Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Financial & Interest Charges on old Vanquis debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5412 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Cabot Financial purchase an account i had with Vanquis Bank. The outstanding balance when assigned to Cabot Financial was £438.97.

 

I noticed on Cabot's paperwork that the balance is £460.90 so i wrote to them and asked why the debt had increased.

 

I have today recieved Cabot's response ..........................

 

"Following an assignment on 7th January 2009 from Vanquis of all their rights, title and interest in and to the account in question, we are entitled to charge interest at an equivalent rate to that applicable under the original agreement.

As you will appreciate, although Vanquis may have frozen interest on this account for a period of time it has at no time waived it's right to reinstate such interest; these rights are now vested in us"

Are Cabot allowed to charge me interest????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess they can add on whatever they want..but it doesnt mean you ever have to pay it.

They are not even legally entitled to a penny off you for the original debt nevermind for any interest.

Tell them to get lost & report them to the OFT/trading standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im still baffles as to how Cabot think they can add interest. The original agreement would have been terminated when i defaulted so how can cabot claim that they are entitled to charge interest under the original agreement?!?!?!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mr ton ............... you say that "They are not even legally entitled to a penny off you for the original debt" why?

 

Coz only a county court is legally entitled to obtain money off you & there is a proceedure for doing this like having all your outgoings taken into account beforehand etc...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do i write to Cabot and as the to provide documentation to prove at which point i have agreed to pay them interest.

Edited by drob
Link to post
Share on other sites

They can add what interest they like, but until they comply with the CCA request properly with a conforming agreement, they cannot ask for payment or legally add charges etc and you do not have to make any payment to them.

 

VOLVO

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can add what interest they like, but until they comply with the CCA request properly with a conforming agreement, they cannot ask for payment or legally add charges etc and you do not have to make any payment to them.

 

VOLVO

 

They have supplied a CCA, but surely this will have been cancelled when i defaulted with the OC (Vanquis)

 

This was purchased by Cabot from Vanquis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Drob,

 

Post up the copy of the CCA they have supplied, to let the experts view it, it may not conform to the regulations and may therefore, be uneforceable.

 

I use photobucket, as good as any.

 

 

VOLVO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copies of the CCA

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7415&stc=1&d=1238078204

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=7414&stc=1&d=1238078151

 

There is also a matter of £72 in unfair charges, Cabot have agreed to write down my account by £72.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot Financial purchase an account i had with Vanquis Bank. The outstanding balance when assigned to Cabot Financial was £438.97.

 

I noticed on Cabot's paperwork that the balance is £460.90 so i wrote to them and asked why the debt had increased.

 

I have today recieved Cabot's response ..........................

 

"Following an assignment on 7th January 2009 from Vanquis of all their rights, title and interest in and to the account in question, we are entitled to charge interest at an equivalent rate to that applicable under the original agreement.

 

As you will appreciate, although Vanquis may have frozen interest on this account for a period of time it has at no time waived it's right to reinstate such interest; these rights are now vested in us"

 

Are Cabot allowed to charge me interest????

 

There is nothing in the agreement allowing assignment to take place. However, under common law there is nothing to stop assignment providing the consumer is in no worse a financial postion than pre assignment.

 

Vanquis waived interest. Providing there is no fixed term of interest freeze in the agreement you came to with Vanquis, Cabot cannot change the terms of the agreement post sale. In other words, Cabot should have been aware of the agreement and if not their grievance is with Vanquis not yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would disagree with aktiv here. If you have something in writing (which I very much doubt) saying that vanquis are varying the terms of the agreement so that you don't have to pay interest then that is correct. HOwever, if they have just waived their rights for a period of time then they are quite entitled to demand those rights at any time in the future.

 

HOwever, the important thing is the default notice. Did you ever receive a default notice from Vanquis or a letter that the account was terminated? If you did receive either of those then it's game over and there is no way that Cabot can add any extra interest.

 

As you say, the fees are a penalty and you can claim them back from Cabot along with any interest that was applied on them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would disagree with aktiv here. If you have something in writing (which I very much doubt) saying that vanquis are varying the terms of the agreement so that you don't have to pay interest then that is correct. HOwever, if they have just waived their rights for a period of time then they are quite entitled to demand those rights at any time in the future.

 

HOwever, the important thing is the default notice. Did you ever receive a default notice from Vanquis or a letter that the account was terminated? If you did receive either of those then it's game over and there is no way that Cabot can add any extra interest.

 

As you say, the fees are a penalty and you can claim them back from Cabot along with any interest that was applied on them.

 

I do not have a default notice or a notice of termination from Vanquis. I have a letter from Vanquis statinf that a default notice was issued in April 2007.

 

I did S.A.R Vanquis but no default was in the paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is normal for a defualt notice to say that if you do not pay the arrears by the date shown that the agreement will be terminated.

 

Since the agreement has been terminated they have no right to add any interest

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is normal for a defualt notice to say that if you do not pay the arrears by the date shown that the agreement will be terminated.

 

Since the agreement has been terminated they have no right to add any interest

 

Do you suggest i write to Cabot to inform of this???

 

Cabot have offered to write down my account by £72 for the unfair charges, but they have refused to ammend my balance to reflect this. Do you think i should clain for the £72 seperately e.g County Court???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot have offered to write down my account by £72 for the unfair charges, but they have refused to ammend my balance to reflect this.

 

Sorry I'm confused about what you mean here. What is the difference between "writing down" your account and "amending your balance"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I'm confused about what you mean here. What is the difference between "writing down" your account and "amending your balance"?

 

 

The account contains £72 of charges that have been applied for late payments. I wrote to Cabot to ask for the £72 back as i believe these charges to be unfair.

 

Cabot replied and said it is nothing to do with them as the charges relate to Vanquis.

 

I then wrote back and told Cabot that as they have purchased the account then they have to refund the £72 charges. Cabot wrote back and agreed to write down the balance of the account by £72.

 

As Cabot are processing my information with credit reference agencies i asked them to ammend my account balance by £72 and record the correct information, they have refused to do this until i have paid the account in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent Cabot a letter and have told them that Since the original agreement has been terminated by Vanquis then Cabot have no right to add any interest.

 

I have also told them that as the assignment of the account is absolute I intend to reclaim the £72 charges from them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...