Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Who knows about access onto driveways??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm on the end of a terrace in a Close and our drives are made up a little oddly. As you look at the houses there is an 'L' shape made up of our drive on the right (the short bit of the 'L'), then our garden taking up the corner of the 'L', then the other two drives next to our garden on the long bit. The 'L' has the long bit along the top and the short bit pointing down on the right. Any of this making sense so far?

 

Anyway, our neighbour on the end, who rented the property a few months ago has 4 cars. They frequently park slightly over the end of their drive which causes me a fair bit of hassle when I try and get out of ours, so I have to manoeuvre around rather than getting straight out. This is annoying, but apart from the couple of times they've managed to do it enough to properly block me in (I wasn't going out so it didn't matter then) not exactly a huge issue, so I've not bothered saying anything.

 

We have two cars, one parked on the drive and one some way down the road as the parking is tricky where we are.

 

When we got back from a night away on Saturday, there was nowhere for the car to be parked, so we went next to this guys drive.

 

Another image for you...His drive is just about 2 cars width, and on the corner. It is level with the road the whole way round, but obviously they only park going in and out from the front otherwise they couldn't fit all their cars on. They do however park half on their drive, over the pavement area and onto the road with the other cars next to them. The entire area where our spaces are, including my neighbours on the other side is level to the road, even where the drives end. I suppose this was cheaper to do than bother with raising and lowering the kerb?

 

Back to the (very long) story. We parked to the left of his drive, parallel with all the cars, not blocking his entrance in and out. As we were walking from the car, the neighbour came out and just said 'You're not parking that there are you' (no question mark, this was a statement not a question!). OH said it's not blocking his (currently empty) drive as they only go in and out from the front, but swiftly getting more aggressive neighbour says that he's paid for the drive and we can't park there (remember he's a tenant and we know the kerb was like that before he moved in, so if it was dropped he has not paid for it).

 

It being late and us with the kids we didn't push the point and OH moved to bleedin' miles away.

 

The point of this lengthy question is to ask do they actually have the right to deny parking like that? Is there any way to find out if this is a proper right of access, or if it's just been laid out oddly and the access is as we think only a right from the front of the property?

 

It's very hard to describe without pictures, but hopefully someone can get the idea.

 

One thing I have found out on my searching for the answer is that it's not illegal to park over someone's drive if their is no wheeled vehicle there. It's highly dis-courteous, but you can do it. You can't block someone coming out though. So technically, I could be calling the police on them every time I am stuck having to weave my way through to get out, and they could do bugger all if I parked directly over their drive the other night as it was empty. I never would as I think it's such bad manners to block someone either way (and you'd probably end up being keyed), but apparently I could have!

 

Any thoughts anyone? It's just really wound me up due to 1) their frequent poor parking and 2) the way he asked - I wouldn't have given it a second thought if he'd just asked politely if we could move.

Edited by lexis200

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, lexis.

 

Do you want this thread moved to the 'parking' Forum, loads of knowledgeable people in there :)

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks wheelergeezer - I think it's below!

 

Google Maps

 

Ours is the drive with the black car (must be ages old - we've been here two years and that's not our car:)), neighbours with the van and the car own that bit of the drive, the bit that is empty is the one in question. Darker strip round the edge is the pavement, which is all dropped, and you can see goes beyond their house where there is a patch of bushes, and again opposite them where it's in front of a house.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said the kerb is dropped all over the place, including areas in front of houses and where there is grass verge and bushes. These are most definitely not access points but the kerb is still road level.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth talking to the tenants and trying to sort things out amicably. Put over your point of view but do so in a calm manner.

 

If this fails you could try going through their landlord. Do you know who the landlord is? It might be worth you while finding out and asking them to have a word to their tenants. The majority of landlords I've dealt with expect their tenants to be courteous in their dealings with their neighbours and would not want any upset to be caused.

 

I've had a similar experience with some idiots in the house next to mine. They had mates who would park over our drive - we asked them to sort it out but it kept happening. Spoke to the landlord and saw an immediate improvement.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks pin1onu

 

As it goes I'm really not too concerned about them parking as they do. We're hopefully moving in a few months and I really can't be bothered to get into a barny about it with them (he doesn't strike me as the amicable type:)).

 

All that irritated me was his attitude in telling us not to park there, when we were not obstructing his drive in any way. If you have a look at the map page, as you look from above, we were parked on the left hand side of the house, but on the road (about where you can see the blue wheelie bin lid). They enter and exit from the front all the time, otherwise they can't fit all their cars on. I think his issue was that if we parked there he couldn't park over the pavement with his, thus managing to fit all his cars on the drive that's not quite big enough for them!

 

They frequently park right to the end of the drive that you can see, just before the pavement bit starts. This is fine as long as I don't have a car next to me, but if that neighbour is in it gets pretty awkward to get out.

 

green_and_mean, this is what I am finding all over the place when I have searched for this

 

If your drive is legal, dropped kerb, then if someone parks across your drive while your car is on it, then they are guilty of the offence of Unnecessary Obstruction. In GMP land that is Offence Code 320 and is punishable by a Fixed Penalty Notice of £30. Unless they don't want to play ball, in which case

it comes down to the Magistrates. If the Cop (not Local Authority Parking Attendant) or Traffic PCSO, if you have them, can persuade the Duty Inspector, the vehcle can be removed at the owner's expense. Unfortunately,

since the demise of the Police Traffic Warden, the only people who can enforce this offence are the aforementioned PC or TPCSO. Normal PCSOs can't, at least not in our area. The reason the offence only applies if the vehicle is on the drive, is that the obstructing driver is preventing you going about your normal daily life, which could include going to the Hospital or work or the buy food. If you can't get on the drive then you could simply park elsewhere until the other vehicle has gone.

 

This argument is quoted over and over again in various forms - are you saying it is incorrect?

 

(I have to point out here I'm not asking so that I can go and do it - as I mentioned I just don't do that. We used to live near a nursery school where mums would regularly park over our drive when dropping off/picking up, so I'm very aware about blocking people now!)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/ukpga_20040018_en_9

 

 

86 Prohibition of parking at dropped footways etc.

(1) In a special enforcement area a vehicle must not be parked on the carriageway adjacent to a footway, cycle track or verge where—

(a) the footway, cycle track or verge has been lowered to meet the level of the carriageway for the purpose of—

(i) assisting pedestrians crossing the carriageway,

(ii) assisting cyclists entering or leaving the carriageway, or

(iii) assisting vehicles entering or leaving the carriageway across the footway, cycle track or verge; or

(b) the carriageway has, for a purpose within paragraph (a)(i) to (iii), been raised to meet the level of the footway, cycle track or verge.

This is subject to the following exceptions.

(2) The first exception is where the vehicle is parked wholly within a designated parking place or any other part of the carriageway where parking is specifically authorised.

A “designated parking place” means a parking place designated by order under section 6, 9, 32(1)(b) or 45 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (c. 27).

(3) The second exception is where the vehicle is parked outside residential premises by or with the consent (but not consent given for reward) of the occupier of the premises.

This exception does not apply in the case of a shared driveway.

(4) The third exception is where the vehicle is being used for fire brigade, ambulance or police purposes.

(5) The fourth exception is where—

(a) the vehicle is being used for the purposes of delivering goods to, or collecting goods from, any premises, or is being loaded from or unloaded to any premises,

(b) the delivery, collection, loading or unloading cannot reasonably be carried out in relation to those premises without the vehicle being parked as mentioned in subsection (1), and

© the vehicle is so parked for no longer than is necessary and for no more than 20 minutes.

(6) The fifth exception is where—

(a) the vehicle is being used in connection with any of the following—

(i) undertaking any building operation, demolition or excavation,

(ii) the collection of waste by a local authority,

(iii) removing an obstruction to traffic,

(iv) undertaking works in relation to a road, a traffic sign or road lighting, or

(v) undertaking works in relation to a sewer or water main or in relation to the supply of gas, electricity, water or communications services,

(b) it cannot be so used without being parked as mentioned in subsection (1), and

© it is so parked for no longer than is necessary.

(7) In this section “carriageway”, “cycle track” and “footway” have the meanings given by section 329(1) of the Highways Act 1980 (c. 66).

(8) References in this section to parking include waiting, but do not include stopping where—

(a) the driver is prevented from proceeding by circumstances beyond his control or it is necessary for him to stop to avoid an accident, or

(b) the vehicle is stopped, for no longer than is necessary, for the purpose of allowing people to board or alight from it.

(9) The prohibition in this section is enforceable as if imposed—

(a) in Greater London, by an order under section 6 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (c. 27),

(b) elsewhere in England and Wales, by an order under section 1 of that Act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem that bthe problem is not straight forward. There is a dropped kerb all the way from your house to the blue bin? Then you cannot park blocking any of that AFAIK. However, 4 cars????? I would certainly be talking with the house owner and checking with them. If you are reasonable with the landlord it should be straight forward.

 

I cannot see how they are parking and obstructing you. If you reverse onto your driveway will they then park obstructing the pavement in front of your house or theirs? If so that is obstruction. Someone in a wheelchair cannot be expected to use the road so that they can park on the pavement.

 

As they have made it akward for you to park at the weekend, then you need to make it quite clear to them that if the block your driveway you will contact their landlord, who is a good friend of yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem that bthe problem is not straight forward. There is a dropped kerb all the way from your house to the blue bin? Past it actually - it just continues right along the road for the most part - in front of bushes and the front of houses, hence my quandary as to whether the bit to the side of him is really a dropped kerb or if it's just lazy building when the estate was done!Then you cannot park blocking any of that AFAIK. However, 4 cars????? I would certainly be talking with the house owner and checking with them. If you are reasonable with the landlord it should be straight forward.

 

I cannot see how they are parking and obstructing you. If you reverse onto your driveway will they then park obstructing the pavement in front of your house or theirs? Yes, they sometimes park far enough back that if my other neighbour is in I either have to manoeuvre round or on a couple of occasions have just been blocked (not that I've needed to get out then, so it didn't worry me as I know parking is hard where we are). Trouble is our bit of drive intersects with the two neighbours if you look carefully - really it should have been a wider bit of pavement there I think. So we have to park to the end of it to allow the two cars we share the drive with to park, but this means if the ones on the other side park out at all they obstruct us. If they park out more than a little, then they block us if our other neighbours are in. If so that is obstruction. Someone in a wheelchair cannot be expected to use the road so that they can park on the pavement.

 

As they have made it akward for you to park at the weekend, then you need to make it quite clear to them that if the block your driveway you will contact their landlord, who is a good friend of yours.

 

Thanks for the advice:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...