Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, let us know if they honour the agreement to pay.   Thanks for Donation made and anything further you can make - it helps us keep helping !
    • Mark Bauwens from France takes us through his week during the coronavirus pandemic. View the full article
    • Thankyou very much i will be around all day it would be appreciated Below is another attempt :     IN THE COUNTY COURT AT ***************                 CLAIM NO:**********     BETWEEN:   LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD CLAIMANT   and   MRS *********************** DEFENDANT   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   WITNESS STATEMENT OF ******************   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   I, ******************************************* WILL SAY as follows:   I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim.     INTRODUCTION   1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed 10p to 15p in the £1 and to which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Lowell Portfolio I Ltd issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.   2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   BACKGROUND 3. The Claim relates to an alleged Credit Card Agreement between the defendant and Vanquis Bank   4. Whilst it is accepted that the defendant has in the past had financial dealings with Vanquis, the defendant is unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers, and the defendant has not entered into any contract with the Claimant.   5.The defendant made a formal written request to the Claimant for them to provide me with a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement as entitled to do so under sections 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on the 27th August 2019 along with the standard fee of £1.00 postal order to which the defendant received a reply dated 6th September 2019 putting their account on hold whilst they tried to gather the information.   6.The defendant received a reply dated 24th October 2019 with no CCA attached other than the documents which enclosed a statement, default notice, notice of assignment from Vanquis to Lowell & a reconstituted copy of an agreement which the claimants have already provided in their witness statement dated 3rd August 2020.   7.On 15th January 2020, I received a claim form from the County Court Business Centre, Northampton, for the amount of £******. The claimant contends that the claim is for the sum of £********* in respect of monies owing under an alleged agreement with the account no ******************* pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA). Contained within the claimants particulars the claimant states that the account was subject to assignment from Vanquis to Lowell on 24 June 2015 with notice given.   CONCLUSION 8.To date no valid full true copy of the executed credit agreement or the terms and conditions have been disclosed .the claimant has no grounds on which to enforce this alleged debt.   9.The claimant disclosed various screenshots taken from the originators software of the application and also confirms on their covering letter the relative legislation The Electronic Communications Act 2000 with regards to wet signatures and the requirement of a tick box to validate the application. The screenshots are devoid of any tick box or any authenticity of IP address conformation check.   10.Therefore the claimant remains in default of my section 78 request and pursuant to section 78 6a of the CCA1974 the claimant is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.   11.For the above reasons the claim bought by the claimant is without merit and an abuse of the court process. It would be far more gracious and forthright for the claimant to admit that they do not have possession of the correct valid paperwork and this is an attempt to mislead and convince the court that the claimant can disclose the legal valid documents on which its claim relies on. It is therefore requested that the Claimants Claim is struck out pursuant to the above.   STATEMENT OF TRUTH   I, ************** the defendant, believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of Court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   Signed: …………………………………………… Print Name: ************* Dated: 4th August 2020
    • Allen Blue, who co-founded professional network LinkedIn, reveals how start-ups can achieve growth. View the full article
    • for want of clarity   this potential £5k is only available in England.    
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 8 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
Azer

Exploited/Discriminated - What to do?

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4045 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

...............

Edited by Azer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you know what other people were paid for doing your job?

 

Have you asked why you didn't get the IT or year end bonus?


Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How "senior" to you were the other previous employees in the posts you took up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies!

 

How do you know what other people were paid for doing your job?

 

I used to do the non-trading related company accounts in the first 3 years of my employment and still have access to all the bank/company statements. As well as all official internal company correspondence.

 

Have you asked why you didn't get the IT or year end bonus?

 

Fort the IT work, the MD just shrugged me off as in "he couldn't give a ****".

 

Regarding the year end bonus, I have not yet asked, but I will be getting my passport back from my solicitor today with my ILR endorsed and have a word with the MD about this whole issue. Will update here later today.

 

How "senior" to you were the other previous employees in the posts you took up?

 

They were in the job 3 or so years before me, but in terms of workload I did more than they did, about a 55/45 % split. Furthermore, the whole time during my employment up till Jan 2009 I was also acting as the MD's PA, for this I received nothing.

 

As a side note, because of our filing and communications system I can easily prove that I did the bulk of the work and acted as the MD's PA. If thats of any relevance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to be careful how you approach your MD about this. He may not be too happy about how you have been using / accessing company accounting information on his time.

 

It's possible he may come back at you with you weren't worth as much as the previous employees so he paid you less - So was your work as good as theirs? If not, I wouldn't pay you the same.:( - and after this, I would probably try and find a way to get rid of you.

 

Devil's advocate of course...

Edited by kurvaface
friday grammar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You will need to be careful how you approach your MD about this. He may not be too happy about how you have been using / accessing company accounting information on his time.

 

It's possible he may come back at you with you weren't worth as much as the previous employees so he paid you less - So was your work as good as theirs. If not, I wouldn't pay you the same.:( - and after this, I would probably try and find a way to get rid of you.

 

Devil's advocate of course...

 

Yeah, I figure he will try something like that. However, I can categorically prove that my quality of work is better than the people that I replaced, of course he will just ignore this fact if he wants. I will keep my sources regarding accounting info secret, will just say I had a discussion with the other employees about this. But there is no way he can justify paying an inexperienced ops manager who I am supposed to supervise more than me. Thats just blatantly BS. But yeah, lets see how my chat with him goes first.

 

Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful.

 

But there is no way he can justify paying an inexperienced ops manager who I am supposed to supervise more than me.

 

Remember, the MD is not in business for your benefit. His dividend and his family (Stepson) will come way before you every time so mind you don't get his back up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be very careful here. Accessing/discussing confidential staff information without authorisation can lead to disciplinary action; and simply saying that you had a discussion with other employees could get them into trouble as well. Also, if asked, these employees could turn around and say that they did not talk to you about this information and you could be in deep doo-doo.

 

At the end of the day, the MD can decide how much he pays to each employee unless the company has a collective agreement on pay and pay scales.

 

The tone of your original posting does sound a bit like sour grapes.


Frederickson - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - Lost - Claiming back from post office

Connaught Collections - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - No Agreement - returned to client

Lowell - CCA sent 11/4/07 - No agreement - returned to client

Moorcroft - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - No Agreement - returned to client

Red Castle - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - Copy returned but no T&C's

Robinson Way - CCA Sent 16/5/07

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice, I will revert soon.

 

But, I do think I am being taken for a ride, I do the bulk of this companies trading and get paid the least. If thats considered fair, well, I guess I will have to quit soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am the only non-white, asian origin Muslim in the company and I feel that I am being deliberatly exploited and discriminated against. However, there has been no overt racial or any other derogotory remarks or otherwise made towards me.

 

Do you mind me asking - what has this got to do with anything?

 

Its sounds a bit like -

 

"Is it coz I is BLACK?"

 

No offence.... surely if the MD thought you were worth the money he would pay you more. I'm afraid I agree with Borisbeaver:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you mind me asking - what has this got to do with anything?

 

Its sounds a bit like -

 

"Is it coz I is BLACK?"

 

No offence.... surely if the MD thought you were worth the money he would pay you more. I'm afraid I agree with Borisbeaver:(

 

Well, like I say. If I am doing most of the work and getting paid the least. My quality of work is better than my predecessors and yet I get paid the least... well, it seems that I am being discriminated against. The only difference between me and the others is my ethnicity. So not really even a stretch there. Of course my opinion is biased.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you measure the quality of your work?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How do you measure the quality of your work?

 

I work in logistics, primarily to do with shipping, high value and high volumes. My turnover is quicker due to less mistakes and better knowledge of the financial instruments than my predecessors, which in turn means that the Co can do more business. On top of this, I am supposed to train/supervise the new guy so that he can do the same job as me, he has no experience, has not done any of this work yet, but gets paid more than me. Makes no sense to me and I dont really see how they can expect me to show him anything with this sort of treatment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps you should go to an employment tribunal....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps you should go to an employment tribunal....

 

Yeah, thats what I was thinking. But on what grounds would an ET be, discrimination?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my current job, I do a lot more work than my supervisor, who is about as much use a a chocolate fire guard. My supervisor slopey shoulders all of their work to me and takes a lot of praise. Sound's familiar?

 

If you don't like the pay you are receiving, then you could always find another job that pays better.


Frederickson - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - Lost - Claiming back from post office

Connaught Collections - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - No Agreement - returned to client

Lowell - CCA sent 11/4/07 - No agreement - returned to client

Moorcroft - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - No Agreement - returned to client

Red Castle - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - Copy returned but no T&C's

Robinson Way - CCA Sent 16/5/07

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am the only non-white, asian origin Muslim in the company and I feel that I am being deliberatly exploited and discriminated against. However, there has been no overt racial or any other derogotory remarks or otherwise made towards me.

 

I don't get why you think being an Asian Muslim is the route of your pay difference. Unless you are all clones I don't see why other people's pay is any of your business.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does your boss know that you are a Muslim? Do you have to interrupt your work to pray or something? In which case he should pay you less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In my current job, I do a lot more work than my supervisor, who is about as much use a a chocolate fire guard. My supervisor slopey shoulders all of their work to me and takes a lot of praise. Sound's familiar?

 

If you don't like the pay you are receiving, then you could always find another job that pays better.

 

Yeah, does sound familiar, but its still unfair.

 

I will do once the job market picks up again.

 

I don't get why you think being an Asian Muslim is the route of your pay difference. Unless you are all clones I don't see why other people's pay is any of your business.

 

I just think its unfair that I do the work, better faster and more of it at a cheaper price than my predecessors, yet some kid can come in of the street and without any effort, experience or actual work done can get paid more than me.

 

The reason my boss knows I am Muslim is because of my name and the fact that I am the only non-white person at work and look kinda different. I dont have any other reason to think why the MD would create such disparity in his employees wages. It seems pretty simple, I am different to the rest of the comapny, I get treated differently. Work wise he cant fault me and I can easily prove it to him or anyone. I dont see any other reason for him treating me this way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Azer,

 

Am very sorry about the situation you are going through. At the end of the day, the question you need to answer is how do you expect this story to end - there are 2 possible endings - one end would be to go to a tribunal and irrespective of the tribunal's outtcome( and an uphill one at that) you continue to work, after which your employer will definitely have a black mark against you which may or may not create issues in the future - the other option is to actively seek employement outside and prove to your current employer your worth when you get another offer - that is possibly the best negotiation option you would get - if your MD values your services he will retain you else you have another job in hand anyways. Whether the MD follows discriminatory practices , he/she would have to put all that aside when trying to retain an employee who will leave if not treated equally - since at the end of the day its his business..if other employees are not as competitive and agressive the final loss is the MDs. Hope this helps.

 

There rarely exists a perfect company where a person can effect perfect employement.

 

Just My thoughts,

George.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case you should go for the tribunal. You would need a backup job in place and you should try and seek renumeration for previous years too.

 

I think approaching your boss about this should be after you have another job in place because in this climate it would be really easy for him to let you go and only then should you use the tribunal option.

 

I still think you have a problem with snooping into accounts etc. If you did that in my company you would be out..... immediately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And it would be the same for example if you were using work time and computers to go on CAG.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And it would be the same for example if you were using work time and computers to go on CAG.
But only if the company had an Internet usage policy..:lol:

Frederickson - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - Lost - Claiming back from post office

Connaught Collections - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - No Agreement - returned to client

Lowell - CCA sent 11/4/07 - No agreement - returned to client

Moorcroft - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - No Agreement - returned to client

Red Castle - CCA Sent 11/4/07 - Copy returned but no T&C's

Robinson Way - CCA Sent 16/5/07

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your views everyone. I think I will just wait for the new season to start and for the newbie to shoot himself in the foot. They then will have to rely on me to get things done, which I will if they meet my demands. Will also start looking for another job meanwhile.

 

Regarding snooping.. well, its not so much snooping as their carelessness.

 

But only if the company had an Internet usage policy..:lol:

 

Yep :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding snooping.. well, its not so much snooping as their carelessness.

 

You may wish to justify it to yourself like that, but it is snooping and may even potentially move into criminal activity within the realms of the Computer Misuse Act.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...