Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Possible violation of TUPE laws


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5403 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I work for an artwork house that is based in Manchester, my role is Onsite support at a food manufacturer in Middlesex I liaise between the marketing staff and my company and work on a desk on the clients site I am the only employee of my company doing this and I work 5 days a week

 

In March we lost the contract and a new company would take over in July and I was advised verbally that my employment would continue with the new employer under TUPE.

 

As yet I have had one meeting with the new company and this was just to confirm my contract details I had nothing in writing to say that I would be TUPED until I complained to my existing employer who sent out a letter last week, and nothing was said in the meeting about my continued employment only that they were in the process of working out how they would service the client .

 

Now as I understand it the new company has to keep me on with the same COE but only IF the job that I do transfers ( in other word if the new company will have an on site person doing the job that I do) If not they will have to make me redundant.

 

Last week the marketing staff were introduced to an employee of the new company who is already doing work for them and will be on site 3 days a week the employee in question was introduced as an Account Director

( My Job title is Pack Change Manager)

 

I am due to have a meeting with the new company this week

 

Questions

 

If they had decided they only needed an on site 3 days a week should I have been offered the opportunity to reduce my days?

 

They made a point of asking me my age at the interview ( I am 54) so I am worried about age discrimination

 

I am on a three months notice period and if made redundant would prefer to have this as part of my payments as my travelling costs etc is £100 per week so I would be better of with the money then working out a 3 months notice period, can I insist on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Given that you work only for this one client, the regulations class you as The TUPE arrangements would be service provision changes and as such you are transferred to the new supplier automatically with your existing contract, terms & conditions.

 

The only window for the new supplier to change your t&c's or to let you go would be due to an "economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce".

 

So in answer to your first question; yes, if they are only providing on-site services three days a week as part of their contract, this should have been offered to you first.

 

This is a lovely big loophole that I can imagine the inscrupulous making the most of.

 

Secondly, the age question is worrying. No valid reason for them to ask this.

 

Finally, no you can't insist on the pay in lieu of notice. If you refuse the transfer for whatever reason you are deemed to have resigned & no redundancy payments are payable. You don't mention how long you've been with your employer but aged 40+ statutory payments are a week & a half's pay for every year's service (provided you are more than 2 years in post naturally). I'd suggest caution when exploring this as you don't want them to misconstrue anything & assume you're rejecting to be transfered.

 

Hope this helps a little; personally I'd get on the phone to Acas or someone

 

Good luck!

"Evancosmo" is short for the evanescent cosmopolite.

 

THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE :rolleyes:

 

1st Credit: CCA request sent

Cabot: failed to provide CCA - s.10 DPA letter sent

Capquest#1: failed to provide CCA - s.10 DPA letter sent

Capquest#2: failed to provide CCA - s.10 DPA letter sent

Abbey: on going

Equifax: "attributable data" CCJ removed - Aug 09

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your answer

I will wait for my meeting and see what they say

My existing employer is also a bit worried they asked my age

I'm not being funny, but do you maybe look older than you are?

They might be thinking you're not far off retirement age or on the other hand you might look so young they think that you'll be around for ages yet or maybe they think you're younger than you are and you wont have too many problems finding work elsewhere

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i was tuped my employer paid my solicitor fees worth looking in too

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not being funny, but do you maybe look older than you are?

They might be thinking you're not far off retirement age or on the other hand you might look so young they think that you'll be around for ages yet or maybe they think you're younger than you are and you wont have too many problems finding work elsewhere

 

I do look younger than my age but that may not mean I can easliy find a job if made redundant

 

My husband is 60 looks 50 but has been out of work since march

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Sorry can you clarify something, you say the company you work for lost the contract, and the new company is offering you a position.

The reason I ask is I wonder if this is really covered by TUPE, the new company are not taking over a business they simply have tendered for and awarded the contract, and could just replace you without having to do anything.

You could send a PM with a link to your thread to one of the forum contributers with HR experience.

 

Andy

Edited by old_andrew2007
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry can you clarify something, you say the company you work for lost the contract, and the new company is offering you a position.

The reason I ask is I wonder if this is really covered by TUPE, the new company are not taking over a business they simply have tendered for and awarded the contract, and could just replace you without having to do anything.

You could send a PM with a link to your thread to one of the forum contributers with HR experience.

 

Andy

 

The company I work for has lost the contract but I have been told in writing that I am covered by TUPE, however the new company has not told me if I have a job with them or wether they are just going to be responsible for my Redundancy payment

 

If they are having an onsite ( someone doing my job) then it seems that they have already decided to use one of their current employees instead me

 

I am not sure who to PM on this forum but thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi

sorry about the late reply, I am aware of the following members they are elche, ell-enn, and sidewinder,

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Madamfluff,

 

Briefly, I don't have a great deal to add to evancosmo's earlier post at this stage.

 

Seems that this could be a service provision change.

 

One thing is for certain TUPE either applies or it does not - it is not for the tranferor or transferee to decide this - it is a question of fact in each case.

 

Thus assuming this is a SPC covered by TUPE, then on the effective date of transfer you become an employee of the new company fact.

 

What is less clear is if the new company can bring your dismissal within the ETO exception if they do dismiss you.

 

Personally i think, it is your treatment after the transfer that you should seek advice on, and do come back when you are more certain what will happen after the EDT.

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...