Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
    • I would say You should accept it - I HIGHLY doubt you will  be able to claim for letters at trial ans they’re offering you that, which is higher monetary value than interest.   Also they raise a good point, getting interest at anything above 4% is lucky these days, yes judges give it, but rarily above 4%   Also you might find depending on the judge  you don’t get some costs if you take it all the way over £7.40 when court woukdnt award letters costs and thus meaning their award would be less than evris offer which was made    Up to you though but the wait will be 3-4mo for a trial date at least
    • Hi Folks, Been 162 days! Just by way of update. Today I received a text from Opos Ltd so no doubt Capquest are renting the debt out to anybody who fancies a nibble. Safe to say I will not be responding.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlords friends enter our house with a key unannounced!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We moved into a new house in April in Edinburgh. It is a short assured tenancy agreement. Our landlord lives in London, so we very rarely hear from him. However, last week we were astounded when two Chinese men entered our property using a key. Our first reaction was that we were being burgled! The two men spoke very broken English, however we eventually established they were the landlords friends and he had asked them to come around to collect his mail! We told them to leave immediately, and that if they ever attempted to gain entry to our house again that we would call the police.

 

We called our landlord as soon as they left, however, he seemed more annoyed that we had asked his "friends" to leave HIS house!!! His explanation for them coming was to collect his mail that is delivered to the house. We told him it was totally unacceptable to allow his friends a set of keys to access our home to collect mail - he said that he had tried to call us all day (which he hadn't at all!) and that because we hadn't answered his calls that day he was entitled to enter the house, although as he wasn't here, he is able to instruct his "agent" (to which there is no reference in the contract!) to enter.

 

We just want some advice here...firstly, is he allowed to give his "friends" a set of the keys? He has said that as he lives in London and the property is in Edinburgh, someone needs a set of keys in case of an emergency. Obviously we are extremely reluctant at his friends having keys now! Can we insist that he takes the set of keys off his friends? Is he (the landlord) even allowed a set?

 

What we find most disturbing is that his "friends" would have no idea where we stored the landlords mail, and so they would obviously have been searching our house going through our personal and valuables trying to locate this.

 

Also, the mail he is getting sent to our home is ridiculous - it's about 4 or 5 letters a day. We suspect he is using our home address as his address for his correspondence. We have asked him several times to have his mail redirected to his own address and to change his address with these companies. He seems to ignore us. Can we now, after 4 months, simply put his mail back in the mail box and write "NOT AT THIS ADDRESS"?

 

Any advice is greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the property was in England/Wales I would advise you to change the locks immediatley. As its in Scotland, im not sure of the legality of this, but I imagine its still acceptable under such a situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am afraid we will have some difficulty here since Scottish tenancy law is very different from England and Wales.

 

I will see if I can find any information for you - but certainly in the UK, this would be TOTALLY ILLEGAL and LL could be prosecuted, and fined VERY HEAVILY.

 

Here are my first practical suggestions:

 

1. Write to LL and tell him that unless he arranges for his mail to be redirected, you will return it all to sender. I suspect he has not told his mortgage company he is letting..........

 

2. Change the locks. Keep the old ones to reinstall when you leave.

 

Meanwhile I will have a root round for some Scottish info - and if anyone with expertise in this is around......

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, have a look here Better Renting Scotland - The Rules&

 

Click on the contact tab at the top and give them a ring.

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice guys, we have been searching the internet for a while trying to find out some info, but can't seem to find out whether we can legally change the locks or not. Obviously we don't want to do anything that would compromise our tenancy.

 

Another question now, just to complicate it even further, I have just come off the phone to our landlord, who has said that we are now due to start paying him council tax. Obviously I was confused as to what he was talking about, but it appears that he has decided to keep the council tax in his name (his excuse was that it would be cheaper for us as he could claim a single person discount!) and that we are now to pay him the council tax. I have told him absolutely no way - that is illegal! We already pay our council tax to the council. It is obvious he is still using this as his address though - why else would he still want to remain on the council tax, and probaly the electoral roll etc. He's obviously then not paying the correct council tax in London - although i'm guessing it is probably cheaper for him to commit fraud and pay Edinburgh rate council tax!!!

 

We're obviously now very worried that this landlord is turning out to be.... well, incredibly dodgy and nothing more than a conman!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - please take a look at this website. Of particular interest are Items 79, 62 and 15 (harrassment)

 

79. Can the landlord enter the house whenever he wants?

The landlord is entitled to enter the house only if and so far as the tenancy agreement specifically says that he may, except that there are special rules about access for repairs which are explained in question 62.

 

62. is the landlord entitled to enter the property to carry out repairs?

The tenants must give the landlord reasonable access to the property and all reasonable facilities to enable him to do any repairs he is entitled or required to do.

Also, where the landlord is by law responsible for repairs he or an agent authorised by him in writing may, at reasonable times of the day and provided he gives the tenant 24 hours notice in writing, enter the property to inspect its condition and state of repair.

If the landlord wishes to do works for which he needs the tenant's agreement, and the tenant refuses, the landlord may be able to ask the sheriff to give him the right to enter the property and do the work.

 

15. What if a landlord seeks possession without doing these 3 things?

It is a criminal offence for anyone to turn a tenant out of his home without a Court Order or to try to make him leave by intimidation, violence, withholding services such as gas or electricity, or any other sort of interference. [it is not a legitimate excuse for a landlord to say that he did not intend his actions to harass his tenant or force him to leave. An offence will still have occurred if he should have known that his actions would be taken by the tenant to be harassment to make him leave]. If anyone tries to force a tenant to leave his home by intimidation or any other form of harassment, the tenant should contact the police immediately.

A landlord found guilty of illegal eviction may be liable to pay damages to the evicted tenant. The level of damages will be based on any financial benefit to the landlord from having a house with vacant possession instead of a house with a sitting tenant.

All this applies to short assured tenancies as well as to other assured tenancies.

 

I think 79 is the one you are mainly interested in. I have not yet found anything relating to a tenant's right to "quiet enjoyment" which is a mainstay of English and Welsh Tenancy law.

 

Assured Tenancies in Scotland - Your Rights and Responsibilities: page 6

 

Hope this helps.

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Better Renting website is also excellent.

 

I have copied this from it - this differs markedly from England and Wales where, except in the case of an emergency, the tenant has the right to refuse access altogether - LL would have to get a court order for access in this situation.

 

Rights of access to your property

You are entitled to enter the property to inspect any repairs required or to carry out repairs. Your tenant is required to give you reasonable access to do this. You should normally arrange a suitable time with the tenant, but you can enter the property, at a reasonable time of day, provided you have given the tenant 24 hours notice in writing. (If an emergency repair is required, you can claim immediate access.)

 

 

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice guys, we have been searching the internet for a while trying to find out some info, but can't seem to find out whether we can legally change the locks or not. Obviously we don't want to do anything that would compromise our tenancy.

 

He would have to take you to court to evict you and I doubt if he will want to go near a court....... If his excuse was that you changed the locks, I don't think any judge would be too sympathetic after hearing of your experience!

 

Another question now, just to complicate it even further, I have just come off the phone to our landlord, who has said that we are now due to start paying him council tax. Obviously I was confused as to what he was talking about, but it appears that he has decided to keep the council tax in his name (his excuse was that it would be cheaper for us as he could claim a single person discount!) and that we are now to pay him the council tax. I have told him absolutely no way - that is illegal! We already pay our council tax to the council.

 

I would contact the council and ensure that the coucil tax liability for the property is in your name - make sure they know you are tenants at the property. Do you pay by direct debit?

 

We're obviously now very worried that this landlord is turning out to be.... well, incredibly dodgy and nothing more than a conman!

 

I wouldn't worry too much about him. Just make sure that you do nothing illegal yourselves. You have rights as tenants. I would suggest that just maybe you might like to ensure that further communication with your landlord is in writing???

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone for their replies - has been really helpful.

 

I've just been told by the landlord that under point 64 in our Short Assured Tenancy Agreement it states that:

 

"Locks may not be added or changed without the prior written agreement of both the Landlord and the Tenant, or unless the changes are made in compliance with the Act."

 

He has said that if we do change the locks, we will be breaching the tenancy agreement and that he can take "further action".

 

The problem is that he is a Chinese Lawyer - ok, so he probably doesn't know much about UK law, but he understands a lot more than us! It seems that although he knows he is in the wrong, he has a "get out" for everything!!! :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you are happy now for his friends to come and go in your home whenever it suits them?

 

If it happens again, call the police.

 

And if you doubt the information given here, please go and have a chat with Shelter or CAB - what is happening is totally unacceptable and just because he is a Chinese lawyer (big deal - many UK lawyers don't know anything about Landlord/Tenant law either) you are letting him intimidate you.

 

Another avenue you might try is a chat with the local housing officer at your local council. They may be able to give you some advice on how to deal with this situation.

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...