Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DCA Charges for making payments.....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, this is something I have been wondering about for a while, and I have seen a few people in other posts having the same kind of issues.

 

But where does the law stand on the issue of DCAs adding a charge for you making a paymen?

 

For example, I recently had dealings with a DCA that charged 50p to pay by Postal Order, 50p to pay by Credit or Debit Card, 50p to pay in the Post Office, 50p to pay by Cheque, 50p to pay by Direct Debit and 50p to pay by Standing Order...... so in other words whatever way you pay them they charge you 50p for the privilege!!!

 

Can this be legal? I know for damn sure it's not moral, but I am unsure of where these leeches stand in the eyes of the law??

 

I dont have to deal with the above company any more but I just thought that this could be quite an interesting and helpful thread for the people of the forum :)

 

Cheers

UF

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think 2.10d would cover them making what is effectively a 'handling charge.

 

THE DEBT COLLECTION GUIDANCE

 

Charging for debt collection

2.9 Charges should not be levied unfairly.

 

2.10 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a.claiming collection costs from a debtor in the absence of express

contractual or other legal provision

 

b.misleading debtors into believing they are legally liable to pay

collection charges when this is not the case, for example, when there

is no contractual provision

 

c. not giving an indication in credit agreements of the amount of any

charges payable on default

 

d.applying unreasonable charges, for example, charges not based on actual

and necessary costs

 

e.applying charges which are disproportionate to the main debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wescot used to send payment slips so i could pay at the Post Office as i refused to pay by direct debit. Each time i would make a payment at the Post Office i was charged £2.20 each time!!I kept writing to them asking for a way to pay that didn't result in me having to pay charges but they just ignored me. In the end i set up a Standing Order. Then i sent them a CCA request but they do not have it so i don't have to pay them anymore!!

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

mmmmmm as i understand it you have never entered into a contract with a DCA therefore there can not exists any terms and conditions stating what they can charge you for handling payments .

 

they are therefore just making them up

 

well what's good for the goose is good for the gander

 

so why don't you charge them 5 pounds for every payment you make as your costs of administration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is a Post Office charge, rather than a DCA charge. It's just another way for them to screw you over though - they will be fully aware of the PO's charges, which is why they probably refuse to give you alternative methods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For example, I recently had dealings with a DCA that charged 50p to pay by Postal Order, 50p to pay by Credit or Debit Card, 50p to pay in the Post Office, 50p to pay by Cheque, 50p to pay by Direct Debit and 50p to pay by Standing Order...... so in other words whatever way you pay them they charge you 50p for the privilege!!!

 

I think the clue is in the highlighted words.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For example, I recently had dealings with a DCA that charged 50p to pay by Postal Order, 50p to pay by Credit or Debit Card, 50p to pay in the Post Office, 50p to pay by Cheque, 50p to pay by Direct Debit and 50p to pay by Standing Order...... so in other words whatever way you pay them they charge you 50p for the privilege!!!

 

A change of collector from OC to DCA cannot result in a consumer being put in a worse position than they already were. IE if OC made these charges as common practice it is legimate, if not DCA cannot impose them.

 

There may well be a contractual provision for DCA to make 50p charges on every possible payment method, however that contract is between OC and DCA, not you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always deduct 50p from the sum you are paying to cover their charges, which I would say are illegal anyway

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...