Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • EU deal replicated 'as far as possible' ... aka less than   "The British Government is continuing to work intensively on securing continuity with other countries. We have secured agreements – either signed or agreed in principle - that account for 64% of the UK’s trade with all the countries with which the UK is seeking continuity, should we leave the EU without a deal."   With what I've seen on that page I linked earlier, that would seem to be decidedly unambitious 'trade deals across the world larger than the EU
    • dx100uk - thank you for your advice.  I will send a SAR to Vanquis and really appreciate all the help on here.   I may have read your last sentence in the way that it was not intended but it has came across very judgmental and not helpful.  I have came on this site for some help, not to be judged.  If that was not your intention then I apologise as I realise text can be read in the way it was not intended.  
    • . I'm sorry but this is not correct. There is a very long established rule that you are required to exercise utmost good faith (uberrima fides) when becoming a party to any kind of insurance contract. This means that you have quite a strict duty to accept responsibility for disclosing any information which a reasonable person in your position might understand could materially affect the risk. I can imagine that the interpretation of this rule would not be applied quite so strictly to a very new and young driver – but the more that one has been driving and the more insurance policies one has held, then I think that the stricter  this rule becomes. It is also well established that one can misrepresent something simply by withholding information – by silence. I'm sorry to say that I think that this rule and the value of it is so self-evident that it is scarcely worth discussing. I wouldn't start raising this issue if I were you with insurers or the courts because you will come away with a bloody nose and loss of credibility
    • @unclebulgaria67 your point is particularly valid especially in regards to loss in the event of a claim. Irrespective of 2x SP30’s or not the vehicle is insured for its full market value. The insurers rating changes based on risk against those endorsements, where said risk calculation isn’t made available.    Also I question the validation of 22% in premium. Is that based on today’s risk profiling, or is that applied retrospectively to day 1 and can that be evidenced.    One thing that is very clear, is that to bring about any degree of misrepresentation the insurer has to have evidence that questions were asked in regards to the endorsements.   This was an auto renewal and when I’ve checked the Brokers electronic Copy on “My Policy’ at renewal, there is no section included relative to accidents in the last 5 yrs or Motoring convictions. Everything else relative to me and the named driver is listed. 
    • Here is what exposes Johnson & Co Commission document, makes for sober reading   Wonder if Snake Oil Singham has read and digested it?   https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/brexit_files/info_site/com_2020_324_2_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en_0.pdf
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
sutton6344

Insurance saying no cover, day before final inspection

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3743 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

The title says it all really.

 

I had severe flood damage to my house and on the instructions of the insurance threw out all permanent fixtures including kitchen and flooring so that the house could be dried out.

 

Reinstatement work has been completed in accordance with the Surveyors Guidelines and within 24 hours of the final inspection to assess the completed work I was told that no cover was in place.

 

This obviously leaves several unhappy builders screaming at me.

 

Can this be done at the last minute in this way?

Edited by sutton6344
change

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the first thing you need to do is find out exactly why they are saying you have no cover. It could be due to any number of things, for example the policy expiring just before the flood occurred, that your policy didn't cover you for flood damage (which would be unusual), that the broker didn't pass on the premium to the insurer, payments being missed etc or it could be a systems fault at their end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who authorised the repairs, did the Insurer concerned authorise the builders directly or did they authorise you to instruct the builders to start the repair work. Or did you instruct them off your own bat?

 

Mossy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The loss adjusters authorised me to instruct the builders on condition it was within the guidelines of the surveyors report.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK this sounds odd, normally cover is checked BEFORE appointing loss adjusters to deal, do you have this authorisation in a written format?

 

Mossy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK this sounds odd, normally cover is checked BEFORE appointing loss adjusters to deal, do you have this authorisation in a written format?

 

 

Yes........by email

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please find out why they have repudiated the claim?

Without this, we are unable to determine why they withdraw their decision to cover the claim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can you please find out why they have repudiated the claim?

Without this, we are unable to determine why they withdraw their decision to cover the claim.

 

They say there was a problem with the direct debit payment in May 2008 and the policy was cancelled accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They say there was a problem with the direct debit payment in May 2008 and the policy was cancelled accordingly.

 

Pay the premium for that renewal and all should be sorted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pay the premium for that renewal and all should be sorted

 

It was the monthly premium not the renewal and I've already offered to pay any shortfall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the date of loss (Flood)?

 

Did the Insurers or Third Party Finance Company send you a letter advising that the month's premium was unpaid? If so, what action did you take and what was the date of this letter relative to the date of the flood?

 

H

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When was the date of loss (Flood)?

 

Did the Insurers or Third Party Finance Company send you a letter advising that the month's premium was unpaid? If so, what action did you take and what was the date of this letter relative to the date of the flood?

 

H

 

 

The flood was in January 2009

 

They sent me a letter in July 2009 advising the premium was unpaid and policy cancelled, this was the day before the final inspection.

 

I immediataly offered to pay any shortfall that can be confirmed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please clarify:-

 

You say 'They say there was a problem with the direct debit payment in May 2008 and the policy was cancelled accordingly.' and then 'They sent me a letter in July 2009 advising the premium was unpaid and policy cancelled, this was the day before the final inspection.'

 

So is it correct that NO premiums were paid May 2008 onwards and you did not notice? The flood occurred 8 months later and you notified the Insurers who having checked your records appointed Loss Adjusters who dealt and some six months later have decided cover is not operative as cover was cancelled over a years past. Something is definitely not right????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So is it correct that NO premiums were paid May 2008 onwards and you did not notice? The flood occurred 8 months later and you notified the Insurers who having checked your records appointed Loss Adjusters who dealt and some six months later have decided cover is not operative as cover was cancelled over a years past. Something is definitely not right????

 

 

 

 

That's what happened in a nutshell!!! Although contents insurance did continue to be deducted on the same day!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.. Basically despite over 50 emails discussing the progress of the work and £7k already paid out for drying costs, the insurance cancelled the final inspection due to a payment error 12 months previoiusly (they didn't try to collect failed payment when previously they had). In one of their emails they even asked me to clarify the address to post the cheque.

 

Since this, I have sent another 50 emails and have hit a brick wall.

 

Now that floods are in the news and considering Axa's new TV advert regarding flood victims, is it now worth contacting the press about this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Request a copy of all correspondence that has been issued to you since May 2008. If it's not in order, make a formal complaint to the policy underwriting manager. They will send out information for you to contact the Financial Ombudsman so if what they tell you isn't fair, escalate your complaint.

 

This advice is based on you're being certain that you were not told that the policy was cancelled before the date of the loss.

Edited by MicheleFloyd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Request a copy of all correspondence that has been issued to you since May 2008. If it's not in order, make a formal complaint to the policy underwriting manager. They will send out information for you to contact the Financial Ombudsman so if what they tell you isn't fair, escalate your complaint.

 

This advice is based on you're being certain that you were not told that the policy was cancelled before the date of the loss.

 

The Insurers will argue that the policyholder was aware that payments were not been taken from their bank since May 2008, which is a reasonable arguement and will stand up in Court.

 

The OP cannot reasonably argue that they were unaware that payments were not been taken for such a long period of time.

 

Mossy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now that floods are in the news and considering Axa's new TV advert regarding flood victims, is it now worth contacting the press about this.

 

I'm not so sure how that would work in your favour, basically you haven't paid any installments on your policy since May 2008, 8 months before the loss occurred.

 

If the policy was cancelled because of non payment then it was cancelled and you had no cover when the damage occurred

 

Mossy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know they can backdate the cancellation to the date of nonpayment but I was under the impression there was a duty for insurers to notify the policyholder of cancellation as per the FSA guidelines. A quick re-print of the insured's documentation history will probably reveal he was issued a cancellation notice last year. If it was lost in the post, I would say that he was out of luck. If they never issued it, he's got a fighting chance. He could argue that he did not know that the payments were not taken out and because the insurer paid the claim, he was given the impression that he was on cover. He could argue that his decisions on how to handle his loss would have been affected had the insurer properly checked his cover before giving the go ahead for repairs. He might have done the work as DIY, sold the house or who knows what.

 

Just my opinion, mind you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I He could argue that he did not know that the payments were not taken out and because the insurer paid the claim, he was given the impression that he was on cover.

 

Just my opinion, mind you.

 

I'm not sure I follow your argument there, the OP hasn't paid any monthly installments since May08, if it goes to Court the insurers will argue it is reasonable to assume that a person would notice that no payments had been taken from their account under a direct debit for the last 8 months, and I don't see that the insurer hasn't paid any claim since cancellation.

 

The insurers acted to expediate matters and proceeded as they should and then discovered the OP had a cancelled policy.

 

Mossy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I follow your argument there, the OP hasn't paid any monthly installments since May08, if it goes to Court the insurers will argue it is reasonable to assume that a person would notice that no payments had been taken from their account under a direct debit for the last 8 months, and I don't see that the insurer hasn't paid any claim since cancellation.

 

 

Well the insurance didn't notice for the 4 or 5 months whilst they were instructing me to carry out the work to their specification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well the insurance didn't notice for the 4 or 5 months whilst they were instructing me to carry out the work to their specification.

 

That's your only argument (and I personally think (and hope) you will succeed with it)), that you acted as you did because you were instructed by your insurers, and had they not told you to do something or advised you earlier that there was a problem with your policy then you wouldn't have incurred the expenses you did.

 

I'm also hoping that they instructed the builders etc and NOT you, if so then they have a bigger problem than simply saying the policy was cancelled

 

Good luck

 

Mossy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The OP cannot reasonably argue that they were unaware that payments were not been taken for such a long period of time.

 

I'm not sure I would have noticed if, as the OP said, the same insurers continued to DD payments at the same point in the month for contents cover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP cannot reasonably argue that they were unaware that payments were not been taken for such a long period of time.

 

using the same logic, the insurance cannot reasonably argue they were unaware of the same for the period of time they were instructing work to their specification.

 

I'm not sure I would have noticed if, as the OP said, the same insurers continued to DD payments at the same point in the month for contents cover.

 

Is it standard practice for buildings and contents policies to be recommended seperately when taken out at the same time ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not sure I follow your argument there, the OP hasn't paid any monthly installments since May08, if it goes to Court the insurers will argue it is reasonable to assume that a person would notice that no payments had been taken from their account under a direct debit for the last 8 months, and I don't see that the insurer hasn't paid any claim since cancellation.

 

The insurers acted to expediate matters and proceeded as they should and then discovered the OP had a cancelled policy.

 

Mossy

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that the insurer is incorrect in denying cover due to nonpayment, but they might well have to eat the costs of his claim due to their not following proper procedures (assuming they did.)

 

I have known someone who didn't notice a DD had gone out for quite a few months, which is negligent and hands a good portion of the blame to the policyholder. But the insurer's mistakes in this case might cause them to reconsider their position and make him a "go away" offer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...