Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ok again thanks for all advice , im going to continue and struggle on paying the wifes debts and maybe look at getting reduced payments but as for mine i think ill go down the DRO route and try get it sorted but will see and open new bank account somewhere first
    • Nothing to do with your own Bank.     Try to withdraw the money from Parentpay early next week and if no joy contact them.   It may be that the money is showing, but has not fully cleared on their system,
    • Hi all,   Just an update with contractual terms. These terms are from a contract at a similar time to when Tracey started as we think they have changed since.   The contract reads as follows:   Termination of employment  Xxxxxxx (Nursery) will provide written notice of termination of your employment in accordance with statutory requirement (currently 1 week’s notice for each year of continuous service, up to a maximum 12 week’s notice).   Once you have successfully completed your probationary period for the company you are required to give 1 month’s written notice of termination of employment.   Regards   Matt             
    • Thanks for helping with the post;   Still waiting for a reply from the DPD.
    • I thank the Consumer Action Group Members for getting me this far in my case which is still in progress.   Situation: The Court has reversed earlier permission for me to rely on witness summaries.    The question upon which I am seeking help, please,  is - do I need to bother myself as to why the Court has reversed permission to rely on witness summaries?  If so, what line of logic or law can might I follow because clearly, the Court has said one thing and then another a few weeks later, of its own motion, the Court has reversed the earlier decision. I find this development quite extraordinary in the sense that as a result of being granted permission earlier, I served the three Witness Summons which had the Court stamp.   Background Having given me permission to serve 'Witness Summons' which I served on 3 hostile witnesses several weeks ago, the Court has now reversed it's earlier decision, and refused me permission to rely on 'witness summaries' pursuant to paragraph 32.9(2), citing that I have not shown steps taken to obtain witness statements from the 3 hostile witnesses.  I however, made two attempts to talk to the hostile witnesses who have been non responsive and I can evidence this.   I would be immensely grateful for some steer from Forum Members, please.
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 6 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
seasmells

Capquest - Defaults on Credit file

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4017 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

This lot have been pursuing me for a while now (at my in law's address - embarrassing!) , after a debt that was nearly 6 years old. I wish I had found this site before getting scared by their bullying tactics and started paying them last year!!!

 

It was 2 accounts - one a Nat West account in my name for £300, which I stupidly paid off straight away, the other was a joint account (overdraft) at the Nat West with my husband.

 

The thing was, they just had my name on this debt, not my husbands!!!

 

I sent them complaint letters about their bullying tactics and the incorrect name on the account. I got the usual apology letter - they had checked with Nat West and updated their details to have both our names on it.

 

We started paying this by £25 a month then couldn't afford it and stopped paying it last year. We heard nothing for 12 months, then out of the blue, I got 2 letters addressed to just me, one from Capquest (offering to pay some money themselves towards the debt for what I pay!!) and another from HL legal saying litigation advice!!! My husband has had no letters so presumably they haven't updated their records!!! I rang and they had no record of it!!!

 

Anyway, to cut a lost story short, and this is the main thing that is annoying me - I checked my credit file and Capquest are registering defaults on my credit file!! The same debt that Nat West are putting on my credit file!! (My husband is too chicken to check his to see if they are doing the same on his)

 

What I need to know is, next year I will have a clear credit file and now that Capquest have done this, does this mean it will not be clean next year, but 6 years from now - even though the original debt will be 6 years old early next year and wiped off my credit file?!!

 

Can they do this? Please help!!

 

Thanks

 

S:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

on your credit file

 

what date is the default registered under (started)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Nat West account was closed in April 2004.

On Equifax it says Company type: Debt collector but no date of default but has a "D" under April 2004.

 

On Callcredit it says Natwest, date of default April 2004 but "D" symbols until June 2006 then locked symbols until present. The another file underneath this on says Capquest (Formerly FTC) default date April 2004 but has "D" symbols for just May & June this year. But I have had no notice of default from Capquest and no letters since last summer!!! And why should this be two separate files on my credit file? Surely it should just be one?!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there should only be one default for one account

when the dca got the debt, the bank default should have come off and re-registered in the name of the dca

 

the default is april 2004 and will be deleated april 2010

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for that. I will be composing them an extremely polite note to that effect this evening (haha!)

 

I used to be frightened of them as they were really nasty on the phone to me - one woman even accused me of hanging up on them! I told her it was my telephone and it was my prerogative (spelling?!) to speak or not speak to whom ever I wanted to on it. I also said that if they wanted more people to answer their phones, they should employ personnel to ring people up and not computers who treat you to a minutes silence!:lol:

 

Have courage people and force DCAs to treat you with the respect you deserve as a human being regardless if you owe them money or not!

 

Anyway, sermon over, I'm off to write that letter. Thanks for the help.

 

S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...