Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I have not. I will probably do that
    • Based on ECP's previous, what will definitely happen is this. They will send more idiotic letters. After they will send a Letter of Claim, and it is essential that your brother replies at this point to this to show them he would be big trouble in court. Next it is highly likely (but not certain) that they will crawl back under their stone and that will be the end of the matter. The slight worry is that if they do do court it will seem a likely story to a judge that your brother has no connection to the ticket, when it was him who appealed and replied to the Letter of Claim.  Indeed I think it would seem the lot of you were playing games with ECP and with the court by getting unconnected people involved and then later deny they were involved. So be aware there is that slight risk. You talked about "a mess" in your first post, and you weren't wrong. Someone hires a car and gets a ticket.  There is an appeal.  Who appeals, the hirer?  No, the hirer's mate's son.  Obvious! There is an approach for help to a consumer website.  By the hirer?  No, by the hirer's mate's son's brother! This is so damn silly and totally avoidable. Anyway, it seems the decision has been made for your brother to carry the can so whatever consequences will ensue will ensue. 
    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Machine ate my money!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5402 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, my first post as i'm new to the forums!

 

Heres my story, i park every day in an all day car park which charges £3.50 standard for all day parking. It is owned by VCS (vehicle control services).

 

I paid £3.50 into the machine, and it came to £3.40, so i pressed refund. No money came out, and the meter reset to £0.00.

 

I had no change left, so left a note explaining this in my window.

 

I also attempted to call the number on the car park gate to no avail as the number was invalid.

 

I recieved a ticket, which i appealed and got rejected. They basically said that I should have called the number on the signs (which i did), and that even though i didnt intentionally park against the rules, i did not display a ticket therefore the PCN is valid.

 

My arguement back to them was that if they can provide me with evidence that the machine on that day was NOT £3.50 excess of the amount of tickets issued, then theyre case would stand if court proceedings were to happen. As it happens, I checked the machine today and it is out of order! I sent them a picture of this.

 

As they are demanding the £80 before this saturday (4th July) and will increase the charge to £120 if it isn't recieved by this date, any response would be much appreciated!

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore

 

its not a PCN its a PPC

 

there is nothing they can do to you

 

do some reading in this forum

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the advice given, however I do have reservations in this particular case.The OP states he parks there everyday so what's to stop VCS playing hardball & clamping the car in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't clamp a car because they say you owe them money, they can only clamp as a remedy for trespass, and I think they have to have signs up stating that clamping is in operation on that particular site. Somebody will correct me if i'm wrong jed

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for all your help guys.

 

Can they not go to the DVLA for my details and get their money via that route?

 

I think i'll use another car park from now on to avoid any scare tactics.

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you sign a contract at anytime when you got out your car....no.

 

so there is nothing they can do to you.

 

have a read of a few threads in this forum..its a [problem].

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they not go to the DVLA for my details and get their money via that route?

They can apply to the DVLA for the details of the Registered Keeper and would most likely get them, but as far as DVLA is concerned, that is all they help they will get. After that it is up to them to pursue you.

 

Given you have 'appealled' :rolleyes:, they most likely have your details already so going to the DVLA would seem a little pointless.

 

As others have said, as this is not a ticket issued on behalf of the local council, the standard advice is just ignore and they should eventually go away. The norm. is around 3 PPC letters, 2 DCA letters and 2 Solicitor letters depending on the PPC pursuing. As you have 'appealled', you may get a few more as it will take them a little longer to cotton-on that they are onto a loser.

 

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

They can apply to the DVLA for the details of the Registered Keeper and would most likely get them, but as far as DVLA is concerned, that is all they help they will get. After that it is up to them to pursue you.

 

Given you have 'appealled' :rolleyes:, they most likely have your details already so going to the DVLA would seem a little pointless.

 

As others have said, as this is not a ticket issued on behalf of the local council, the standard advice is just ignore and they should eventually go away. The norm. is around 3 PPC letters, 2 DCA letters and 2 Solicitor letters depending on the PPC pursuing. As you have 'appealled', you may get a few more as it will take them a little longer to cotton-on that they are onto a loser.

 

Thanks for the info! But christ the 3 PPCs, 2 DCAs, and 2 solicitor letters sound a bit scary. Is there a chance they would ever pay me a visit to the address I provided for correspondence? I suppose I could always just say he doesn't live here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pay you a visit? No. That is trespass, invasion of privacy or harrassment.

 

Of course, if you have a driveway you could have some fun.

 

1. Buy a clamp

2. Put a sign up near your chimney

3. Use some water based yellow paint to put double yellow lines along your road.

4. Invite the neighbours around with their camcorders for an evening of joviality.

5. Invite the parking creeps around to collect what they are due plus a tip.

 

When they arrive, get them to park on your drive and invite them in for a cuppa. Go to the kitchen and then LEGGIT around the back and clamp the bar stewards.

 

What they are due? A CLAMP

Their Ttip? Don't park on private property unless you are happy to pay the £105 removal fee.

 

Call the local newspaper to take some pics.

 

Enjoy

 

 

On the otherhand, just ignore them. you will get a dozen letters all incresasingly more serious with words like....

 

Final DEMAND

Final final demand

Really final demand and we mean it this time

That's it, this is yoiur last chance

We won't go away

We'll take you to court

 

This is your final chance

No more chances aftre this letter

Pay now or else

Cough up

Final cough up chance

Definitely your last opportunity

 

The end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info! But christ the 3 PPCs, 2 DCAs, and 2 solicitor letters sound a bit scary. Is there a chance they would ever pay me a visit to the address I provided for correspondence? I suppose I could always just say he doesn't live here!

 

If they turn up ask them to get off yer land! The only ones who should come to your door are court baliffs, and they'll write to you first (not to mention the fact you've got to loose in the county courts too!!) Follow the advice on ere!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info! But christ the 3 PPCs, 2 DCAs, and 2 solicitor letters sound a bit scary. Is there a chance they would ever pay me a visit to the address I provided for correspondence? I suppose I could always just say he doesn't live here!

Whilst a debt collection agency can have a private debt collecter visit you, they are effectively powerless. If you tell them to leave and don't come back, they have to leave your property (or face trespass charges). If they hang around and bother you, they then face charges of harrassment.

 

If you need to, you can tell the DCA your in dispute over the costs. Once advised, the DCA should not persue an account in dispute.

 

The unfortunate thing is that most (if not all) the the above (PPC, DCA, solicitor) are at best 'friends' who probably sit one desk apart, or at worst the same person. Rules and laws mean very little to them and they just prey on your emotions to try and force payment.

 

You are under no impediment to communicate with them. As a private company they have no legal backup to make you do so. And the ticket is no more than an unsolicited invoice - their invitation to treat.

 

You, out of sheer goodwill, have appealled to them advising of their faulty equipment - which they seem to have acknowleged through deactivation of said equipment - yet they still pursue you. That is because the appeal system does not really exist. It should really be termed an informaton extraction system, because thats all they use it for - getting more details to try and forge a case from nothing.

 

So, yes, seven plus letters does sound daunting, but just file them away as evidence somewhere when they land through your letterbox. Console your partner when they get itchy feet over the whole deal and live on in the comfort that the more letters they send to you, the more money they are wasting and just maybe one day they will see the [problem] no longer pays off.

Edited by Turtle1000
Incorrect info removed

 

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your advice guys, I was actually going to call them today to ensure they got my 2nd email appeal. But now i'm going to take the common advice on here, completely ignore anything from them, find a new car park, and collect the nice threatening letters to stick on my fridge.

 

Makes me wonder though, providing you don't get clamped, you'd never have to buy a (private car park) ticket again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes me wonder though, providing you don't get clamped, you'd never have to buy a (private car park) ticket again!

 

I'm sure you said that with tongue-in-cheek tengumask, but I'm sure you agree that not paying for valid parking is not supported or condoned on CAG.

 

If you have parked and received a genuine service for the fixed fee you accepted (pay and display) then you should be happy enough to pay for that.

 

If, having done so they try to charge you for having one wheel 2inches over a white line, then you will get all the support you need from CAG members. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst a debt collection agency can have a private debt collecter/baliff visit you,

 

naughty!

you used the word bailliff in the same msg as the word DCA!

never confuse the two!

they certainly cannot send a bailliff around,

slip of the fingers i hear you say!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

naughty!

you used the word bailliff in the same msg as the word DCA!

never confuse the two!

they certainly cannot send a bailliff around,

slip of the fingers i hear you say!

 

dx

Darn it :oops:

 

I've edited the post to remove the incorrect info.

I was thinking of adding something about only a court appointed bailiff could do anything with power, but decided against it.

 

Thanks for pointing it out dx

 

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure you said that with tongue-in-cheek tengumask, but I'm sure you agree that not paying for valid parking is not supported or condoned on CAG.

 

Yes it was said very much tongue in cheek, I'm more than willing to pay the fees for any service I use, but like you said, i'll seek the advice of caggers when they try to bite off more than they can chew!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes me wonder though, providing you don't get clamped, you'd never have to buy a (private car park) ticket again!

The difference being between intentionally defrauding the landowner and being penalised for minor (and often insignificant) errors against unfair terms where the prescribed tariff has been paid and especially where no loss to the landowner has been experienced.

 

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

had my 2nd appeal rejected, they basically repeated what they said in their first rejection - i didnt have a valid ticket on display. They completely ignored the fact that their machine is faulty!

 

Anyway, going to keep to the sound advice on here and just keep their letters for future reference.

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...