Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2 months notice received.. advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5402 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

If someone could answer my question i'd really appreciate it..

 

My landlord has issued me with a notice requiring possession of my home, it is a 2month notice.

I am looking for somewhere to move but do i still have to 1months notice?

 

In my tenancy agreement it states landlord has to give 2 months written notice and tenant 1 month notice but as the landlord has given me my notice do i still have to?

 

Also if i go ahead and give my notice but dont find anywhere suitable within that period what happens if i go ahead and remail in the property?

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't say what sort of tenancy you have. Is it a fixed term Assured Shorthold Tenancy, or has it rolled over to become a monthly periodic?

 

If the latter, the Landlord should have issued a s.21 notice giving you two months notice that he requires his property back. You do not give him notice, he has already given you notice.

 

Was it a s.21, or was it a s.8 (are you in arrears with the rent?)

 

If you stay in the property after the date requiring possession, he will take you to court to gain possession. You could be involved in paying costs of such an eviction procedure.

 

We need a bit more detail to be able to help you.

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have an assured shorthold tenancy and i have been given a section 21: notice requiring possession.

I have no arrears, i have always paid my rent on time. The reason for possession is because the landlord wants to sell the property.

 

Thanks

Michelle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right. Are you still within the fixed term of the AST? The LL cannot gain possession before the end of the fixed term and his s.21 notice must give you two clear months notice to regain him possession at the end of that fixed term and this cannot be less than 6 months from the beginning of the AST.

 

If you do not leave at the end of that fixed term, he will have to apply to the court for possession which might take a few weeks. However, he will then not be inclined to give you a good reference. Difficult for you.

 

Did the LL protect your deposit? Did he notify you of the details of which scheme it is in?

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

the tenancy agreemnet started on 27th nov 2008 (this is the 2nd one the 1st started 11/07)... it has a 6month clause where either myself or landlord can give notice after this time.

the notice is dated 15/06/09 and states i must vacate after 27th august.

 

my deposit is in a protected scheme.

 

so now i have notice do i still have to give 1 months notice or can i just leave anytime before 27th aug?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So he has given you the required notice.

 

If you wish to leave before 27/8 then yes you would have to give your LL a month's notice but I believe this would have to end on 27th of the following month - and if that is the case, you are too late to give notice to end on 27 July so there is no advantage to you to do so.

 

I am not absolutely clear about this -- perhaps one of the legal bods on here can confirm or correct?? What does your AST say on the subject of notice?

 

However, since your LL wants you to leave, if you wish to leave earlier than 27/08 he may be happy to come to an arrangement for you to do so, otherwise you will be responsible for rent up until that date.

 

It must be upsetting for you to have to leave your home, but the LL is within his rights and it will be much better for you to do things amicably. Hopefully he will give you a good reference and return your deposit without any problems.

 

Good luck!!

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not absolutely clear about this -- perhaps one of the legal bods on here can confirm or correct??

 

I don't think you do have to give notice, he's already done that by way of S21, so if you found somewhere to move tomorrow you could go. I say this because at my firm, this happened recently, I gave S21, and in the next few weeks the tenant found a property that had to be taken immediately. Advice given was she didn't need to give notice because the agreement allows for either party to give notice, this had already been done by us. But we weren't really sure and are known for being incredibly soft with our tenants! So, I'd like to know as well please legal bods!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

thanks for both your responses.. is there anywhere i can go or check to be sure?

i would ideally like to move out before the end of this month but as i havnt given notice i am unsure where i stand.. i dont want the landlord chasing for another months rent, as i wouldnt beable to afford to pay a months rent, a months deposit and a months rent on a house that i am no longer living at!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you clarify for me please, Planner - if the LL issues an s.21 notice for possession on a specific date are you saying that T cannot just leave on that date, but has to give notice to LL in return??? - or are you saying that if tenant wishes to leave BEFORE that date, T must give correct notice?

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you clarify for me please, Planner - if the LL issues an s.21 notice for possession on a specific date are you saying that T cannot just leave on that date, but has to give notice to LL in return??? - or are you saying that if tenant wishes to leave BEFORE that date, T must give correct notice?

 

Leaving on the date on the s.21 without notice is a bit ambigous but I think you would get away with it if the LL ever took the issue further.

 

Leaving before the date on the s.21 without correct notice is a definate no no.

 

Leaving after the date on the s.21 without correct notice is asking for trouble imho.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...