Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Renting, water through roof/walls, no contents insurance. Anyone liable?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5399 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I hope this is the correct place to post. I couldn't find any way to search the forums either...

 

My partner and I along with a friend are renting a property from a private landlady who owns a propery on the 4th foor of a building in London. There is another property above. Yesterday with the heavy rain water started pooring through the ceiling/walls/downlights any unfortunately onto some electronic equipment I had on my computer desk.

 

There is a property above, and there was no damage at all.

 

There has been the same problem on a smaller level twice since we moved in (mid March). We told our landlady, who said she would be around both times but never came.

 

Apparently there is a drain above which has been blocked with leaves the first two times, and when cleaned by the guy (owns his flat) above it fixed the problem. No one is sure what has gone wrong this time, but it has gone right through the two flats below, taking some panels off one ceiling. The guy above says the drain is clean, which I have seen (after the flooding).

 

Unfortunately we don't have contents insurance since I felt theft was my biggest concern, and feel very safe here, and that as this has happened twice before I would have to disclose that fact to the insurers.

 

Does anyone have any advice on what, if anything I can do? As yet there has been no fix/problem found that lets me believe it won't happen again. Can I try claim from the building insurers? Our landlady is denying any responsibilty...

 

 

Thanks for any advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have another question in case anyone reads this.

 

Are we on grounds to demand a reduction in rent until this problem is fixed? Since nothing has been done to stop this from happening again (for the 5th time) we are basically living here under the assumption that the room (our bedroom) will have water pooring in through the ceiling again the next time it rains. We are basically forced to keep our possessions in certain places that are not likely to get direct water fall :/

 

This is in the tenancy agreement, can anyone write this in plain English?:

 

"The parties agree...

 

© If the Property or any part thereof shall at anytime during the tenancy be destroyed or damaged so as to become unfit for habitation and use and the policy of insurance effected by the Landlord or any Superior Landlord shall not have been vitiated or payment of the policy monies refused in whole or in part in consequence of any act or default of the Tenant the rent hereby reserved or a fair proportion thereof according to the nature and extent of the damage sustained shall be suspended until the property shall again be rendered fit for habitation and use."

 

And to annoy me even further last night our landlady's husband turned up to ask if we could either be home or leave our key for another tennant to let their insurers in to inspect the flat! We told them no, one of us wanted to be here while this was going on. Today we find our our landlady has left work and come around to let them in. This was less than 24 hours after we explicitly told them no! What does the law actually do against that sort of thing???

 

 

Thanks again for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you contact the Environmental Health Department of your local council and tell them what has happened. Tell them that you are very concerned about your safety since this water penetrated the ceiling and the plaster may come down, and also the electric lights etc.

 

Tell them you have contacted your LL and that she refuses to do anything about the problem.

 

Is your agreement an AST? How long is the term?

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

"The parties agree...

 

© If the Property or any part thereof shall at anytime during the tenancy be destroyed or damaged so as to become unfit for habitation and use and the policy of insurance effected by the Landlord or any Superior Landlord shall not have been vitiated or payment of the policy monies refused in whole or in part in consequence of any act or default of the Tenant the rent hereby reserved or a fair proportion thereof according to the nature and extent of the damage sustained shall be suspended until the property shall again be rendered fit for habitation and use."

 

This says what you think it says. The bit about it becoming unfit for habitation is the bit you need the Environmental Health officer for:)

 

And to annoy me even further last night our landlady's husband turned up to ask if we could either be home or leave our key for another tennant to let their insurers in to inspect the flat! We told them no, one of us wanted to be here while this was going on. Today we find our our landlady has left work and come around to let them in. This was less than 24 hours after we explicitly told them no! What does the law actually do against that sort of thing???

 

 

Thanks again for any advice.

 

This LL is real numpty. This is serious.

 

First of all, they have no legal right to enter your property without your express permission, which, unless it is an emergency, you can legally refuse. To do so is harrassment.

 

Contact your LL and state quite clearly that you have taken advice and they have no legal right to enter the property without your express permission, with or without the correct written notice having been given, and that despite this permission being denied, they entered your home.

 

This amounts to denial of your entitlement to "quiet enjoyment" of your home and is harrassment and as such they lay themselves open to criminal proceedings.

 

You are perfectly entitled, under these circumstances, to change the locks - you must keep the old one and refix it when you leave. You do not have to give the keys to the LL or his Agent.

 

Do not let them bully or intimidate you. You do have rights in this matter and they are laying themselves open to a serious criminal charge.

 

And I would call Environmental Health tomorrow..... This LL needs a lesson in Landlord/Tenant law.

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply!

 

Unfortunately we are still living in the room. The first few times it came through it missed all of our possessions and the landlords furniture but the last it has possibly damaged some of my property. I think the majority is probably ok, maybe a printer and some other stuff. I think we would have trouble claiming that it is not fit for habitation at this stage. It may sound worse than it is. It is the water that is the big concern.

 

The roof is stained in places but has no signs or any real damage and the carpet is wet. They got people to come and clean it, but didn't ask them to dry it! (why???) What is worring me is that this will quite likely happen again.

 

With the section I quoted in my 2nd post, would you read it to mean that if our bedroom cannot be used as we would like due to the likleyhood of water coming though again, as far as not being able to leave possessions where we would like etc. we should be entitled to a rent reduction?

 

The AST started mid-March, is 12 months long and has a 6 month break clause.

 

My partner replied to our landlady via text (after receiving a text where she said she had been around) that she was not allowed to enter without 24 hours notice. She didn't receive a reply. I don't really want to inflame the situation since they choose to terminate our tenancy :/

 

They are generally nice landlords, but I think she is too busy with work to do anything.

 

I really can't stress any more about the damage and any court costs would not make it worth while. I think I would settle for a rent reduction until the problem is sorted at the moment.

 

 

I really appreciate your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry - I don't think they have behaved very nicely at all. And if she is too busy, she shouldn't rent out property - or should use an agent. She has responsibilities to her tenants and she is not shouldering them.

 

Can't imagine why you would want to stay in a potential waterfall, but that is your choice. Shame you did not have contents insurance - you can get it really cheaply now. Not sure where you stand now, since this has happened a number of times.

 

I would still consider telling LL that if it happens again, you will sue her for the cost of replacing any damaged goods. And definitely ask for a rent reduction.

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'll send an email this weekend asking for the rent reduction. I'm also going to point out that she commited a criminal offence by entering without giving us the required notice. I don't want to come off too bad since we are now 2 months from the 6 month break clause... The flat is good for what we want other than this problem, and all we want is to pay rent and have a place to stay.

 

I was actually planning to get contents insurance since I was putting together a reasonably expensive computer, but knew I wouldn't be able to with the ceiling having already leaked since we have been in here. Am I right in being able to demand some sort of letter/proof that the problem has been rectified in order get insurance? I actually called More Than today but their systems were down.

 

I came across this site:

Tenancy Agreement Service | Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreements

 

For some reason it didn't seem to come up in most of my searching, but is very helpful. Does anyone know how good/trust-worthy the "Ask A Property Lawyer" is?

 

 

Thanks again for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've finally got a response...

 

She is denying any responsibility at all. Blaming it all on the leaves occasionally blocking the guttering. She is claiming that she hasn't even received the email I sent her on Tuesday, and yet seems to almost be replying to the points I made in the email.

 

What right do we have to withhold rent? I am now going to print the letter and hand-deliver it as she only lives one street away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...