Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome finance not being completely honest?


Ian0579
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I haven't - I definitely remember signing the agreement for 36 months, although there's only one way to find out for sure!

 

No - nothing on the back - just a single sheet of paper

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont panic ian if i seem to be getting ahead of the game,

its just i know what replies welcome will give even before you have them,

you would think they would change the script by now

 

right

next step

 

phone direct group again, give them the policy number and ask them to send out the document again, this time with the t&c

 

remember

 

its a game with this lot, you just have to play along to begin with, position your forces, then pounce

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well here's an interesting response to my telephone harrasment letter (I can't scan at the moment but below is the entire contents of their letter):

 

"Thank you for bringing to our attention your issue regarding your personal loan agreement.

 

I have been trying to contact you to discuss your issues via telephone but have been unsuccessful.

 

Should you have any issues in sending me the above, please contact me on the number stated below."

 

Now I'm sure it's not just me, but I see 2 problems here:

 

1. The letter I sent was regarding telephone harassment and stating that ALL future correspondence should be in writing - why on earth would they try to telephone me about that!!

 

2. "Should you have any issues in sending me the above" - what above? from what I can see they haven't actually asked me to send anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've complained to Welcome, but their replies were a joke. So, my complaint is now with the FOS.

 

keep me updated please

 

Got a final response letter from Welcome this morning with an offer. They "don't agree with my assertions, but as a gesture of good will are going to refund my PPI and Familycare policies". I'm assuming the Familycare is the Lifecare24 policy?

 

They haven't said anything about the fact that the insurance companies have said these policies don't exist. And I'm not happy with the amounts they are offering me, it's only half of what I was was expecting. The figures don't match the breakdown that the sales guy gave me. The premiums do, but the interest is wrong.

 

So, I'm going to see what the FOS say about this as they will have sent this letter to them as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget your not only entitled to the premiums + the interest they charged but you also entitled to charge them a reciprocal contractual interest for the time you were denied the funds. Calculate in the same way as you would bank charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's been 14 days since I sent the CCA and I haven't received anything yet. However according to the post office website they haven't received it yet (sent recorded).

 

Can anybody offer any advice as to the next steps?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another quick question - despite the telephone harassment letter being received by them over 3 weeks ago now they are still calling a couple of times a day (interestingly now it shows up as the main contact number for Welcome rather than the local office number - same person though)

 

Is there a certain letter I should send them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

call their bluff on the recorded delivery letter, either call them and ask where your CCA is or send in a letter of account being in dispute, they will respond quick enough on that or you could just send in a second letter by special delivery and restart the clock.

 

as for the phone calls send a full complaint in to the FOS with copies of all letters sent and recieved plus the log of calls you have received since the telephone harassment letter was sent. also explain why you contacted welcome in the first place, what got you concerned about your account....blah blah

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

Well I've had my subject access request back with details of my current loan - I'm sure from the figures that I will be being charged interest on the acceptance fee (£75), but would somebody be about to take a look at it for me?

 

Some interesting notes on the telephone logs as well - calling 118 400 to try to get work numbers, looking at my work website address to try to get contact details etc!

 

I'll try to scan in documents this afternoon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ian0579 Only if they already have a CCJ. Although (& I may be wrong) *I think under the new CCA 2006 they can go straight for an attachment as well as a charging order thanks to Noo Labour "the party of the working man" *This assumes yours is a relativley new agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...