Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tenancy Deposit Scheme - Can I claim?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here is my situation... I would really appreciate some help on this.

 

Me and my boyfriend moved into a property last Sept (08). We paid a months deposit plus a months rent. We received a letter stating that the deposit had been protected, but approx 2 months later we got another one stating that they scheme would no longer be responsible for protecting our deposit. I contacted my landlady who said she would get it into another one. In jan 09 me and my boyfriend split up - I paid him his half of the deposit back and my landlady issued me with a new tenancy agreement from the end of jan 09. However she did not return the deposit and just carried it over to the new tenancy.

 

I then lost my job - and had to claim housing benefit. They took ages to sort it out and she was on my case every week. I was paying half the rent myself in order to keep her quiet, but it got to the point where my funds were exhausted, so she suggested that she use my deposit to offset the rent, which I agreed to. The rent is now being paid by the council regularly.

 

However i have just been informed that what she has done is illegal. That she had no right to withdraw the deposit from the scheme (if she had ever reentered it into one) to use as rent!! My tenancy is due to run out at the end of this month, and she wants me to sign a new AST!

 

Could I officially sign this new AST and then take her to court and get 3 x times the deposit as compensation?

 

If this is the case, what happens if she cannot afford to pay me, or refuses the court order to pay??

 

Your help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Halifax £399.62

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Cap One £167.21

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was paying half the rent myself in order to keep her quiet,

 

charming!

 

but it got to the point where my funds were exhausted, so she suggested that she use my deposit to offset the rent, which I agreed to.

 

Well, that was nice of her to allow the deposit to be offset against what you owed her, rather than evicting you.

 

In fact she is the daft one - she now has no deposit against which she can claim for any damages - which is what deposits are for!!

 

And, you have had your deposit back with no deductions.

 

However i have just been informed that what she has done is illegal. That she had no right to withdraw the deposit from the scheme (if she had ever reentered it into one) to use as rent!! My tenancy is due to run out at the end of this month, and she wants me to sign a new AST!

 

Could I officially sign this new AST and then take her to court and get 3 x times the deposit as compensation?

 

It would be an interesting case, since there is no deposit to protect - you have had it back to pay the rent!!!

 

But - let's see now - how can you get some money out of this landlady who has been kind enough to let you stay in her property, not paying the rent for some time and trying to be helpful when you were in difficulties.

 

Any advice I might wish to give you would probably be unprintable but the word "greedy" would certainly be in there somewhere....:mad:

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But - let's see now - how can you get some money out of this landlady who has been kind enough to let you stay in her property, not paying the rent for some time and trying to be helpful when you were in difficulties.

 

Any advice I might wish to give you would probably be unprintable but the word "greedy" would certainly be in there somewhere....:mad:

 

Here Here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

charming!

 

 

 

Well, that was nice of her to allow the deposit to be offset against what you owed her, rather than evicting you.

 

In fact she is the daft one - she now has no deposit against which she can claim for any damages - which is what deposits are for!!

 

And, you have had your deposit back with no deductions.

 

 

 

It would be an interesting case, since there is no deposit to protect - you have had it back to pay the rent!!!

 

But - let's see now - how can you get some money out of this landlady who has been kind enough to let you stay in her property, not paying the rent for some time and trying to be helpful when you were in difficulties.

 

Any advice I might wish to give you would probably be unprintable but the word "greedy" would certainly be in there somewhere....:mad:

 

You really are being unfair - when I told her I would be claiming housing benefit and explained to her the proceedure and time involved, and she was more than happy to do it. Then a WEEK later she started with harrassing phone calls, threatening to change the locks on me, to have me evicted etc..............I received calls every three days for over 2 months, harrassing me - I paid half the rent out of my own pocket, of which I only get £100 a week and got behind in my bills, and she has not repaid me this amount, when she got the housing benefit through!!

 

Somehow I dont think that I am being unfair by asking if I can take her to court when she already owes me money, and she has BROKEN THE LAW

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Halifax £399.62

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Cap One £167.21

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really are being unfair

 

Comments made were based on the information given.

 

- when I told her I would be claiming housing benefit and explained to her the proceedure and time involved, and she was more than happy to do it. Then a WEEK later she started with harrassing phone calls, threatening to change the locks on me, to have me evicted etc..............I received calls every three days for over 2 months, harrassing me - I paid half the rent out of my own pocket, of which I only get £100 a week and got behind in my bills, and she has not repaid me this amount, when she got the housing benefit through!!

 

None of this information was contained in your original posting. And LHA is paid directly to you, so how could she "repay" you. I don't understand this statement.

 

Somehow I dont think that I am being unfair by asking if I can take her to court when she already owes me money, and she has BROKEN THE LAW

 

And as we have said a couple of times now, you gave her permission to use the deposit money to cover the unpaid rent, so there is now no deposit to protect. If you try to sue for this I believe you will fail and could end up paying costs into the bargain. All you can do is to work out how much she actually owes you and threaten to sue her through the small claims procedure, but I cannot see how she owes you money?

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i was wondering if someone could help me also. I moved into my flat in May 2008 with my boyfriend and paid a months rent in advance and a months rent as a bond. When the tenancy was up for renewal in May 2009 my boyfriend and I decided that we would try to find somewhere a bit smaller and cheaper as we were having some money problems. When i rang my landlord to tell him that i intended to give notice he said that he didnt want us to leave as we were good tenants. I asked him about my bond, and weather it had been put in a deposit scheme and he said no but he could put it in one if i wanted. I thought that it was law that the landlord had to put my deposit in a scheme, but i wasnt sure? Anyway, we came to an agreement that we would stay in the flat at a reduced rent while it was on the market and he gave us the difference from our bond back aswell, but kept the equivilent to a months rent, again i asked him if it was going to be put into a scheme and he said that he could do so if i wanted.

 

The landlord sent us a new agreement to sign which we did, and also with the agreement was a typed "Special Conditions" which stated that we had to allow viewings of the flat and give 2 months notice if we wanted to leave and that he would do the same if the flat sold, well we signed these and sent them back but he never returned his parts signed, so now we have given our word that we will give him 2 months notice but we have nothing from him saying so, we dont even have a valid tenancy agreement signed by him.

 

Over the past few months while the flat has been on the market, I have allowed viewings of the property, letting people come after i finish work or at weekends, at the begginging of this week I gave the landlord 2 months notice as my boyfirend and i have broken up and i can no longer afford the flat on my own, I have heard nothing from him regarding the letter which I have sent until the estate agents called me this morning and said that at the landlords request I was to have the estate agents a key to the flat cut and allow them to conduct viewings while i am work. I am not very happy about this, as a i dont really want people in and out of the flat while i am not there, but im not sure where i stand. Is this normal for estate agents to have a key to a property while there are still tenants in the property? and what is the position regarding the bond?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The law states that he has to give you 2 months notice so do not worry about that.

 

As for mine - I have since been advised that when a deposit is protected under one of these guarantee schemes, it cannot be used for anything other than "damages" - which then has to be agreed between both the tenant and the landlord. Due to the fact that she took my deposit out of the scheme without my initial knowledge, she has broken the law, secondly she should not have offset it against the rent, regardless of it being my suggestion.

 

Finally - the arrears for housing benefit were sent direct to my landlord, as I had the choice of it being paid direct to me or her - i paid half the rent during the period of waiting for the housing benefit to be sorted out. She had all the rent backdated by the council, plus the money i had paid her and she has not refunded any o f it to me.

 

She has now been served with notice of intent to take her to court

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Halifax £399.62

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Cap One £167.21

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...