which would almost double the amount :eek:.

 

I expected the same from Lloyds so didnt phonethem :

(. Any ideas? The amounts will be taken out of my account on the 20th so need to resolve quickly as i cannot afford this.

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Offer them what you can afford if they wont play ball then stop the payments or just pay what you can. MCS are not very nice so I am not suprised at their response.

 

if these are overdrafts are there any charges you can reclaim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Offer them what you can afford if they wont play ball then stop the payments or just pay what you can. MCS are not very nice so I am not suprised at their response.

 

if these are overdrafts are there any charges you can reclaim?

 

Cheers PGH7447! MCS are lovely arent they!!! I have no money to offer at the moment until payday on the 20th-things are that bad at the minute. I obviously dont want to wait until then though before cancelling as the cash will go out anyhow. Shall i cancel my DDs now then phone them on the day and make an offer then?

 

The other thing i need to know is that if i do this what will be thier next step? They will probably want the money in full, increase the payments threaten court etc? Just want to get a clearer picture.

 

I will be going down the bank charges route with them as i know theres charges (from memory)but cannot afford the £10 to SAR them at the minute though.

Thanks again

Edited by DDWales
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Make a token payment of £1 if you can. You must cancel all the DDs and standing orders otherwise you'll be slammed for penalty charges.

 

They'll moan for a couple of months, but hopefully you'll be earning before they can do anything serious. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Will phone them and do that. What happens if they wont accept the £1 i offer though?

 

It would be wise to open a 'parachute' a/c with an unrelated bank because they will more than likely offset from one a/c to another & if you have benefits being paid into it things could become very difficult.

 

Not sure i understand. Sorry its a stressful day today:eek: I have another account but with the same bank-Halifax. One account for the DDs (the one mentioned) and another for my pay (although theres nothing in that ethier!). When paid, i allocate amounts to the DD account to cover things. Its worked well until now. Is that the sort of thing you mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A parachute account is simply a separate bank account you use, so if you bank with Halifax then open a 'parachute' account with Lloyd's.

 

That way then when your money goes into the new account, Halifax can't swallow it up and leave you with buttons to eat off for a month!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will accept the £1, cause that is money to them,

 

A parachute account is a bank account in a different bank to these overdrafts, so that they cant "creep" into your account and take the money to "Offset" the debt, which is what they do.

 

So before the 20 cancel your DD's to these firms, open another bank account and get paid into that, then you control where the money goes

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another question. I was thinking-could i change my DDs to say £5 instead of the amount that they (Lloyds and Metro) originally would take? The logic being that i wont have to speak to Lloyds and Metropolitan over the phone to offer a token amount or go through the process of cancelling the DDs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Just checked. The Lloyds one is S/O :oops:so alright to change to £5?.. looks like i'll just have to cancel the other DD? Never knew they could take what they wanted by DD though! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

To update. Lloyds S/O changed to £5. Havent heard anything from them as yet...:rolleyes:

 

Now for the next step...

Cancelled the DD with Metro. They have started the calls though so need to get the ball rolling. As its still with HSBC (Metro thier in- house collections?) i guess i can pay into the account by hand so to speak? At least then im putting something in regardless so they cant argue the toss? (even though im sure they will!). Shall i then write to them as suggested above offering £5 a month and take it from there? Im sure i'll get a negative response but worth a go to start with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sirs

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Mr T. This will be winging its way shortly. Need to address the other points in the last post though too (although this will be a great start). Just trying to get an angle on things. I dont mind paying them back whatsoever- just not the £80 a month they were getting. Cant afford it at present :sad:

Read a few of the other threads and believe i am right in stating that i can SAR them (i know there will be charges!), start the reclaiming process, and then place the account in dispute over these charges?

Edited by DDWales
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...