Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Baldilocks. Welcome to CAG. I've done some minor formatting edits to your post to make it easier to read for people on mobile. Try to keep to 1 or 2 sentences max before creating a line break in your post. It's the Consumer Rights Act 2015, not the Sale of Goods Act 2015. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 superseded The Sale Of Goods Act 1979 and the latter does not apply as I imagine this purchase was made after 1st October 2015. Can you confirm the make, model and age of of vehicle? Some vehicles have their service history stored within the on board computers now or have it available to view online at any point. How did you pay for the vehicle? Finance (what type), Debit/Credit Card etc? I would argue, that should the above points not be correct, you would be right to claim that the goods are not as described under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.  
    • Thanks everyone for all your help, but unfortunately my case was dismissed. This is the 2nd time I've had this happen now so I doubt ill be taking on any parking firms in future sadly. The judge said I lost it on the grounds that the sign said I had 28 days to declare who the owner of the vehicle was, and said I should have complied with this.  My costs are Judgment for the claimant £133.33 Issue fee Hearing fee Solicitors costs - total £265 grand total £398.33 Do those costs look about right?
    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Should I report Natwest?


missdpd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

Quick summary of what has happened so far and then my questions of what to do.

 

Basically I defaulted on 2 overdrafts with Natwest. Upon reviewing the 'makeup' of these overdrafts, I found a large part of the overdrafts to be made up of charges and so went through the process of contacting Natwest asking for the money back etc but obviousely they said no and now I have filed the charges in court and am currently on a stay.

 

My first question is:

Natwest have now passed this disputed debt to a DCA, to act on their behalf and who are now pursuing for the full amount. Now am I correct in believing as the amount they are chasing is in dispute due to the charges and currently on a stay at court that they should not be chasing this debt until it has been resolved at court.

With this in mind, I did do a letter to the DCA stating this but they have totally ignored it and sent me an LBA.

 

and my second question is:

As I have promised to report them if they choose to ignore my letter and continue chasing, do i report just the DCA or do i report both DCA and Natwest, as Natwest should not have enlisted the DCA in the first place.

 

Sorry if this is a bit long winded, hope it makes sense though.

 

ta

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

In could be in your favour if they do chase you cos you can counterclaim for charges.....it's a lose lose situation for them. I would report the DCA anyway cos they have ignored your polite request to get stuffed even though you have supplied the court claim number.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well it appears Fredricksons have now passed it back to NatWest. Have received a letter from Triton Credit Services stating:

 

'In response to your recent letter, the outcome of the charges case is still pending (errrr yeah i mentioned that in MY letter to Fredrickons!).

However we still require repayments toward the account to prevent further action'.

 

It then goes on to say if i require updates on the Charges Case then to contact their customer Services etc.

 

Any ideas how to respond? Having already sent a letter to Fredricksons informing them they are in breach of OFT guidelines for trying to collect on an account that is in dispute AND having reported them to OFT after they then sent a second letter, do I now send the same letter to Triton?

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it appears Fredricksons have now passed it back to NatWest. Have received a letter from Triton Credit Services stating:

 

'In response to your recent letter, the outcome of the charges case is still pending (errrr yeah i mentioned that in MY letter to Fredrickons!).

However we still require repayments toward the account to prevent further action'.

 

It then goes on to say if i require updates on the Charges Case then to contact their customer Services etc.

 

Any ideas how to respond? Having already sent a letter to Fredricksons informing them they are in breach of OFT guidelines for trying to collect on an account that is in dispute AND having reported them to OFT after they then sent a second letter, do I now send the same letter to Triton?

 

xx

 

Triton are in house debt collection of RBS Group. The account is in dispute so tell them that it is reasonable for you to make all repayment plans on the conclusion of the OFT test case issues when you will be clear on what the outcome is, you might even want to offer £1 token payments per month until such time as the test case issues are resolved(they cannot say you are not trying to be reasonable, can they? ;) )

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well phone rang today and guess who was on the other end :rolleyes: told them not to bother me etc and that a letter was on its way to them. Then I finally let the guy speak.............he asked to go through some security questions I said no ta. He then said ok we shall pass it on for further action so I said thank you very much and put the phone down :D.

 

God im so polite.

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have received a reply from Natwest acknowledging the letter I sent to Triton. Basically they are telling me that my account is in the process of being allocated to agents (again!) and that the agents will contact me direct.

 

I really feel I am banging my head against a brick wall here as no one seems to want to acknowledge that the accounts are in DISPUTE due to charges, which are currently 'stayed' at court and that their persistance in chasing me for the FULL outstanding balances is unfair and unjust.

 

Sorry, just needed to rant and moan a bit.

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have received a reply from Natwest acknowledging the letter I sent to Triton. Basically they are telling me that my account is in the process of being allocated to agents (again!) and that the agents will contact me direct.

 

I really feel I am banging my head against a brick wall here as no one seems to want to acknowledge that the accounts are in DISPUTE due to charges, which are currently 'stayed' at court and that their persistance in chasing me for the FULL outstanding balances is unfair and unjust.

 

Sorry, just needed to rant and moan a bit.

 

xx

 

I take it they mentioned nothing about the offer of £1.00 until the conclusion of the OFT test case issues?

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter just says that they have noted the contents of my letter, however, the account is in the process of being allocated to agents and once this has been completed the agents will contact me direct.

 

No mention of my court cases or the OFT Test Case or my £1 on each account offer or anything, just ignored me basically.

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter just says that they have noted the contents of my letter, however, the account is in the process of being allocated to agents and once this has been completed the agents will contact me direct.

 

No mention of my court cases or the OFT Test Case or my £1 on each account offer or anything, just ignored me basically.

 

xx

 

Write back to them and tell them that every time they allocate agents that you will be reminding every single one that they are in breach of the OFT debt collection guidelines on chasing a disputed debt and will be reporting every single agent plus RBS to the OFT for doing so. Furthermore, you will make a complaint to the FOS that you made a reasonable offer of £1.00 a month until the conclusion of the OFT test case as a gesture of your goodwill so that when it is concluded you will make arrangements at that time to settle the account. If the bank want to keep sending agents then you will keep reporting them and making complaints to the FOS on the basis that you are being reasonable.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, already reported Fredricksons to OFT so can't see it being them and I sent AIC scuttling away before that. Wonder who will be next!

 

Are they just trying it on or are they so stupid as to not recognise an account in dispute when they see one? or both! haha!

 

Thanks again Yourbank.

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Well I have received yet another letter from Natwest saying they are still investigating my complaint; this now makes three letters in total since I sent my letter to them threatening to report them for pursuing collection on overdrafts in dispute due to bank charges incorporated into the amount owed.

 

Not quite sure why it is taking them so long but one theory I have is that they may be dragging this 'investigation' out until the outcome of the appeal and then, depending which way the appeal goes, inform me of their findings.

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have received a response from Natwest and will type the relevant bits up:

 

Dear missdpd,

 

I note that you are refusing to make any realistic repayment proposals in respect of your accounts until the outcome of the test case, regarding bank charges, which is presently before the High Court, is known.

 

The office in Edinburgh that is dealing with charges claims has confirmed that you have made claims of £xxx in respect of account xxxxxxxx and of £xxxx in respect of account xxxxxxxx. If both of your claims are upheld in full, which has yet to be determined, this still leaves the sum of £xxxx owing to the bank. I cannot see any reason, therefore, for you to withhold repayments in respect of £xxxx.

 

It then goes on for me to phone them to discuss repayment proposals.

 

Now then, the amounts they have obtained from their Edinburgh office do NOT include the interest incurred on the charges, nor does it include the 8% court interest. Had it done so, the amount they say I owe would be reduced considerably. This therefore is not a 'true' reflection of the amount I am claiming in court.

 

Should I therefore write back to them pointing this out and outline the figures as shown on my court claims, including pointing out the 8% interest being incurred at a daily rate whilst on the stay at court.

 

I have no problems whatsoever coming to an agreement with regards to a repayment plan over the amount outstanding once this has been acknowleged, based on my figures, I do however have a problem with them ignoring this fact and trying to make me pay over £2,000 more than I may possible owe.

 

Thanks

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...