Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Intelligent Finance Selling on Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5404 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Firstly apologies if this is in the wrong place!

 

We have filed a claim on Bank charges with intelligent finance. Our account which is no longer in use is overdrawn due to charges alone, so we filed the claim just before they were put on hold while OFT goes through the courts.

 

Our dilemma is, IF have passed on the Debt to Moorcroft debt collection & they are now pursuing us for the re-payment despite IF knowing the debt is in dispute waiting for the courts outcome.

 

Please can someone give any advice on whether IF can do this & how best to deal with Moorcroft on this issue?

 

Many thanks

Kathy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the account should be in dispute as you are claiming back bank charges, so you can report IF to the following, also you should ask IF for their full complaints procedure and that of the other threat monkeys 'moocr@p'

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

 

Consumer Direct who will also inform Trading Standards

 

Financial Ombudsman Service

 

How to Complain

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, will get onto that.

 

Apparently when my husband spoke to IF they told him that it doesnt make any difference if they sell or pass on the debt, as if it is a positive court outcome we would still get our money back? I find that odd, as debt agencies ect then add on charges & trying to get money back from them would be a nightmare!

Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S Also, do not talk to Moorcr@p over the phone, tell them you want everything in writing 'only'

If they begin huffing and puffing and threatening all and sundry just ignore them, the account is in dispute and it was when they were sold the lemon!

 

- HARASSMENT WARNING -

 

WARNING: PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997

 

 

 

Telephone Number:

 

Re: Harassment by Telephone

 

 

 

** *** 2009

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

I am writing in relation to telephone calls that I have received from your organisation, which I deem to be personally harassing. I have requested that these calls stop, but I am still receiving calls. I now require the telephone number listed above to be completely removed from your systems.

 

I am in the view that your continued calling puts you in breach of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

This is a private telephone line, operated on a contract with the intention of receiving and making personal phone calls, I have not authorised any other member of my family to receive calls from your organisation using this PRIVATE TELEPHONE LINE.

 

By using this telephone number without my permission you are interfering with my ability to use my own private property for the duration of any call.

 

It is my right to require that this telephone line, which is licensed solely to myself, is kept clear for my own personal calls.

 

It is consequently my view that you are committing the tort of interference with contract insofar as for the duration of each call you make to me without my permission, you are interfering with my contractual right to receive and make personal calls on my private telephone line.

 

Continued interference with my contractual rights in this manner will result in legal action.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to the Office of Communications, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable for a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that all telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently when my husband spoke to IF they told him that it doesnt make any difference if they sell or pass on the debt, as if it is a positive court outcome we would still get our money back? I find that odd, as debt agencies ect then add on charges & trying to get money back from them would be a nightmare!

 

That is exactly why your advised not to speak to them over the phone, unless you are recording your phone calls? And unless you can, then you will have no evidence of that phone call!

 

Don't pay anyone anything! If you are in the process of claiming bank charges back from 'IF' then they had no right to sell on your account as a debt.

Which is why you must now go down the formal complaints procedure, if 'IF' are too arrogant to follow their own complaints procedure then that is their look out!

 

Complain to all those I posted above, DCA's fees are unenforceable, they have to take you to court first, and explain to the judge why they have added 100% fees to your outstanding debt, and they won't do that because they know the judge will laugh them all the way out of the court room!:lol:

 

Ignore them, complain about them also to the OFT.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant Thanks!

 

Where it states "I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name). " can we say that as technically we do owe the debt to IF & if the OFT are unsuccessful then we have to pay it back :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

when my husband spoke to IF they told him that it doesnt make any difference if they sell or pass on the debt, as if it is a positive court outcome we would still get our money back?

 

Perfect example of their uncertainty, not only do DCA's like to use 'if, may, might, could, would' etc in their threatogrammes, even the Original Creditor (OC) can't commit themselves because they know only too well it won't end up in court!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't pay anyone anything! If you are in the process of claiming bank charges back from 'IF' then they had no right to sell on your account as a debt.

 

Right, we have a small token payment set up, so should I cancel that?

 

Moorcroft rang here at 8.30pm, i told them we only deal in writing & will not take anymore of their calls, he kept trying to interrupt, so i repeated what i had said & then hung up .. arrogant little s**t he was too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where it states "I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

No just put you have no idea of any debt to moorcr@p

 

And the fact that you are bemused as to why they were sold this debt when it is already in dispute with IF.

 

Who is the token payment set up with? IF or Moorcr@p?

If it is with IF and they have sold it on then cancel all payments and add them to your bank charges claim aswell.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

arrogant little s**t he was too!

 

:D:DExactly why you don't speak to them on the phone, unless your recording it, and baiting them:lol::lol::lol:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, we have a small token payment set up, so should I cancel that?

 

Moorcroft rang here at 8.30pm, i told them we only deal in writing & will not take anymore of their calls, he kept trying to interrupt, so i repeated what i had said & then hung up .. arrogant little s**t he was too!

 

Report them to the OFT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did 'IF' send you a default notice, or notice of assignment? How did you find out Moorcr@p had bought the account?

 

I'm sure their is something I have read about having made an agreement with a company who then sell it on regardless!

It might be in the CPUTR somewhere?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a letter my husband got from IF the other day that stated the debt & their usual threats etc, cant honestly remember IF sending us anything other than the usual letter to re-pay the debt which is when we spoke to them about it being in dispute for the charges etc.

 

Whats CPURT?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...