Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

freinds Husband died. welcome PPI wont cough up + H L Cohen


hitchy1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5387 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My friends husband died suddenly very recently and i have been trying to help her sort the finances.

 

To be honest they had quite a bit of debt and had not been dealing with it.

 

She stands to gain about £50k from a death in service policy and has about £6k in mortgage and other debts.

 

Her husband had a single loan through safestyle windows for home improvements of about £2k through welcome finance.

 

He was in arrears on it and had ignored it.

 

I contacted them as there was a ppi policy attached and also sent them a copy of the death certificate.

 

They have responded through Cohens with the letter below.

 

Will she be liable to settle the debt? and what about the balance being virtually double what he borrowed?

 

cohenwelcomefinance.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the PPI covers death then the PPI covers death and should mean the loan is completely paid off. I think a simple letter stating that should be sufficient.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they want a copy certificate, there's no reason why they should not have one:

 

Dear Vultures

 

I refer to your letter dated 03 July 2009 regarding the late (name of deceased).

 

A copy of the death certificate can be obtained from the Registry Office at (district in which death was registered), upon payment of the statutory fee. If you wish me to provide you with a copy, I will be pleased to do so upon receipt of your cleared payment in respect of the statutory fee and a stamped addressed envelope.

 

Unless you provide more detail about the claim your clients are making upon the estate, including a true copy of the executed credit agreement, I regret that I am unable to assist you.

 

Note that all communication in this matter must be in writing.

 

Yours etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is typical welcome and Cohen

 

even try and intimidate beyond the grave

 

i dont want to throw cold water on this but on some of the welcome t&c, it states if there are arrears on the account, ppi will not be paid

 

cant see how as its more than likely front loaded the payment, that is paid up front in a single premium

 

looking into that at the moment

 

but at the moment just go through the claims procedure

Link to post
Share on other sites

ime going to be a son of a bitch on this one

 

once some one dies

what obligation has the surviving members of the family have to clear the late persons obligations

 

ime not talking joint applications, only single

 

the reason i say this is because this is to do with

welcome and cohen

 

they deserve no respect

Link to post
Share on other sites

shocking, but expected from this bloodsucker

 

I notice you have said you have already sent a certificte, personnaly I would write back and tell them to get their house in order before making spurilous claims

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some firms who are renowned for trying to claim from the dead nuff said:mad:

 

Now is the death benefit paid into a trust of which the spouse/partner is the beneficiary - if so then any payment is not part of the estate & is therefore protected:p Also it would help to know if there's a Will?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
If they want a copy certificate, there's no reason why they should not have one:

 

Today received following correspondence from HL Cohen which came as bit of a shock. Seems that her husband had already received a charging order for this debt which he did not defend and which she didnt know about. The original loan was for £1500 and £600 ppi, yet the order is for over £4000. i have checked the documentation and it was definitely in his name only, but the house was joint names. Even though they know he is deceased the letter was addressed to him. There was no will left and no mortgage insurance which has arrears of £4000, she has just received £30k death in service insurance but has no other income and any pension is meagre.

 

MOD EDIT: have removed the links as they have personal information within them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When You Said Cohen My Senses Started Going And I Thought Welcome Finance

Low And Behold

 

Now To Have A Charging Order, There Must Be A Ccj

 

Did He Have A Loan With These Cretins

I Doubt It Was Car Finance, Was It

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despicable, but hardly surprising, given the level of competence and greed usually demonstrated by Cohens.

 

I'd be inclined to write, as executor, reminding them of the earlier letter informing them of the death, highlighting the distress they have caused, and letting them know that a complaint will be going to the SRA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hitchy

 

You Need To Stay On Top Of This

 

Send Welcome An Sar To Find Out What All This Is About

Cohen Will Just Ignore You As Is The Norm

 

Send To

 

Welcome Financial Services

Ruddington Fields Business Park

Ruddington

Nottingham

Ng11 6nz

 

Send By Recorded Delievery And Enclose A 10 Quid Postel Order

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your killer here is that they 'certify that this document is a true copy of the original....' I would contact the court and see if it is a genuine claim. Given the problems within Welcome at the moment I think this stinks. As it is so 'recent' the original should have been sent to your friend... a complaint to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority should be filed immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As that charging order is dated 16th April and your friends hubby has recently passed away is it fair to say he was ill at the time and this is why he did not appear and defend the order ?

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As that charging order is dated 16th April and your friends hubby has recently passed away is it fair to say he was ill at the time and this is why he did not appear and defend the order ?

 

PF

 

Exactly.

 

If you need to get this set aside, this is the defence.

 

JOgs

Link to post
Share on other sites

As that charging order is dated 16th April and your friends hubby has recently passed away is it fair to say he was ill at the time and this is why he did not appear and defend the order ?

 

PF

 

Very interesting, not something i had thought of. He died on the 2nd May having been ill for a few weeks and was off work at the time. Thing is the charging order is in place so presumably it would need some legal help to try and overturn this, or should i add it to the letter suggested earlier?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting, not something i had thought of. He died on the 2nd May having been ill for a few weeks and was off work at the time. Thing is the charging order is in place so presumably it would need some legal help to try and overturn this, or should i add it to the letter suggested earlier?

 

 

This will have penalty charges, extra interest, everything that is bad about Welcome all over it.

 

A set aside should be quite easy in the circumstances!

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

You Would Have To Have The Ccj Set Asside First Yet You Have Had No Notice Of The Charging Order Let Alone A Ccj

 

 

Me Thinks Cohen Has Been Naughty Again

 

I have found the copy of the charging order amongst my friends paperwork, so that would suggest that it is legal and the copy i posted is the same. Obviously due to his ill health and subsequent death and the fact it was only in his name she has not really bothered to question or understand what it is. The issue now is to proceed to try and have it set aside but i dont know how to do this, do i need to seek legal advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...