Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. I am really getting myself in a mess worrying about this and hope that someone can help me please...

 

I was one of four directors, running a small business until we had to go into liquidation in August last year. I was working as self-employed until May 09 but the work was not regular and so I have been temping for the last couple months, earning £256 per week.

 

I do still earn some money from other work but it isnt regular so I cannot count on that as extra income.

 

I was personal guarantor on the company vehicle HP and had a CCJ filed against me a couple of months ago for £16k. I am paying £5/month.

 

I am being chased by Lloyds TSB for the personal guarantee signed for the business bank account. The other 3 directors are also guarantors but it is joint and severable, so I am facing another CCJ action for a potential £20k.

 

During the early days of setting up the business I did get myself into quite a bit of personal debt. I still owe £6k on a personal loan and about £9k on credit cards.

 

As it stands, I am short on my essential outgoings by about £300 per month (I've only been able to clear everything by my additional earnings and my partner covering living costs, etc).

 

I am considering bankruptcy but my main concern is whether we would lose our home. We bought it in 2006 on a 95% mortgage, interest only. I assume we are currently in negative equity but cannot say for definite as no one has sold in our immediate area for some time. If we have negative equity, would the house be taken from us?

 

I'd really appreciate any advice. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Same here, my business closed last year we banked with Lloyds TSB the business account was £5k overdrawn and personal guanrantee for £775k plus all other debts, i was made bankrupt in Feb 09 our house is in neative equity as well, all my debts have now gone including the personal guanrantees and the business account has also been written off with regard to the house the OR informed me they had no interest as the house was in negative equity and as long as the mortgage is paid the lender can take no action to sell the property.

 

The house has to be in joint names for this to happen, we also have a rented house in joint names also in negative equity again the OR has confirmed no interest.

hope this helps

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all.

 

i agree with rippedoff15 if you are lucky enough to have neg equity every post i have read on this is the house stays with you unless there is a huge rise in house prices before dicharge then it might be a different situation.

 

regards

 

OOC

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the house is in negative equity you can buy the beneficial interest in the property from the OR for a £1.

 

From the Insolvency Govt Website:

 

Please note they will have to pay:

for a solicitor or licensed conveyancer to

act for them in the transaction;

£211 (as at April 2008) to cover the

official receiver's legal costs. This

amount must be paid in advance. It

includes an allowance for expenses that

may be incurred in the transaction. If the

allowance is not fully used, they will

receive a refund;

the cost of an independent valuation

unless you already have a very recent

independent valuation of the property;

the agreed purchase price for the

beneficial interest based on the valuation.

If your home is now worth less than the

amount you still owe on it, the price of the

beneficial interest will be set at £1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...