Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problems with 1st credit - advice needed please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I am sorting out a problem for my OH.

We have been having trouble with the Reigate Rabble (1st Credit), they have been chasing the OH for a debt.

Sent off a CCA request at the beginning of May, they have just sent out a copy of some statements for the account but nothing else.

What would be the next thing to do.

 

Thanks for your time

 

JJ

 

Forgot to say that the last payment on the account was 13/01/2005

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

Finally got a response to your second letter today:

 

Thanks you for your letter dated 17th July.

Following you request, we have asked for a copy of the credit agreement in relation to your debt.

** ******** have advised us that the copy agreement is not avaliable to be supplied to us and we therefore remain unable to supply you with a copy. We are of course aware that in the absence of a copy agreement, we are not entitled to enforce or collect the debt and our file is noted accordingly.

 

We maintain that although currently unenforceable, the debt remains due and payable. Should a copy agreement be made available to us in the future, we reserve the right to resume our request for payment should we see fit.

 

As the debt has been previously acknowledged by payments having been made to the account, the default will remain registered at the credit refernce agencies for the relevant time period. In order for it to be updated to settled or satisfield, settlement would be required and your proposal would be welcome.

 

We look forward to your comments in due course.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Reigate Rabble.

 

 

 

My question is if they have defaulted us regarding the debt, when will the default start? as the last payment made was in Jan 05.

 

 

Thanks for your time

 

JJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Finally got a response to your second letter today:

 

Thanks you for your letter dated 17th July.

Following you request, we have asked for a copy of the credit agreement in relation to your debt.

** ******** have advised us that the copy agreement is not avaliable to be supplied to us and we therefore remain unable to supply you with a copy. We are of course aware that in the absence of a copy agreement, we are not entitled to enforce or collect the debt and our file is noted accordingly.

 

We maintain that although currently unenforceable, the debt remains due and payable. Should a copy agreement be made available to us in the future, we reserve the right to resume our request for payment should we see fit.

 

As the debt has been previously acknowledged by payments having been made to the account, the default will remain registered at the credit refernce agencies for the relevant time period. In order for it to be updated to settled or satisfield, settlement would be required and your proposal would be welcome.

 

We look forward to your comments in due course.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Reigate Rabble.

 

 

 

My question is if they have defaulted us regarding the debt, when will the default start? as the last payment made was in Jan 05.

 

 

Thanks for your time

 

JJ

 

that got a result anyway- good time for a F & F offer if you are that way inclined -at around 10%

 

or you could gamble and go via 31.16 and then get a court to rule it out

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Hi, after reading the Failure to provide a copy of the CCA, that the DCA was not allowed to register any details with the CRA, or have I got that wrong?

 

Thanks

 

JJ

 

in 99.9% of cases a debt does exist....the lack of a cca(or dodgy one) simply means that most likely it cannot be legally enforced- but you still owe whatever the proved debt might be ( there may be illegal charges etc to deduct )

 

the creditor will take the view that if you fail to make payments he is entitled to mark you CRA files accordingly CCA or no CCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do but I take the veiw that if they cant prove the debt what gives them the right to trash your credit history. Where do we draw the line? if this is ok then whats stopping me trashing anyones files by making up debts and then saying they havent paid them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i see your point woody-but my own view (not universally accepted i know) is that i am not denying that i owe the money- just their right to use legal means to collect

 

what gives them the right to "trash my CRA" is the fact that they too are members of a "club" just like we are and the members of their club have agreed to notify failings to repay debts in the required manner to their fellow members so that they may then make informed decisions as to whether to lend to the same person

 

(just as we help each other by warning of the shyster DCA's etc)

 

now, personally i've never been one for having my cake AND eating it!!

 

If i get rid of the debt I am philoshical about the fact that for the next 6 years my credit rating might be crap

 

(in fact in many cases it is no bad thing that the debtor cannot just go out and get into the same mess all over again)

 

again i stress JUST MY OWN VIEW

Link to post
Share on other sites

And I accpept what you are saying. However I have a dispute with Orange mobile phones at the moment for a debt that I genuinly know nothing about. They cannot prove it but have ruined my otherwise good credit rating as a result. The trouble with thier club is that they can do what they like whereas this club is moderated and if anyone posts balatant lies then they will have consequenses raining down on them from the cagbots (bless em)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice, if I remeber right the last payment was made late 2004 or early 2005, so all problems they cause will fall off in the near future anyway, so just let them try and find the agreement between now and the 6th year anniversary.

Or would it be worth trying a F&F payment with them?

 

JJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you make a F&F offer you would be admitting the debt & it will reset the Statute Barred clock back to day one.

 

Good point didn't think of that one.

 

Thanks

You can rest assured that whilst the Reigate Rascals would accept any payment with their customary GREED. It would only be a matter of time before they came back to you for the rest. Do NOT risk resetting the Statute Barred clock

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...