Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Full and Final Settlement on a Credit Card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5378 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have stupidly run up a large debt (£30K plus) with two credit card companies. Due to reduced income, I will be unable to meet even the minimum payment. Both credit agreements are over 7 years old. I really do not wish to go down the route of trying to have the agreements cancelled because of technicalities; I run the debt up and wish to pay off as much as I can.

 

I will however be in a position to make an offer of paying around 70% of the total debt to both cards by extracting some cash from my pension fund. My thoughts are to write to both card companies offering a full and final settlement without affecting my credit rating. Is this a good idea? Or does anyone have some suggestions for me?

 

Thanks in advance.

Edited by Broomfield
Typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as i can see from the satements i have no charges (such as late penalties) and I have never had PPI or anything similar on the cards. The debt has built up because i stupidly paid only the minimum amount by DD every month over the last umpteen years, as it seems unlikley i will be able to go back into full time work in the forseeable future i would like to pay off these cards as they are my only personal debts. I am using all of the cash advance i can claim from my pension fund. And 70% is the maximum i can pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see your point, i think i will fire off a letter to them asking for a settlement figure but won't sign it.....If i do not get anywhere then i will consider going down the unenforceable CCA route

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really need to put your feelings of guilt far far behind you.

 

You have paid them back twice over with the interest on the account.

 

Send the CCA and see what they come back with. You'll need that pension money when you retire!

 

JOgs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what you mean about the interest, i have just looked at a statement, i have paid the minimum amount of £349.81 and it has reduced my balance by the grand sum of just over £25.00:mad:. I am going to download the template tonight and send off in the morning.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you realise how these companies are absolute fools to themselves. As in your case you want to do the 'fair' thing and pay your debts, but because of their inate greed you have come to the conclusion that 'fairness' should be a two-way street.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what you mean about the interest, i have just looked at a statement, i have paid the minimum amount of £349.81 and it has reduced my balance by the grand sum of just over £25.00:mad:. I am going to download the template tonight and send off in the morning.

Thanks

 

feelings of guilt aside requesting copies of the CCA's will not affect your relationship with them in any way

 

but once you have them if they are (as is likely the older they are ) defective then it will have a major impact on your F & F offers which would be more in the order of 50% or maybe a bit less to keep a clean sheet

Link to post
Share on other sites

okay, let me tell you the easiest way of putting this to you, if you write to a lender and offer them a settlement, they will hold you to it.

 

ring them tell them you are facing bankruptcy and you can either offer them a full and final of £whateever or tell them they will get zilch and they can deal with the receiver, id bet they will accept a full and final and no it wont affect your credit rating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

okay, let me tell you the easiest way of putting this to you, if you write to a lender and offer them a settlement, they will hold you to it.

 

ring them tell them you are facing bankruptcy and you can either offer them a full and final of £whateever or tell them they will get zilch and they can deal with the receiver, id bet they will accept a full and final and no it wont affect your credit rating.

 

best not to stoop to their level and base you arguments or offers upon lies

 

just keep it clean honest and to the point! offers of settlement made "without prejudice" remain confidential

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've made an offer recently but not put without prejudice does it matter.

 

At this stage no. Send the CCA requests to see what leverage you can use against them; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter enclose a £1 postal order, print your name on the letter do not sign it & send recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've made an offer recently but not put without prejudice does it matter.

 

well yes it can matter very much depending on exactly what you have written,

 

if you are challenging the agreement the other side would almost certainly use it to show you accept liability

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying, sorry to hijack. No I am not contesting the agreement, just struggling to pay big time. Hoping to borrow some to get it all cleared.

If you feel I have helped please tickle my scales;)

 

 

MBNA - Ongoing

Egg Loan - Ongoing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying, sorry to hijack. No I am not contesting the agreement, just struggling to pay big time. Hoping to borrow some to get it all cleared.

 

have you not applied for copies of the agreements?

 

you should as this will help determine what you offer and what they are likely to accept

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately my agreements are electronic and as far as i know its a very tricky thing to prove a fake tick box. I have read around extensively and no-one seems to have the answers in how to prove or dis-prove:(

If you feel I have helped please tickle my scales;)

 

 

MBNA - Ongoing

Egg Loan - Ongoing

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...