Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mbna - Settlement Offer On 2 Cards


HULMEC
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5416 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been sending reduced repayments to MBNA for the past 2 years. The total amount on both MBNA cards is just over £16,300.00 to which I make pro rata payments to all creditors these get £49.00 per month.

 

I get the usual phone calls etc all of which are ignored and the standard threat letters etc.

 

The calls over the past 2 weeks have increased ten fold ….but Oh whatever!

 

Last week I received a letter from them basically stating that due to the low payments they are scheduled to be written off as a bad debt and passed to external debt collection etc.

 

The letter then stated as a final attempt to demonstrate our good faith to resolve the debt they were offering me a reduction to £6300.00 to settle the accounts and would mark the accounts with a partial settlement and they will not pursue the remaining balance of £9700.00

Which is a good offer…However they are asking for me to call and one thing I do not do is call them and the offer expires on 27th June, 2009

 

Today I have received a letter from them sent via wait for it….SPECIAL DELIVERY…with a handwritten envelope and they are now stating that as a total final offer they will accept the following:

£159.00 per month for the next 125 months and no further action

Or as a total final gesture if I agree to pay £4000.00 against the full debt of £16300.00 MBNA will then consider writing the remainder off, this will be reflected on my credit file and even if I cannot get the funds immediately there are alternative options and this offer will only be valid up to 29th June, 2009

So in essence they must be totally desperate and I am seriously considering taking their offer up but I am not stupid enough to fall for their if’s or buts or considers....

 

What advice I would like is some direction on to how I can respond to them with the view of settling the debt. I cannot raise the funds within the next month so has anyone had experience into exactly how the response should be worded to cover all bases as I do not want as I have read on here the remaining balance being pursued in 2 years time and also how many months does anyone think I could repay in I thought over 3 to 4 months

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like they have no cca which is typical of mbna.

 

have you cca'ed them on these cards?

 

if not i would do so.

 

and when they fail to produce, it will put you in an even stronger possition to offer a very low F&F

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had something similar and just started my own thread.

 

This is what they've written:

 

As per our conversation today, I am pleased to confirm that Mbna have accepted £XXX to partially settle your credit card account. The current balances on the account is £XXX. Once the £XX is full paid sixty days after the first payment from June 2009, the remaining balances will be written off and you will no longer be pursued for the debt.

This will register as a partial settlement on your credit file for the next six years.

.............

Kind Regards,

XXX XXXX

MBNA

 

IF genuine then I'm interested, but also wary of the if's and buts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have written to me in an email "the remainder of the balance will not be pursued by mbna nor any other company" and it looks as if they are saying something similar to you. I guess that if you can afford to settle and know that that is an end to it then it is a tempting offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou all for your replies.:)

 

Coactum... it seems they must be so desperate with the current situation that they are prepared to make such offers....It is not that I can really afford to settle it is just weighing up the balance of probabilities to see which is the best deal for me and not them and how it will affect my life as I am dealing with multiple creditors.

By giving them £4000 yes it will be a massive saving against the current £49.00 per month they get as I have no concern of who they eventually pass the debt onto and also I cannot think of a more undeserving 'Bunch of Bankers' to give that amount to... but then again it is very tempting...

 

I have basically sent them a response via recorded delivery this afternoon asking them to verify and confirm what they mean by all their maybes and considers contained within the letter and in not so many terms said that I do not trust them until I see the whole terms in black or white and under no circumstances are I coming to any agreement over the telephone or until I get every point clarified...I will see what happens and keep you updated...

I probably wont even get a response from them now...In whcih case I will carry on as before and maybe they will reduce the offer further....but somehow I doubt it very much.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would even go as far as F&F on its own is no protection

you need to get them to agree that themselves nor any of their agents can pursue further payment.

 

just remember, in UK law there is no such thing as an F&F.

it is only a local agreement between two parties.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like everyone else, I want to be sure that if a settlement payment is made, but what are the views on the reply received by Coactum:

 

"the remainder of the balance will not be pursued by mbna nor any other company"

 

Is this sufficient?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignoring whether or not they sell on the balance for a moment I have another thought here. If MBNA sell the debt whoever buys will only pay pennies in the pound because they know that they might be buying into debts that might be unenforceable. If so, then what makes them think they are going to get payment where MBNA have so far failed?

 

I suspect therefore that for MBNA this is a damage limitation excercise. Whatever they can get in from you directly will undoubtidely be greater that that a third party would pat and therefore if negotiating settlement it would be handy to know how much those others will pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like everyone else, I want to be sure that if a settlement payment is made, but what are the views on the reply received by Coactum:

 

"the remainder of the balance will not be pursued by mbna nor any other company"

 

Is this sufficient?

 

i would be happy with that, but i would also insist the CRA file says SETTLED IN FULL, without any ref to partial.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the latest response I've received from them:

 

Attention XXXX

 

As per our conversation yesterday I am pleased to inform you that Mbna have accepted your offer of £XXX to partially settle £XXX of your credit card debt with Mbna.

 

 

 

This means that the remaining balance of £XXX will be completely written off and you will no longer be pursued for the debt going forward. This will register as a partial settlement on your credit file. However, will be full and final settlement with your dealings with Mbna.

 

Again, Mbna re-iterate that you will never be pursued for the remaining balance of £XXX and no other third party sources can pursue you for this ever.

 

.......

 

I think this is clearer, but any views on this would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had virtually the same message from MBNA.

As previously stated neither MBNA or any other company will pursue the remainder of the debt.

I am really tempted by it but dont want to get caught out. I have not found a single person who has managed to get a full and final settlement in writing from MBNA - does anyone else know of anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...