Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • look up on land registry who owns the property then get in contact with your local environmental heath dept.   dx  
    • Hello all,   I have recently moved into a new property. The bedroom window is facing a bunch of commercial crates which have trash on top of them. The trash is maybe two metres away from the window, making it impossible for the window to be open (I am also afraid of rats being there).   The other windows of the property are facing a communal, enclosed area, which is making it difficult for the property to be properly ventilated. I have already raised this issue with my estate agency and they are trying do to something about it (to be honest, if I leave everything to them, this issue won't be solved until my tenancy is finished, and that is more than one year away).   I am asking for advice, or how could I approach this issue.   I have spoken to my council and, since they do not deal in private property, there is nothing they can do, at least this is what they have told me.   The property with the trash is not owned by my landlord. It is an open space, with big crates, closed off by a fence. If I could, I would climb those crates and remove the trash myself but I cannot. I also cannot climb out the window to reach the trash, as the window is too small.   At times, I see a car in that property but I have never seen the driver. I left a note in the car's window explaining the issue and giving my number. This was around a week ago and nobody came back to me.   
    • Hi   First off ALL Tenants need to re report all the different repairs again via their repairs procedure. Yes its good to get a list of all properties repairs with photo/video evidence signed by all property tenants but you all need to fight this individually as well as a group.   Next you all need to look up your rights on Repair i.e. The Right to Repair Scheme and also their Complaints Procedure.   http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1994/133/made   https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/repairs/right_to_repair_for_council_tenants   All Tenants need to take control back with these repair and ask in writing titling any letter 'FORMAL COMPLAINT' and stating the repair and why it hasn't been carried out to date and an exact date when it will be completed.   You also require clarification whether these Repairs come under the Right to Repair Scheme and if so why we were never informed of this. (delete or amend)   You also require copies of the following:   Right to Repair Scheme Policy (Not the Leaflet Repair and Maintenance Policy (Not the Leaflet) Solar Panel Policy (Not the Leaflet) Complaints Policy (Not the Leaflet) Equality & Diversity Policy (Not the Leaflet) When you get the above policies you need to take your time reading them and just think to yourself 'DID THEY DO THAT' in relation to your issue and if not mark it this way you build a list of what they haven't done/followed as per there own Policies and use it against them.   They will have time limits to complete repairs within for Emergency, Urgent, Routine repairs and if they exceed that time limit and need to extend it remember it is with you the tenants agreement not them telling you and tough you can wait.   (bear in mind any repairs during COVID-19 the time limits are now different and most routine repairs are stopped)  
    • I was on UC in late March, and recently received some quite non-committal message that the commitments would be returning, but no indication when.     If I remember correctly the expectation was that we could find at least one job per day to which to apply, or some such nonsense.   Given that the government can only guess how many workplaces will be safe :  1) to commute to/from at the time of job application; 2) to work in at the time of job application;    3) to commute to/from at the date of starting a job ; 4) to work in at the date of starting a job,  5) to commute to/from at the date permanent WFH is dropped; 6) to work in at the date permanent WFH is dropped,    and given that we have lost 20% of our economy, I fail to see how they can both reasonably and immediately mandate any minimum figure of jobs we must apply for whilst this virus just killed over 135 people in the UK (stats released today).  That is only down from 155 last week, and about 175 a fortnight back.   At this rate it will be another 7 weeks MINIMUM before the mortality rate is zero - if it ever reaches zero before the inevitable second wave.  
    • who has sent this 'letter of claim' come from and doe sit mention the pre action protocol and include a separate response pack? 
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 12 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
the_looker

UK CPS parking charges...the aftermath

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4002 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello, I found these boards a little earlier today after being charged £60 for my car being parked in a small car park in Scarborough that has been referenced in several other threads.

 

I've read all of your advice which seems to be to just ignore these horrible little men and they should go away. However, I haven't been able to find any accounts of what has happened AFTER you have ignored them. Did they go away and forget that you 'owed' them money?

 

Obviously your advice has been a great help as I nearly coughed up £60 but I don't want to make the wrong decision by not paying and acrew a huge fine.

 

Please put my mind at rest!

 

Many thanks,

 

the_looker

Edited by the_looker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

I'll move this thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.


 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have ignored NCP three time in the last two years (supposed charge for not displaying blue badge on dash err it's on sun blind in perfect view) anyway no court papers after all the threats they have made and no letters from me to them at all.

 

dpick


cannot find it A to Z

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

 

Halifax :D

Paid in full £2295

 

MBNA:mad: 20/03/2008 settled in full out of court

 

Capital One:D

07/07/2007 Capital one charges paid in full £1666

19/01/2008 recovered PPI £2216 + costs

 

Littlewoods :-D

12/08/2007 write off £1176.10 debt.

 

JD Williams charges refunded in full £640

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello the_looker

 

The Law is fairly smudged in some areas of this type of charge ...

 

The advice on this forum and research reveals many others like it, suggest you should ignore all the demands made of you - as the private car park companies (PCP's) do not have a leg to stand on.

 

This is NOT sound advice, especially depending on how the Courts decide to view the case.

 

Don't misunderstand me, some of the advice IS sound, but must not be confused with differing cases. Some charges can indeed be set aside in Court with good reason. Some will fall by the wayside and the 'fine' be 'forgotten' and unpursued.

Not all cases are the same, so the reader must not take comfort from the advice, as an across the board solution to all - and in particular, their own situation.

I am familiar and experienced with Courts, Law and Procedure. I looked long and hard at all the options and I considered a few possible avenues the Courts or the PCP might rely upon. I prepared good argument and can hold my own, but was also very aware of different aspects the Court may consider in the situation of parking on private land.

 

Let us look at how the Law interprets this type of charge ...

 

Firstly this is NOT a fine.

The fact is there are notices.

The Courts do not consider you must 'read' the notices, but considers in all probability you have at least 'seen' them.

The charge for parking is clearly stated.

There is no need in Law for them to prove who the driver of the car was at the time.

They do not need to define hours of operation I.e. 9 to 5 or 24 hours etc.

They cannot use bailiffs because this is not an enforceable 'fine/penalty'. So this aspect of any PCP correspondence is 'threatening' bull.

But, be clear, this is an enforceable debt, it is not considered in Law as an unenforceable 'invoice' or other such charge/cost. Albeit accepted by the Courts as 'extortionate'.

 

Yes a shock I know.

 

Their notice(s) state they will charge at the rate of "x" per day as 'blah blah' damages.

The Law states this is un-enforceable, and this element of their claim, depending on how far it goes, will not be upheld in Court.

 

This PCP will eventually - after five or so letters - cap their final charges at around £300 with an offer for you to settle at £200. This is absolute rubbish and can be ignored. The PCP claim the 'charge's will be to cover admin costs, letters, postage and of course DVLA details, which in truth amounts to just a few quid. The Court WILL throw this argument out.

The Courts state the Law about this type of additional cost as being a penalty. Private companies cannot use this area of Law, to enforce a penalty, thus it will fall at the hearing for them, in your favour.

 

But ..... this is a somewhat hollow victory ...

 

What cannot be ignored is the original bill of £60 will stand up in Court. The Court will not uphold the other charges imposed by the PCP but you will get hit with their costs - because ultimately you will lose the Court hearing.

 

Before going into Court I had researched and sought Legal advice, as I said above.

One thing had occurred to me and is something to remember; parking is to agree to their charge. Failure to pay does not become liable in Law under fines or charges levied by the PCP's, but can be enforced simply under the Law of Trespass.

 

In other words, plain and simple - this is private ground.

There are notices in effect giving a person 'permission' to park if they 'accept' there is a charge involved.

Failure to pay puts you right into the Law of Trespass. Even if the PCP does not rely on this area of Law, irrespective of what argument you put forward, this is what will trip you up in Court.

 

If you feel aggrieved and so minded, then write to the owner of the land complaining about the tactics employed.

Since this is private land that should not be used by the public, then notice to that effect should be on a barrier at the entrance - but that argument won't save you in Court.

Don't bother writing to the PCP appealing to their better nature with tales of woe, disability, time of day/night, blah blah, no one cares, and it won't help in Court either.

 

In my case, the PCP representative (the owner?) was a smug and clever ©üñ¿ - (although his secretary was very pleasant) - I gave the PCP a run for their money, and they got wrapped knuckles more than once by the Judge - but ultimately the £60 was still due the rest was squashed - (un)fair and square.

 

My advice ? - simple - it hurts, and yes PCP's are **** leaching bastards, but swallow and pay. On the other hand you may take the gamble not to and be successful, after all it costs the PCP to take you to Court, but with you picking up the costs this is not really a gamble for them.

 

Sorry to say this, but pay them their £60 and save yourself a lot of hassle.

 

Take care

sour cream

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no need in Law for them to prove who the driver of the car was at the time

 

I very definitely take issue with this.

 

A PPC must sue the person who entered into any contract - implied or otherwise, They cannot simply go after wither the RK or owner of the vehicle concerned. Privity of contract makes it absolutely clear that only the driver can be involved in an such purported contract.

 

A PPC must prove - in small claims court, on the balance of probabilities - who the driver was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What cannot be ignored is the original bill of £60 will stand up in Court. The Court will not uphold the other charges imposed by the PCP but you will get hit with their costs - because ultimately you will lose the Court hearing.

 

Sorry to say this, but pay them their £60 and save yourself a lot of hassle.

 

Take care

sour cream

 

Well that proves that you can safely ignore them until they try to take you to court! (which 99.99% of the time won't happen). The worst that could happen is you have to pay the original £60 so why give them it up front? Better to amke them spaend a fortune on legal costs (whivch they can't claim back) to get thei 60 quid :)

 

IMO the_looker should ignore the rest of sour_cream's post and stick with the tried and tested route of ignoring the [problematic] completely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I very definitely take issue with this.

 

A PPC must sue the person who entered into any contract - implied or otherwise, They cannot simply go after wither the RK or owner of the vehicle concerned. Privity of contract makes it absolutely clear that only the driver can be involved in an such purported contract.

 

A PPC must prove - in small claims court, on the balance of probabilities - who the driver was.

 

In this circumstance - wrong on both counts. The water is muddied under the Law of Contract, this is not to be relied upon, by either party.

 

But the law of Trespass is simple, the car is there and it should not be. End of story. Try that argument in court and see how far you get. A Judge would be remiss not to consider Trespass even if the PCP does not, or he invites appeal.

I did. And I feel it was dealt with fairly by the Judge.

SC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well that proves that you can safely ignore them until they try to take you to court! (which 99.99% of the time won't happen). The worst that could happen is you have to pay the original £60 so why give them it up front? Better to amke them spaend a fortune on legal costs (whivch they can't claim back) to get thei 60 quid :)

 

IMO the_looker should ignore the rest of sour_cream's post and stick with the tried and tested route of ignoring the [problematic] completely.

 

 

Hence my comment

On the other hand you may take the gamble not to and be successful, after all it costs the PCP to take you to Court, but with you picking up the costs this is not really a gamble for them.

 

Your choice, if, and it is an 'if' - it hits Court - you can add the costs to the original £60. And remember I was talking about UK CPS not a generalisation of all PCP's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you all very much for your advice. you have been a great help. i shall keep you updated on my situation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So we have a new poster, sour cream, who claims to have been beaten in court but in doing so rehearses every known (and entirely wrong) argument ever spouted by a PPC. Perky, what do you take us for? Do you think that we cannot see through this latest and laughable paper thin attempt to pull the wool over our eyes? Or are you back off your tablets again? All you have shown, sour perky, is that you have no idea of the law. If trespass is involved and not contract the action can only be taken by the landowner. This rules out PPC claims straight away, as per the recent Excel defeat in Wrexham. Further any damages would be non existent, as the laws of trespass are much more restrictive in this regard than contract. The statement that there is no need to prove the driver of the car, who is the only one that enter into any "contract", is moronic to say the least. Try to do better sour perky and next time at least attempt a bit of subtlety in your pretence - we know you are not the sharpest tool in the pack but there is no need to make it quite so obvious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let this be a lesson to you all. Don't ignore your responsibilities - they will come back to haunt you
Excelent user name for a troll

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep its the "perky nose" that gave him away


NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In this circumstance - wrong on both counts. The water is muddied under the Law of Contract, this is not to be relied upon, by either party.

 

But the law of Trespass is simple, the car is there and it should not be. End of story. Try that argument in court and see how far you get. A Judge would be remiss not to consider Trespass even if the PCP does not, or he invites appeal.

I did. And I feel it was dealt with fairly by the Judge.

SC

 

A parking charge of £60 can only be an contractual issue.

 

Any legal action for trespass can only be for actual damages by the ladnowner, not a pre-stated charge to an agent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let this be a lesson to you all. Don't ignore your responsibilities - they will come back to haunt you

 

 

troll alert!!!!

 

troll alert!!!!

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
;)

 
 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its countdown time again 10 9 8 7 6

 

maroondevo52 we all know whats next :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So we have a new poster, sour cream, who claims to have been beaten in court but in doing so rehearses every known (and entirely wrong) argument ever spouted by a PPC. Perky, what do you take us for? Do you think that we cannot see through this latest and laughable paper thin attempt to pull the wool over our eyes? Or are you back off your tablets again? All you have shown, sour perky, is that you have no idea of the law. If trespass is involved and not contract the action can only be taken by the landowner. This rules out PPC claims straight away, as per the recent Excel defeat in Wrexham. Further any damages would be non existent, as the laws of trespass are much more restrictive in this regard than contract. The statement that there is no need to prove the driver of the car, who is the only one that enter into any "contract", is moronic to say the least. Try to do better sour perky and next time at least attempt a bit of subtlety in your pretence - we know you are not the sharpest tool in the pack but there is no need to make it quite so obvious.

 

theres always one {person} in a forum, guess that must be you huh.

I am not a new poster.

I spoke of my circumstance only.

The area of trespass was interpreted by the Court from the notice displayed, suggesting the landowner is giving 'permission' to trespass or park in this instance for a fee, then uses his agent to administer and collect.

 

I also stated this was not an 'across the board advice' the same as the 'overall forums opinions' and or experiences cannot be considered as 'across the board advice' , merely the reader must make his own informed choice of what to do.

Edited by freakyleaky
insults are aginst site rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Insulting other users is against site rules. Posts containing insults will be edited.


[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Welcome to the Consumer Forums

Free advice and support to to solve your consumer problems.

You will soon discover what a friendly place this is and get lots of hints about standing up to consumer bullies or dealing with other consumer rights.

 

Which guide to the Sale Of Goods Act

 

New advice guide explains credit card rights

 

Help the CAG!!

Make a donation

 

ARE YOU A VICTIM OF COWBOY BUILDERS?

 

Has your RBS account been transferred to Santander?

 

Forum rules. Please read these before posting

 

PLEASE CHECK OUT THE CAG LIBRARY!! IT HAS LOADS OF USEFUL STUFF IN THERE. CLICK HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Firstly this is NOT a fine.

This appears to contradict your own advice. If there is, say, a £1 per hour charge, and a £60 ticket is issued for being over a line, or the permit has fallen down, then this very much constitutes a fine, and, as such, is a penalty.

 

The fact is there are notices.

The Courts do not consider you must 'read' the notices, but considers in all probability you have at least 'seen' them.

The charge for parking is clearly stated.

Agreement may be implied, providing that a test of reasonableness is satisfied. Specifically, would a reasonable person have seen and been able to understand the terms and conditions of parking.

 

Hidden, obfuscated, obscured or otherwise unreadable notices could not be considered to infer agreement.

 

There is no need in Law for them to prove who the driver of the car was at the time.
Perhaps, then, you could point out what makes the registered keeper responsible? The principle of privity of contract is well established.

 

But, be clear, this is an enforceable debt,
What is - The original parking charge, or the penalty arbitrarily applied?

 

Yes a shock I know.
I would suggest, rather, that you don't know.

 

What cannot be ignored is the original bill of £60 will stand up in Court.

I will not deny that this might occasionally occur, but it would not be on the basis of sound legal argument.

 

Before going into Court I had researched and sought Legal advice, as I said above.

One thing had occurred to me and is something to remember; parking is to agree to their charge. Failure to pay does not become liable in Law under fines or charges levied by the PCP's, but can be enforced simply under the Law of Trespass.

 

In other words, plain and simple - this is private ground.

There are notices in effect giving a person 'permission' to park if they 'accept' there is a charge involved.

Failure to pay puts you right into the Law of Trespass. Even if the PCP does not rely on this area of Law, irrespective of what argument you put forward, this is what will trip you up in Court.

The capitalisation of "Law of Treaspass" is confusing. Is there a specific statute or document that you are referring to?

 

Perhaps you could enlighten us as to the remedies available to the landowner against trespasser.

 

You have already stated if a person parks, it may be implied that they have entered into a contract. If the charge for parking is £60, it would be for the driver to show that this was unreasonable and unfair, or for the landowner to prove that it was not.

 

If the charge is £1, with a £60 fine, it would be for the driver to show that this was an unlawful penalty.

 

If it could be shown that a contract was not entered into, the landowner might sue for damages arising from the trespass. Which would have to be demonstrated.

 

My point being that you can't be chased to enforce contractual terms and for a tort arising not agreeing to those terms at the same time.

 

 

Sorry to say this, but pay them their £60 and save yourself a lot of hassle.
Or, continue to ignore them, on the basis that their demands are unlawful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear oh dear Perky, what did I say about that temper? You are now telling us that an unnamed PPC (any guesses folks?) took an action in CONTRACT against you and the Judge found against you in TRESPASS. Thus making legal history in finding for the PPC in an area of law that was not even claimed or alleged. Someone around here is indeed a [edit] but I don't think its me.

Edited by steven4064
insult that Freaky missed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
theres always one {person} in a forum, guess that must be you huh.

I am not a new poster.

I spoke of my circumstance only.

The area of trespass was interpreted by the Court from the notice displayed, suggesting the landowner is giving 'permission' to trespass or park in this instance for a fee, then uses his agent to administer and collect.

Service + consideration = Contract. It is not some new offshoot of trespass.

 

I would suggest an appeal on this basis alone, given that it's a poor interpretation of the law by the judge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nope - basically the notice says you may park for a fee

it is private land.

 

people stop trying to apply every case as being the same - a car parked over a line thus taking up two spaces is wholly different, there is no charge here by the hour for parking ....

I spoke only of the car park mentioned by the OP

 

sc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Service + consideration = Contract. It is not some new offshoot of trespass.

 

I would suggest an appeal on this basis alone, given that it's a poor interpretation of the law by the judge.

 

:| things are so clear cut for some of you guys. :|

I spoke only of the incident with me at the car park the OP spoke about. I can't speak for anyone else's situation.

 

sc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...