Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dispute against Penalty Charges & Witholding Payments


echowitch
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5356 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yesterday I rang Welcome Car Finance's local branch and told them I was placing the account in Dispute and was with-holding payments until I had received a full Statement of Account showing the original amount, all payments made, and charges (i.e. Penalty Charges which Im disputing) and any PPI and Interest. I've told them it is my belief that the account has actually been paid off and all I am paying now is the Penalty Charges (telephone, letter, failed card payments, etc) which are illegal charges.

 

Just had a phonecall from the usual member of Welcome staff who told me I that I still have to make payments as a Solicitor would advise me. She kept banging on about this until I told her I had two friends who were Solicitors which shut her up. (Also me asking her three times "are you going to let me finish talking?" eventually worked.)

 

I've sent a letter to their Customer Relationship Centre in Hessle (last letter I sent there never got a response and I doubt this formal notification of dispute will either.)

 

Just wanting to know if I should remain withholding payments until the dispute is settled or not ?? I've told them I expect the Statement of Account to be sent to me within a week and once I've received it I will review it and action it within 48 hours, which gives me time to go over it and seek any further advice I need.

 

Of course that is IF they send me the Statement of Account. The last time I asked for it I had to ask four times before they finally sent it !!!

 

Oh and I nearly laughed when they told me that they were allowed to add charges as its in their Terms and Conditions lol

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Additional Note:

 

I renegotiated the agreement to make lower payments as I found I was having problems keeping up to date with them. This was several years ago. Last Statement of Account I got showed that they slapped even more interest on for the new agreement. It was "sold" to me on the basis that they were reorganising the remaining debt over a longer period for a lower amount to make it easier for me. What they basically did (I found out later) was made the renegotiated amount in to a new loan with all the interest slapped on top. Not what I wanted or was led to believe !!!

 

Anyway I can challenge that ??

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last Statement of Account I got from them claimed that I still owed about £2500 although at the time I said that I was sure that I only had a couple (like 3) more payments to make. That was end of last year. I keep having them ring me needlessly, and then sending me letters telling me they have charged me for the phonecalls and charged me for the letter telling me about the charges for the phonecall.

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crikey that was quick. The Statement of Account arrived today. Im going to go through it and see what we have and post up later on.

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick figures (Im still trying to find the documentation for the previous loan to work out how much interest was added on.)

 

30/12/2003 Modified Disbursement £11365.80

30/06/2009 Current Balance £2288.73

 

And the fee's added on that the Statement shows as totals

Fee Assessment's (no idea what this is) £2.81

Telephone Call Fee's £200

Letter Fee's £100

Capitalisation £405 (anyone care to clear up for me what this is ?)

Debit Card Declined Fee's £55 (their equipment keeps rejecting perfectly good cards the first couple of times)

Ad Hoc Fee's £140 (no explanation as to what these are)

Outside Call Fee's £50 (charged at £25 a time and no explanation)

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

capitalisation is interest.

 

I would be interested to know what the ad hoc fees are about, I have seen that loads and have yet to find out the reason of them.

 

the definition of ad hoc:A phrase describing something created especially for a particular occasion

 

so what is the occassion? I think these need to be looked into further, surely a charge without proper definition is not legal????

Link to post
Share on other sites

was checking out the OFT website and maybe this isn't relevant but I think to the ad hoc fees it might be especially when there is no resonable explaination for what the fee is:

d. applying unreasonable charges, for example, charges not based on actual

and necessary costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked Welcome staff before what the Ad Hoc fee's were and none of them knew. Not local branch staff, nor Collections Department staff.

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep pretty much. But isn't that what all these Penalty Charges anyway. Yet more ways for big corporations to screw the little guy knowing full well he or she won't know any better, and even if they do then they'll just scare them.

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I did some checking.....as they add interest on at the start of the loan to cover their costs, then Capitalisation is clearly interest on top of the Penalty Charges. In fact it event shows up on the Statement of Account after each Penalty Charge entry, thus making it also illegal, right ???

 

So deducting the penalty charges from the current balance.....

 

£2288.73 - £952.81 = £1335.92 remaining (I'll only have 7 more payments to make)

 

I am wondering though if I should look in to whether they mis-sold the loan to me. As the original loan (which I thought this was the original loan until I checked my credit file last year and discovered it was a second loan) was reorganised to lower the payments and pay it over a longer period as I couldn't make the original payments. I didn't realise that it was a brand new loan with more interest added on top, and certainly no one at Welcome told me anything about it being a new loan or interest being added on top. Anything I can do about that ???

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

echowitch, they seem to be in the habit of informing people of something and not being totally honest about it or the further ramifications involved.

 

maybe its just my logic but if a loan is re-written why wouldn't it keep the same account number when in effect all you are doing is changing the payment terms...or maybe there is some weird logic that i can't fathom on that...or its a legal thing.

 

I still think the ad hoc fee's need further investigation as to how ligitimate they really are...a fee without purpose that seems unreasonably high for its designated "lack" of purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked them a few days ago to send me copies of both agreements so I can look at them. This being my new account manager who has said she'll even waive the £1 charge (hah they tried to tell me its £10 yeah right). Incidentally my previous account manager who I last spoke to (i.e. had a blazing argument with on the phone) last week apparently is no longer there. No idea if she's been given the sack or as seems to be the case with incompetent staff at Welcome, promoted.

 

If she has been sacked because of her argument with me on the phone that would be the third person I've managed to get fired. (Two were from DCA's that I lodged formal complaints against the members of staff who were incredibly rude and offensive......I used to train Customer Service Agents so I have high standards for CS staff.)

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Easy, they were DCA's and I made a reasonable offer of payment and they tried to make me pay way more than I could afford. They got argumentative, demanding, and offensive (telling me I was lying, and they'd "get me" and similar comments.) I had their names anyway but as all the calls were recorded all I had to do was ring back, demand to speak to a Supervisor/Manager and lodge the complaint. In fact in both cases when speaking to the rude member of staff that would later be sacked I demanded that they pass me to their supervisor and they refused. One of them flatly refused for nearly 5 minutes and then hung up calling me a very rude word. Simple case of Gross Misconduct and they are out the door within the hour :)

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked Welcome staff before what the Ad Hoc fee's were and none of them knew. Not local branch staff, nor Collections Department staff.

 

Has anyone actually asked the question of who applies the ad-hoc fees to the account, because surely they aren't just system generated will-nilly...or are they?...from going through my statements i think the odd £5.00 ad-hoc fee is added when a card payment is made, so surely the staff member has generated it...

i used to work for a tour operator and before the systems were upgraded we used to have to manually apply the credit card charge manually etc..

 

b-o-2

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Still no copies of my CCA's arrived yet. The monthly paydate came and I rang the branch and told them I was withholding payment as I still consider the account to be in dispute as they have failed to provide me with the CCA as per their requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

The local branch told me they sent me copies......yeah right !!

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats odd i thought it would be compliance who sent the CCA!! maybe again thats me being too logical...however it makes more sense that the local branch who hold the original copies would have to send it off!

 

brain not working today

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the original branch was Aldershot but for us now its Reading. From what I've been told though all the documents are held with Head Office AKA Muppet Central.

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I got a reply from Compliance today who sent me the below lovely letter lol Funny that the branch claim to have sent it out already and have re-requested it for free and yet Compliance demand money.

 

20082009122849sbggjnfgfk.jpg

__________________

Capital One - Took them to court and they settled for the full £998

Aqua - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £424

Barclaycard - Threatened legal action, they refunded the whole £636

RBS/Universa - 1st letter sent, settled for £132

Virgin Media - 1st Judge great....second Judge couldn't even be bothered to read the case details

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...