Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @unclebulgaria67 your point is particularly valid especially in regards to loss in the event of a claim. Irrespective of 2x SP30’s or not the vehicle is insured for its full market value. The insurers rating changes based on risk against those endorsements, where said risk calculation isn’t made available.    Also I question the validation of 22% in premium. Is that based on today’s risk profiling, or is that applied retrospectively to day 1 and can that be evidenced.    One thing that is very clear, is that to bring about any degree of misrepresentation the insurer has to have evidence that questions were asked in regards to the endorsements.   This was an auto renewal and when I’ve checked the Brokers electronic Copy on “My Policy’ at renewal, there is no section included relative to accidents in the last 5 yrs or Motoring convictions. Everything else relative to me and the named driver is listed. 
    • Here is what exposes Johnson & Co Commission document, makes for sober reading   Wonder if Snake Oil Singham has read and digested it?   https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/brexit_files/info_site/com_2020_324_2_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en_0.pdf
    • Must be a positive if the Insurers are now using the legislation as it was intended. It is just that I have not heard of it being used for Car Insurance, as the 22% comes from the Insurers rating calculations, which is not available information to the Policyholder. With Home Insurance, if you Insured a Building for £100k, when it should have been Insured for £122k, it is easier to grasp.   The Insurers would have issued the policy documents clearly showing that no motoring offences had been included within the premium calculation and the OP has had 5 months to correct the record with Insurers before the accident.   Perhaps probe the Insurers on the 22%. Can they provide evidence from their Underwriting rating guidance that this is the extra premium for 2 SP30's.
    • Moorcroft are just a first DCA that Natwest use, after Natwest have stopped chasing it.   The debt is still owned by Natwest and is currently sat with Moorcroft, but in a pile with many thousands of others.   If your new postal address is showing on your credit file, Moorcroft would have sent letters if they thought this was a priority debt to chase.     
    • We signed up to a credit reference agency.  Got an email this morning saying a search had been carried out in my husband’s name.  It’s by Moorcroft who are doing it on behalf of NatWest. Do we worry?  It’s been over 6 years since last payment and we wrote to NatWest in January advising of our new address.  They and Moorcroft both emailed an old email address which we have access to but never use asking us to confirm our address.  We didn’t respond to it.
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
darreninnz

HSBC-Social Security Administration act 1992

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3893 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

My partner contacted HSBC bank about charges coming out of her account.

She stated that whilst she recieves child/working tax credits the bank are not allowed to take any charges from the account because the Social Security Administration act 1992 section 187 forbids it.

 

It was interesting that after only one phone call to her local branch she recieved a letter from ( someone has mentioned him before ) General Manager UK Operations Jim Large.

 

His letter stated that amongst other things the following paragraphs--

 

"As you will appreciate given the nature of your allegations it has been necessary for the matter to be referred to the bank's legal advisers. Their considered view is that your argument is wrong as a matter of construction of the Act.

 

They state:

 

"You have confused 'charges' in the sense of fees, to which the act has no relevance and 'charges' in the sense of a proprietary right attatching to benefits to which the act relates, but which the levying of fees on overdrafts does not create".

 

I acknowledge that the only source of income into the account is derived from state benefits, however your account is governed by the bank's stipulated terms and conditions and by conducting your account as you have then charges have been deducted from your account".

 

 

 

A few things grab me in this letter, i.e.

 

Earlier in the letter he states the Act is from 1982 not 1992.

"Their considered view"--I'm not interested about their considered view.

It states that she's confused between charges and fees and yet mentions at the end that "charges have been deducted" etc. LOL

 

 

I'd be interested in other peoples advice on the reply i should give to this garbage. I sort of know the reply i'm going to give but still would appreciate any input.

 

Many thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HSBC are 100% correct. SSAA 1992 does NOT apply to bank charges.


.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But i thought the end of the Act states:

 

" And every agreement to assign, or CHARGE such benefit shall be void and on the bancrupcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors".

 

Thanks for your reply-- Do you think i'm barking up the wrong tree? I'm quite new to this so it's all a huge learning curve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But i thought the end of the Act states:

 

" And every agreement to assign, or CHARGE such benefit shall be void and on the bancrupcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors".

 

Thanks for your reply-- Do you think i'm barking up the wrong tree? I'm quite new to this so it's all a huge learning curve.

 

I'll explain or rather I will quote a response to a number 10 petition cos the explanation is better, perhaps. The response also was about the Tax Credit Act 2002.

 

"The purpose of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 Section 187 and section 45 of the Tax Credits Act 2002 is to prevent people’s benefit money being at risk by it being assigned over to a third party in settlement of a debt. It is not intended to prohibit the application of bank charges. Bank charges are in the nature of an expense, and are incurred by the holder of the account; tax credits and benefits are payable in order to help customers meet their expenses, and as such it is legitimate for banks to deduct charges from the balance of an account held in that bank, whether the money paid into the account comes from tax credits, benefits or other sources, such as earnings."

 

I don't think that site rules allows me to link to it but it is the best explanation for it.


.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Yourbank, I'm going to find a way of ripping the bank off instead now ha.

 

Seriously-thanks for your prompt reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for that Yourbank, I'm going to find a way of ripping the bank off instead now ha.

 

Seriously-thanks for your prompt reply.

If you have got bank charges and they have impacted on your ability to pay priority debts(mortgage/rent, council tax, utilities) then you could go the hardship route on bank charges.


.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you have got bank charges and they have impacted on your ability to pay priority debts(mortgage/rent, council tax, utilities) then you could go the hardship route on bank charges.

(Parachute account comes to mind for tax credits MIKE 770)


:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi darreninnz, welcome to the forum :)

 

Thanks for that Yourbank, I'm going to find a way of ripping the bank off instead now ha

 

Mike is right that you should consider a Parachute account , to get your benefits money paid into a completely different bank . This is an acccount which you should use for your everyday Income and Expenditure, but don't go overdrawn .

 

Parachute Account

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/13832-do-you-need-parachute.html

 

It gives you space to work out how you're going to proceed with HSBC , but if they've been applying crippling Bank Charges , you should start reclaiming them .......

 

That will put your account with HSBC 'In Dispute' .... which is a completely different ball game .......

 

Come back if you need more info on this darreninnz , someone will answer and as you've found out already , we're a friendly lot on here :D.

 

But first - the parachute !! LOL


Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heya Darreninnz, my jaw just dropped when I read your post. I too have THE SAME LETTER identical, word by word, from Jim Large as I, like your partner, am in receipt of State Benefits of which they are taking a hefty slice off with charges/fess. After having done some research I feel it is time to close the account with HSBC, find (if there is any) some where ethical to bank with (only for a £5 weekly direct debit that I see myself forced to pay to HIGH COURT ENFORCEMENT DEBT COLLECTORS and deal with HSBC via another route ie- reclaiming bank charges. It worked for another account with HSBC where I had all charges except 1 returned and I closed the account!

 

State benefits can be received via mail and cashed at your local post office. I think its the way to go. The less we rely on banks/loans and the like the more we will have for ourselves. It is all a [problem]! Check out BBC5.tv eyePlayer - Money & Debt and learn all about it!

 

United WE Stand

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...