Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome - I'm more confused than ever...


Magpie878
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, bit of a long post but would be grateful if anyone could offer some advice....

I applied for a Welcome Finance loan of £4500.00 in October 2006 to pay for costs of divorce.

I was accepted and payments continued on schedule.

In December 2007 a payment break of 1 month was agreed by Welcome Finance, and the missed payment was subsequently paid back in over January and February 2008 (in addition to those months’ regular installments).

In July 2008 I moved to a new address and notified Welcome in writing (I have no proof of this as I didn’t keep a copy of the letter, nor use recorded delivery).

In April 2009 I found that I could no longer make payments due to the fact my car broke down and had to borrow some money from family members. This money is to be paid back at £400 per month, and would cause real hardship for my family if I didn’t pay)

 

Direct Debit was cancelled to prevent bank charges and a letter, explaining this and offering £94 per month, sent to Welcome along with a cheque, Cheque was not cashed and no contact received from Welcome. Again, I did not use recorded delivery.

After one month of no reply, I sent another letter repeating the offer (again by normal 1st class post), with a copy to their registered office as well as my local branch. Again a cheque was enclosed but not cashed.

May 2009 – a third letter and cheque was written and sent (not by recorded delivery).

I received on 4th June, an offer of settlement at 65%.

I responded that I could in no way produce the £2309.41 and so could not accept their offer.

I received a letter dated 17th June from a different representative offering settlement at 50%.I replied that I could not produce £1776.47 , but could make monthly payments of £94.33 until November 2009 and payments of £250.00 per month after that until November 2010 – which would have closed the account in full on the original due date. A cheque was enclosed.

In the meantime they attempted to cash my cheque from May, but after getting the letter of 4th June I had assumed they would not cash this, and failed to leave sufficient funds in my account. I received notification of this on the 18th June.

And finally got a “Notice of Default Sums” dated 30th June detailing 2 x £10 letter charges and a £25 returned cheque fee.

The cheque from my letter of 23rd June has been cashed on 1st July and payment cleared.

I’ve started to think I’m now in a little over my head and am confused by the number of different addresses I need to write to. I don’t want to avoid paying this debt, as I have had the benefit of the money lent -

Please could someone give me some advice on what to do from here? So far I’ve drafted another letter but have just read the huge thread on Welcome and their current position as a functioning company (explains the sudden cessation of their phone calls I suppose...) and am now more confused than ever.

Thanks for your time, and thanks for a great site - have been reading the threads and have learnt a hell of a lot in just a few days.

(PS – Will scan and post copies of letters at first opportunity)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could consider a Subject Access Request or a s.78 CCA request (templates in library) to put this account into dispute while you work out which way is best for you to move forward. This may be particularly useful if they're starting to get awkward. If it turns out that they have an improperly executed CCA it puts you firmly in the driving seat as they cannot enforce the agreement.

"Evancosmo" is short for the evanescent cosmopolite.

 

THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE :rolleyes:

 

1st Credit: CCA request sent

Cabot: failed to provide CCA - s.10 DPA letter sent

Capquest#1: failed to provide CCA - s.10 DPA letter sent

Capquest#2: failed to provide CCA - s.10 DPA letter sent

Abbey: on going

Equifax: "attributable data" CCJ removed - Aug 09

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...