Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, let us know if they honour the agreement to pay.   Thanks for Donation made and anything further you can make - it helps us keep helping !
    • Mark Bauwens from France takes us through his week during the coronavirus pandemic. View the full article
    • Thankyou very much i will be around all day it would be appreciated Below is another attempt :     IN THE COUNTY COURT AT ***************                 CLAIM NO:**********     BETWEEN:   LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD CLAIMANT   and   MRS *********************** DEFENDANT   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   WITNESS STATEMENT OF ******************   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   I, ******************************************* WILL SAY as follows:   I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim.     INTRODUCTION   1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed 10p to 15p in the £1 and to which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Lowell Portfolio I Ltd issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.   2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   BACKGROUND 3. The Claim relates to an alleged Credit Card Agreement between the defendant and Vanquis Bank   4. Whilst it is accepted that the defendant has in the past had financial dealings with Vanquis, the defendant is unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers, and the defendant has not entered into any contract with the Claimant.   5.The defendant made a formal written request to the Claimant for them to provide me with a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement as entitled to do so under sections 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on the 27th August 2019 along with the standard fee of £1.00 postal order to which the defendant received a reply dated 6th September 2019 putting their account on hold whilst they tried to gather the information.   6.The defendant received a reply dated 24th October 2019 with no CCA attached other than the documents which enclosed a statement, default notice, notice of assignment from Vanquis to Lowell & a reconstituted copy of an agreement which the claimants have already provided in their witness statement dated 3rd August 2020.   7.On 15th January 2020, I received a claim form from the County Court Business Centre, Northampton, for the amount of £******. The claimant contends that the claim is for the sum of £********* in respect of monies owing under an alleged agreement with the account no ******************* pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA). Contained within the claimants particulars the claimant states that the account was subject to assignment from Vanquis to Lowell on 24 June 2015 with notice given.   CONCLUSION 8.To date no valid full true copy of the executed credit agreement or the terms and conditions have been disclosed .the claimant has no grounds on which to enforce this alleged debt.   9.The claimant disclosed various screenshots taken from the originators software of the application and also confirms on their covering letter the relative legislation The Electronic Communications Act 2000 with regards to wet signatures and the requirement of a tick box to validate the application. The screenshots are devoid of any tick box or any authenticity of IP address conformation check.   10.Therefore the claimant remains in default of my section 78 request and pursuant to section 78 6a of the CCA1974 the claimant is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.   11.For the above reasons the claim bought by the claimant is without merit and an abuse of the court process. It would be far more gracious and forthright for the claimant to admit that they do not have possession of the correct valid paperwork and this is an attempt to mislead and convince the court that the claimant can disclose the legal valid documents on which its claim relies on. It is therefore requested that the Claimants Claim is struck out pursuant to the above.   STATEMENT OF TRUTH   I, ************** the defendant, believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of Court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   Signed: …………………………………………… Print Name: ************* Dated: 4th August 2020
    • Allen Blue, who co-founded professional network LinkedIn, reveals how start-ups can achieve growth. View the full article
    • for want of clarity   this potential £5k is only available in England.    
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 8 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
greatburdon

Do not sign letters?

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4028 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

The advice has always been to refuse signing any letters to OC's or DCA's. Having been quoted this paragraph by a bank who is right?

 

"Please note that according to the Data Protection Act (section 7(3)d 1998, a Data Controller is not obliged to comply with a request unless they are supplied with such information as they may reasonably require in order to satisfy themselves as to the identity of the person making the request. We require any requests to provide personal information to be made in writing and signed so that we can verify the identity of the person making the request."

 

Have they adapted a section of the Data Protection Act to suit themselves or do they have a point?

 

greatburdon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The argument goes that they have already satisfied themselves about your identity by writing to you and disclosing info to you at your address.

 

There are lots of ways of getting around this by altering your signature slightly so you know if they have copied it. I have seen recently on here a background you can download on which you write your signature and it can't be copied.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dear Sir/Madam,

 

RE Account NO XXXXXXXX

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xxxx the contents of which are noted

 

In your letter you make reference to requiring my signed authorisation before you comply. I draw your attention to the fact that the Consumer Credit Act 1974 does not require that I supply you a copy of my signature before you comply with my S78 request.

 

If it is for Data Protection purposes then I can happily supply you with documentation to substantiate my identity to you.

 

However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.I have to ask if you are concerned that you are corresponding with the correct person why has it taken so long to raise this matter.

 

As you are aware, disclosing data without adequate checks of identity is contrary to the 7th principal of data protection, listed in schedule 1 of the Data protection Act 1998:

 

7. Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.

 

My request for a true copy of my credit agreement under section 78 was made on xx/xx/xxxx and the 12 working days for your compliance expire on xx/xx/xxxx. I note that there is no provision that removes the requirements of the act to provide this information on time, even if you are unsure of my identity.

 

I look forward to receiving the documentation requested.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

;)


:)I am not an expert, but I can give good advice about Brighthouse:)

 

Am learning more and more about DCA's too :)

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

 

<------If you think I have been helpful, please feel free to tip my scales - remember to put your CAG name though!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that letter Clemma, it makes the position much clearer.

 

My thoughts were that if you go in front of a District Judge and the other side made the argument that the reason for non-compliance was because of The Data Protection Act i.e. they could not because letters were unsigned or initialed,then the likelyhood would be agreement from the DJ that a sig. would be required.

 

Therefore it may be that at some point to keep things moving and get the required info a signature has to be given even if it is slightly altered or signed in an 'anti-tamper' box.

 

greatburdon

Edited by greatburdon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just sign and put a line through it

 

or do a digital signature

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
just sign and put a line through it

 

or do a digital signature

 

Lloyds TSB are refusing to deal with me because i have used digital signature, I'm dealing with my aunt's loan account.


Just remember to keep smiling and ask if you need help. :-)

 

I can't read and I can't write, but that don't really matter, cos I come from Lincolnshire, and I can drive a tractor.

CCA sent to robinson way Halifax cc. 22/02/07~Sold on to Aktiv Kapital~How can you take them seriously when they can't spell properly

Data Protection Act sent to HBOS Current Account 22/02/07~All quiet

Over 2 yaers I've been a member~Doesn`t time fly when your having fun~or beating DCA's at their own game

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/206908-digital-signatures.html#post2257146

 

2nd post down

 

The link is not working

Edited by daarab

Just remember to keep smiling and ask if you need help. :-)

 

I can't read and I can't write, but that don't really matter, cos I come from Lincolnshire, and I can drive a tractor.

CCA sent to robinson way Halifax cc. 22/02/07~Sold on to Aktiv Kapital~How can you take them seriously when they can't spell properly

Data Protection Act sent to HBOS Current Account 22/02/07~All quiet

Over 2 yaers I've been a member~Doesn`t time fly when your having fun~or beating DCA's at their own game

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well sign it like i said and put a line through it

 

i can confirm a certain finance co did copy my signature

got a graphologist report in court to confirm

 

photo shop is just to easy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed postggj I would do thinks differently regarding my signature if I was starting now.

 

Due to the delays that not signing causes I would use a slightly amended signature in an anti-tamper box (or put a line through) just to cut out the 'we dont know who you are' argument.

 

greatburdon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if you sign and put a line through it its still very easy to delete just the line in photoshop.

 

I'd be inclined to use a digital signature - or a proper anti tamper box

 

Hugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PRINT signature at all times DO NOT SIGN.

If they refuse to deal with you, tough on them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a design currently being discussed with the Site team, who I am hoping will be making a CAG one. I for one will be happy to make a contribution to CAG's coffers to keep the site running!:D

ANTITAMPERSIGN.jpg


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with mr ton on this - they have no right to ask for your signature for a CCA request. The clock is ticking. Just send the letter I posted above and don't sign it.

 

The only time they could request proof is for a SAR -and that's the only time I would suggest you send them anything!


:)I am not an expert, but I can give good advice about Brighthouse:)

 

Am learning more and more about DCA's too :)

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

 

<------If you think I have been helpful, please feel free to tip my scales - remember to put your CAG name though!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bazooka it been done and awaiting approval,


NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bazooka it been done and awaiting approval,

 

Whoo hoo! I approve!:D:D:D


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same thing. I did a SAR on GE Money and used a digital signature. They refused to comply with the SAR unless I provide an original signature. (I needed to do a SAR in the first place as there was doubt that they actually had a signature on an agreement, so I didn't want to provide a signature of course that could be copied and pasted)

I complained to the ICO and guess what-- ICO agreed with GE Money. Apparently they could ask me for any identification THEY liked and I had to comply if I wanted the documents from them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I complained to the ICO and guess what-- ICO agreed with GE Money. Apparently they could ask me for any identification THEY liked and I had to comply if I wanted the documents from them.

 

That does not surprise me at all!

The ICO are about as much use as the OFT, I hope you didn't oblige the GE money with a signature?

Have you made a formal complaint to the ICO for giving you incorrect information?

Clowns!:mad:Complaints - Privacy & electronic communication - ICO


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I didn't send them an original signature and wrote to the ICO again, complaining. They just wrote back and said their decision was final and they wouldn't open the case again. GE Money was allowed to ask for ANY reasonable form of ID they wanted and I had to comply if I wanted to access the relevant documents. So GE Money insisted I send them a proper signature which I couldn't do as I knew what they most likely would do with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a Subject Access Request to Abbey recently and i never signed the request but they gave me all the information without question. I think some companies are just awkward.


:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, I didn't send them an original signature and wrote to the ICO again, complaining. They just wrote back and said their decision was final and they wouldn't open the case again. GE Money was allowed to ask for ANY reasonable form of ID they wanted and I had to comply if I wanted to access the relevant documents. So GE Money insisted I send them a proper signature which I couldn't do as I knew what they most likely would do with it.

 

Don't let that put you off, they are answerable to the public, just because they are happy with their explanation on their side doesn't mean that you are:mad:

 

Ring them again and ask them for their Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and make a complaint to these aswell:How to Complain

  • Haha 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for that link for the Digital Signature. I might never have to sign anything ever again!!


:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for that link for the Digital Signature. I might never have to sign anything ever again!!

 

Even better and something I have just purchased is this;)

The Consumer Forums - Announcements in Forum : Debt Collection Industry


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...