Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, let us know if they honour the agreement to pay.   Thanks for Donation made and anything further you can make - it helps us keep helping !
    • Mark Bauwens from France takes us through his week during the coronavirus pandemic. View the full article
    • Thankyou very much i will be around all day it would be appreciated Below is another attempt :     IN THE COUNTY COURT AT ***************                 CLAIM NO:**********     BETWEEN:   LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD CLAIMANT   and   MRS *********************** DEFENDANT   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   WITNESS STATEMENT OF ******************   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   I, ******************************************* WILL SAY as follows:   I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim.     INTRODUCTION   1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed 10p to 15p in the £1 and to which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Lowell Portfolio I Ltd issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.   2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   BACKGROUND 3. The Claim relates to an alleged Credit Card Agreement between the defendant and Vanquis Bank   4. Whilst it is accepted that the defendant has in the past had financial dealings with Vanquis, the defendant is unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers, and the defendant has not entered into any contract with the Claimant.   5.The defendant made a formal written request to the Claimant for them to provide me with a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement as entitled to do so under sections 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on the 27th August 2019 along with the standard fee of £1.00 postal order to which the defendant received a reply dated 6th September 2019 putting their account on hold whilst they tried to gather the information.   6.The defendant received a reply dated 24th October 2019 with no CCA attached other than the documents which enclosed a statement, default notice, notice of assignment from Vanquis to Lowell & a reconstituted copy of an agreement which the claimants have already provided in their witness statement dated 3rd August 2020.   7.On 15th January 2020, I received a claim form from the County Court Business Centre, Northampton, for the amount of £******. The claimant contends that the claim is for the sum of £********* in respect of monies owing under an alleged agreement with the account no ******************* pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA). Contained within the claimants particulars the claimant states that the account was subject to assignment from Vanquis to Lowell on 24 June 2015 with notice given.   CONCLUSION 8.To date no valid full true copy of the executed credit agreement or the terms and conditions have been disclosed .the claimant has no grounds on which to enforce this alleged debt.   9.The claimant disclosed various screenshots taken from the originators software of the application and also confirms on their covering letter the relative legislation The Electronic Communications Act 2000 with regards to wet signatures and the requirement of a tick box to validate the application. The screenshots are devoid of any tick box or any authenticity of IP address conformation check.   10.Therefore the claimant remains in default of my section 78 request and pursuant to section 78 6a of the CCA1974 the claimant is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.   11.For the above reasons the claim bought by the claimant is without merit and an abuse of the court process. It would be far more gracious and forthright for the claimant to admit that they do not have possession of the correct valid paperwork and this is an attempt to mislead and convince the court that the claimant can disclose the legal valid documents on which its claim relies on. It is therefore requested that the Claimants Claim is struck out pursuant to the above.   STATEMENT OF TRUTH   I, ************** the defendant, believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of Court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   Signed: …………………………………………… Print Name: ************* Dated: 4th August 2020
    • Allen Blue, who co-founded professional network LinkedIn, reveals how start-ups can achieve growth. View the full article
    • for want of clarity   this potential £5k is only available in England.    
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 8 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
iseo94

first direct wont send SAR/data protection without signature

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3324 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Can anyone shed some light? I have sent SAR to first direct with fee but without signature. They have replied that they need a signature to verify identity. I have replied that the law does not require me to sign anything but I am willing to go to a local branch and provide proof of id in the form of a passport. FD replied no can do. Only when they receive my signature and have verified it, they will then have forty days to comply.

Has anyone experienced this avoidance tactic?

Any ideas?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

You could try sending them this...........

 

Dear Sir,

 

You have stipulated that you require proof of my identity/signature before you comply with my Subject Access Request, may I bring the following to your attention;

 

Data Protection Act Good Practice Notes:

 

2. Do you have enough information to be sure of the requester’s identity?

Often you will have no reason to doubt a person’s identity. For example, if a person with whom you have regular contact sends a letter from their known address it may be safe to assume that they are who they say they are.

 

Suffice to say that if the Information Commissioners Office are satisfied that if you have previously corresponded with me at this address then it is reasonable that I am the person I say I am, therefore there is no leglislation nor guidelines that you can hide behind in an attempt to avoid fullfilling my legal request.

 

If you still fail to comply to my legal request, I will have no other option than to complain to the Information Commissioners Office & if my complaint is upheld you will be liable to a £5000 fine.

 

Yours,

Print name do not sign.

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.


 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much Maroondevo52 for your speedy reply.

Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have moved address, but I have been corresponding with three different debt collection agencies at my current address and have been paying a nominal amount since 2006!

My drivers licence is still in my old address for id, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Send the letter and see what they come back with.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.


 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok Scott, will do.

I have been fighting to keep the vulchures from my door since 2006 and finally had the good fortune to find this website. I have been trawling through these forums, many many hours of informative reading! since january and have finally taken the plunge.

Thanks again for your support and i'll let you know what Ms Howard at First Direct has to say about this letter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Glad you find this site helpfull :) I know when I found it, I was in deep trouble and not sure which way to turn.

 

Thankfully I can now see the 'light' at the end of the tunnel.

 

Good luck with that.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

  • Haha 1

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

first direct have replied with

 

"thank for your letter of 7 july 2009.

i note that despite our numerous letters asking you to provide a valid signature to enable us to authenticate your request,we continue to receive correspondence either unsigned or with an invalid signature (i printed my name).

failure to provide the required information will result in any furture correspondence being destroyed without responce,as we would be unable to fulfil our obligations under the data protection act.

yours sincerely

janet brook"

 

WOW! so if i dont send a signature in ms brook will bin all future letters!

do i report FD to information commissioner now?

just to clarify, i have offered to go to a branch of hsbc (fd & hsbc being one and same) with passport in hand, i have been corresponding with numerous debt collectors acting on behalf of fd for 3 years, i have been paying a nominal amount to fd from this address for 3 years.

i think fd have been banging on charges left right and centre and i dont think they have a valid signed agreement.

the debts in question are a loan, credit card and overdraft.

would appreciate any feedback

thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Looks like, janet brook's not to happy with you :)

 

Have you seen this...............

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/announcement.php?f=24&a=162

 

Maybe worth a punt for £4

 

Regards.

 

Scott.


 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi scott

thanks for the post but i cant open the link. Is there another way to view the page?

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this............

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/digitalsignature.php

 

Regards.

 

Scott.


 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you scott, all done.

do you think this is absolutely secure?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Don't think we'd advertise it if it was'nt.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.


 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

Don't think we'd advertise it if it was'nt.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

 

 

Hi,

 

I have had the same problem with the lady you mentioned, it took me 4 attempts to attain my DPA info in the end. You DO NOT have to send you signature to the lady in question :mad:. I believe these are delay tactics used by FD.

 

If you would like me to send you details on my letters, upon which they did eventually supply my DPA notes then please contact me directly - I don't wish to add the letters here as then FD would know my identity (and I still have outstanding issues with them and their DCA (Metropolitan) & DG chasing me when the account is in dispute!).

 

Don't give up! I had a perfect account history for over 15 years until I became disabled and unable to work. The vultures were relentless after just 3 months, making my illness worse. I won't let them get me down, and neither should anyone else. We just have to stand up for our rights!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, letters have hit the mat from fredrickson so have bitten the bullet and sent ms brooks a letter with a secure signature.

lets see what happens (am a big time conspiracy theorist, and am bracing myself, lol):(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

quick update, reply from Fd says that they have contacted information commissioner and have been told to quote sec 7 para 3 data protection act, which states, in short, they have the right to satisfy themselves of who I am. She is also saying that i have not supplied a valid signature, although i did send the last request with a security signature.

i'm going to write a letter to the information comm' stating that i have sent a signature, albeit one on a security strip,i have offered to collect from a branch with a passport and confirming that i have been in contact with a dca for past 3 years and paying instalments for that time.i'm hoping he'll contact Fd & give them a kick up the you know where. i'll also send a copy to Fd & see what happens.

if anyone has anymore ideas, i'd appreciate your input :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, complaint form finally completed, (4 attempts to send web complaints form timed out, changed all formats of letters to attach, then changed back again to print!total 5 hours 35 mins!yey!)sending by post today with all correspondance with Fd.

also sending a copy to Fd:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

I received a standard aknowledgement letter from the commissioner re complaint on 3 september and a letter from fredrickson stating that they are putting case on hold until they are in receipt of instructions from their client (first direct) back in August but i've received nothing from first direct.

has anyone got any suggestions?

should i go for court order forcing disclosuer pursuant to cpr31.16?

i really want to keep up the momentum, anyone's thoughts would be greatly appreciated.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest HeftyHippo

news?

 

has the ICO done anything?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also experiencing the same problem with two banks I have sent SAR requests to. I sent off the letters on 02/10/10 and received a reply yesterday and today asking for signatures. I use a different name to what the accounts were held in and live at a different address but sent them a copy of my old passport (in the name the know me) decree absolute and birth certificate. Can anybody help with a template letter or legislation I can quote to go back to them please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I'm having problems with FD who are saying they will not process my SAr request due to not verifying signature. I don't want to speak to them on the phone. I wrote and offered to go into my local HSBC with passport etc. They said no. I wrote and said that there was no legal obligation for me to provide a signature, but they are just refusing. How can I proceed?? Does anyone have any ideas as to what I can write to get them to comply??

 

Kittie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am in situation like yours. I think that you may be able to send A Drivers Licence with sig blotted out or a passport.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wanting to push in on your thread here but i am also defending a county court claim that is presently stayed pending them complying with my CPR Request . I informed them that they have not kept to the rules regarding banking practice.

They have responded by making a request to the court to amend thier particulars of Claim.

Any advice ? no replies re this issue from other sections of the forum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I feel for you, banks just seem to make the rules up for themselves. I would write to the judge about it. Surely you will get to see their new particulars of claim. What was the basis of their original claim? ie what documents are they relying on? Have you put in any counter claim?

 

Best

 

Kittie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again, Thanks for reply .The claim was brought under a bank account facility and I only had a credit card with them. They closed the crdit card and tried to off set to a bank account which i didnt hav.So they opened up a new account for the sole purpose of getting out of their legal obligation under the consumer credit act and at the same time trying to deny me my legal right under the same act. As you may know banking law is very different and very much in favour of the banks

They can legally 'of set' the arrears on a credit card by taking money from another account if you have one with the same bank. but in my case they invented one and i pointed this out . so now they are rushing to amend their original claim that is presently stayed back to a credit card that the initially terminated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...