Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A judge says Anthony Levandowski carried out the "biggest trade secret crime I have ever seen". View the full article
    • Yes, let us know if they honour the agreement to pay.   Thanks for Donation made and anything further you can make - it helps us keep helping !
    • Mark Bauwens from France takes us through his week during the coronavirus pandemic. View the full article
    • Thankyou very much i will be around all day it would be appreciated Below is another attempt :     IN THE COUNTY COURT AT ***************                 CLAIM NO:**********     BETWEEN:   LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD CLAIMANT   and   MRS *********************** DEFENDANT   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   WITNESS STATEMENT OF ******************   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   I, ******************************************* WILL SAY as follows:   I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim.     INTRODUCTION   1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed 10p to 15p in the £1 and to which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Lowell Portfolio I Ltd issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.   2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   BACKGROUND 3. The Claim relates to an alleged Credit Card Agreement between the defendant and Vanquis Bank   4. Whilst it is accepted that the defendant has in the past had financial dealings with Vanquis, the defendant is unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers, and the defendant has not entered into any contract with the Claimant.   5.The defendant made a formal written request to the Claimant for them to provide me with a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement as entitled to do so under sections 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on the 27th August 2019 along with the standard fee of £1.00 postal order to which the defendant received a reply dated 6th September 2019 putting their account on hold whilst they tried to gather the information.   6.The defendant received a reply dated 24th October 2019 with no CCA attached other than the documents which enclosed a statement, default notice, notice of assignment from Vanquis to Lowell & a reconstituted copy of an agreement which the claimants have already provided in their witness statement dated 3rd August 2020.   7.On 15th January 2020, I received a claim form from the County Court Business Centre, Northampton, for the amount of £******. The claimant contends that the claim is for the sum of £********* in respect of monies owing under an alleged agreement with the account no ******************* pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA). Contained within the claimants particulars the claimant states that the account was subject to assignment from Vanquis to Lowell on 24 June 2015 with notice given.   CONCLUSION 8.To date no valid full true copy of the executed credit agreement or the terms and conditions have been disclosed .the claimant has no grounds on which to enforce this alleged debt.   9.The claimant disclosed various screenshots taken from the originators software of the application and also confirms on their covering letter the relative legislation The Electronic Communications Act 2000 with regards to wet signatures and the requirement of a tick box to validate the application. The screenshots are devoid of any tick box or any authenticity of IP address conformation check.   10.Therefore the claimant remains in default of my section 78 request and pursuant to section 78 6a of the CCA1974 the claimant is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.   11.For the above reasons the claim bought by the claimant is without merit and an abuse of the court process. It would be far more gracious and forthright for the claimant to admit that they do not have possession of the correct valid paperwork and this is an attempt to mislead and convince the court that the claimant can disclose the legal valid documents on which its claim relies on. It is therefore requested that the Claimants Claim is struck out pursuant to the above.   STATEMENT OF TRUTH   I, ************** the defendant, believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of Court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   Signed: …………………………………………… Print Name: ************* Dated: 4th August 2020
    • Allen Blue, who co-founded professional network LinkedIn, reveals how start-ups can achieve growth. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
        • Thanks
      • 8 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
        • Like
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
        • Thanks
      • 16 replies
echowitch

Dispute against Penalty Charges & Witholding Payments

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4003 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Yesterday I rang Welcome Car Finance's local branch and told them I was placing the account in Dispute and was with-holding payments until I had received a full Statement of Account showing the original amount, all payments made, and charges (i.e. Penalty Charges which Im disputing) and any PPI and Interest. I've told them it is my belief that the account has actually been paid off and all I am paying now is the Penalty Charges (telephone, letter, failed card payments, etc) which are illegal charges.

 

Just had a phonecall from the usual member of Welcome staff who told me I that I still have to make payments as a Solicitor would advise me. She kept banging on about this until I told her I had two friends who were Solicitors which shut her up. (Also me asking her three times "are you going to let me finish talking?" eventually worked.)

 

I've sent a letter to their Customer Relationship Centre in Hessle (last letter I sent there never got a response and I doubt this formal notification of dispute will either.)

 

Just wanting to know if I should remain withholding payments until the dispute is settled or not ?? I've told them I expect the Statement of Account to be sent to me within a week and once I've received it I will review it and action it within 48 hours, which gives me time to go over it and seek any further advice I need.

 

Of course that is IF they send me the Statement of Account. The last time I asked for it I had to ask four times before they finally sent it !!!

 

Oh and I nearly laughed when they told me that they were allowed to add charges as its in their Terms and Conditions lol


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Additional Note:

 

I renegotiated the agreement to make lower payments as I found I was having problems keeping up to date with them. This was several years ago. Last Statement of Account I got showed that they slapped even more interest on for the new agreement. It was "sold" to me on the basis that they were reorganising the remaining debt over a longer period for a lower amount to make it easier for me. What they basically did (I found out later) was made the renegotiated amount in to a new loan with all the interest slapped on top. Not what I wanted or was led to believe !!!

 

Anyway I can challenge that ??


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know how much potentially they owe you in penalty charges and possibly PPI ?


PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what is stated is my own opinion and from what I have learnt from this forum and my own experiences.

 

DEBT COLLECTION LETTER/SAR/AGREEMENT TEMPLATES ARE HERE - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?65-legislation

 

IF WE HAVE BEEN HELPFUL -PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GIVE A DONATION TO HELP US TO CONTINUE HELPING YOU

 

I AM HAPPY TO RECEIVE PM's AND I WILL RESPOND IF I FEEL I CAN ASSIST BUT WHEN YOU DO CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO COMMENT - THANK YOU

 

IMPORTANT - If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.

Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are/or could be seen to be inappropriate for posting on the main forum.Site rules explain this in more detail.

If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website,please inform the site team via the report icon.

 

Forum rules - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The last Statement of Account I got from them claimed that I still owed about £2500 although at the time I said that I was sure that I only had a couple (like 3) more payments to make. That was end of last year. I keep having them ring me needlessly, and then sending me letters telling me they have charged me for the phonecalls and charged me for the letter telling me about the charges for the phonecall.


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crikey that was quick. The Statement of Account arrived today. Im going to go through it and see what we have and post up later on.


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick figures (Im still trying to find the documentation for the previous loan to work out how much interest was added on.)

 

30/12/2003 Modified Disbursement £11365.80

30/06/2009 Current Balance £2288.73

 

And the fee's added on that the Statement shows as totals

Fee Assessment's (no idea what this is) £2.81

Telephone Call Fee's £200

Letter Fee's £100

Capitalisation £405 (anyone care to clear up for me what this is ?)

Debit Card Declined Fee's £55 (their equipment keeps rejecting perfectly good cards the first couple of times)

Ad Hoc Fee's £140 (no explanation as to what these are)

Outside Call Fee's £50 (charged at £25 a time and no explanation)


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

capitalisation is interest.

 

I would be interested to know what the ad hoc fees are about, I have seen that loads and have yet to find out the reason of them.

 

the definition of ad hoc:A phrase describing something created especially for a particular occasion

 

so what is the occassion? I think these need to be looked into further, surely a charge without proper definition is not legal????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

was checking out the OFT website and maybe this isn't relevant but I think to the ad hoc fees it might be especially when there is no resonable explaination for what the fee is:

d. applying unreasonable charges, for example, charges not based on actual

and necessary costs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked Welcome staff before what the Ad Hoc fee's were and none of them knew. Not local branch staff, nor Collections Department staff.


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then surely they can't charge them...??? its just a case of we'll add a fee for no reason and the suckers will pay it!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep pretty much. But isn't that what all these Penalty Charges anyway. Yet more ways for big corporations to screw the little guy knowing full well he or she won't know any better, and even if they do then they'll just scare them.


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did some checking.....as they add interest on at the start of the loan to cover their costs, then Capitalisation is clearly interest on top of the Penalty Charges. In fact it event shows up on the Statement of Account after each Penalty Charge entry, thus making it also illegal, right ???

 

So deducting the penalty charges from the current balance.....

 

£2288.73 - £952.81 = £1335.92 remaining (I'll only have 7 more payments to make)

 

I am wondering though if I should look in to whether they mis-sold the loan to me. As the original loan (which I thought this was the original loan until I checked my credit file last year and discovered it was a second loan) was reorganised to lower the payments and pay it over a longer period as I couldn't make the original payments. I didn't realise that it was a brand new loan with more interest added on top, and certainly no one at Welcome told me anything about it being a new loan or interest being added on top. Anything I can do about that ???


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

echowitch, they seem to be in the habit of informing people of something and not being totally honest about it or the further ramifications involved.

 

maybe its just my logic but if a loan is re-written why wouldn't it keep the same account number when in effect all you are doing is changing the payment terms...or maybe there is some weird logic that i can't fathom on that...or its a legal thing.

 

I still think the ad hoc fee's need further investigation as to how ligitimate they really are...a fee without purpose that seems unreasonably high for its designated "lack" of purpose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked them a few days ago to send me copies of both agreements so I can look at them. This being my new account manager who has said she'll even waive the £1 charge (hah they tried to tell me its £10 yeah right). Incidentally my previous account manager who I last spoke to (i.e. had a blazing argument with on the phone) last week apparently is no longer there. No idea if she's been given the sack or as seems to be the case with incompetent staff at Welcome, promoted.

 

If she has been sacked because of her argument with me on the phone that would be the third person I've managed to get fired. (Two were from DCA's that I lodged formal complaints against the members of staff who were incredibly rude and offensive......I used to train Customer Service Agents so I have high standards for CS staff.)


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i would love to know what you said/did to get them sacked and how you proved their offensive behaviour ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easy, they were DCA's and I made a reasonable offer of payment and they tried to make me pay way more than I could afford. They got argumentative, demanding, and offensive (telling me I was lying, and they'd "get me" and similar comments.) I had their names anyway but as all the calls were recorded all I had to do was ring back, demand to speak to a Supervisor/Manager and lodge the complaint. In fact in both cases when speaking to the rude member of staff that would later be sacked I demanded that they pass me to their supervisor and they refused. One of them flatly refused for nearly 5 minutes and then hung up calling me a very rude word. Simple case of Gross Misconduct and they are out the door within the hour :)


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I asked Welcome staff before what the Ad Hoc fee's were and none of them knew. Not local branch staff, nor Collections Department staff.

 

Has anyone actually asked the question of who applies the ad-hoc fees to the account, because surely they aren't just system generated will-nilly...or are they?...from going through my statements i think the odd £5.00 ad-hoc fee is added when a card payment is made, so surely the staff member has generated it...

i used to work for a tour operator and before the systems were upgraded we used to have to manually apply the credit card charge manually etc..

 

b-o-2


ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still no copies of my CCA's arrived yet. The monthly paydate came and I rang the branch and told them I was withholding payment as I still consider the account to be in dispute as they have failed to provide me with the CCA as per their requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The local branch told me they sent me copies......yeah right !!


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats odd i thought it would be compliance who sent the CCA!! maybe again thats me being too logical...however it makes more sense that the local branch who hold the original copies would have to send it off!

 

brain not working today

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the original branch was Aldershot but for us now its Reading. From what I've been told though all the documents are held with Head Office AKA Muppet Central.


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a reply from Compliance today who sent me the below lovely letter lol Funny that the branch claim to have sent it out already and have re-requested it for free and yet Compliance demand money.

 

20082009122849sbggjnfgfk.jpg


__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...