Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • EU deal replicated 'as far as possible' ... aka less than   "The British Government is continuing to work intensively on securing continuity with other countries. We have secured agreements – either signed or agreed in principle - that account for 64% of the UK’s trade with all the countries with which the UK is seeking continuity, should we leave the EU without a deal."   With what I've seen on that page I linked earlier, that would seem to be decidedly unambitious 'trade deals across the world larger than the EU
    • dx100uk - thank you for your advice.  I will send a SAR to Vanquis and really appreciate all the help on here.   I may have read your last sentence in the way that it was not intended but it has came across very judgmental and not helpful.  I have came on this site for some help, not to be judged.  If that was not your intention then I apologise as I realise text can be read in the way it was not intended.  
    • . I'm sorry but this is not correct. There is a very long established rule that you are required to exercise utmost good faith (uberrima fides) when becoming a party to any kind of insurance contract. This means that you have quite a strict duty to accept responsibility for disclosing any information which a reasonable person in your position might understand could materially affect the risk. I can imagine that the interpretation of this rule would not be applied quite so strictly to a very new and young driver – but the more that one has been driving and the more insurance policies one has held, then I think that the stricter  this rule becomes. It is also well established that one can misrepresent something simply by withholding information – by silence. I'm sorry to say that I think that this rule and the value of it is so self-evident that it is scarcely worth discussing. I wouldn't start raising this issue if I were you with insurers or the courts because you will come away with a bloody nose and loss of credibility
    • @unclebulgaria67 your point is particularly valid especially in regards to loss in the event of a claim. Irrespective of 2x SP30’s or not the vehicle is insured for its full market value. The insurers rating changes based on risk against those endorsements, where said risk calculation isn’t made available.    Also I question the validation of 22% in premium. Is that based on today’s risk profiling, or is that applied retrospectively to day 1 and can that be evidenced.    One thing that is very clear, is that to bring about any degree of misrepresentation the insurer has to have evidence that questions were asked in regards to the endorsements.   This was an auto renewal and when I’ve checked the Brokers electronic Copy on “My Policy’ at renewal, there is no section included relative to accidents in the last 5 yrs or Motoring convictions. Everything else relative to me and the named driver is listed. 
    • Here is what exposes Johnson & Co Commission document, makes for sober reading   Wonder if Snake Oil Singham has read and digested it?   https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/brexit_files/info_site/com_2020_324_2_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en_0.pdf
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
montrose

Cardinal Capital

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4034 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Received a card from Cardinal Capital stating that a agent would be in my area and will be calling to discuss things with me.

It also says that i should phone them and let them know if i will be available or not.

Do i have to see this person or phone them? I'm not even sure what debt it is they are dealing with. Can anyone help?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No you do not have to ring them or speak to them.

If and its a big if, they turn up at the door, just tell them to bugger off. Put what ever they want to discuss with you in writing

 

http://www.cardinalcapital.co.uk/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt collectors have zero power:)

 

Is there an address on the card?

 

You do not have to receive unwanted knuckle scarpers on your doorstep if you don't want to. (there is a template for this)

 

Also, do not speak to them on the phone.

 

Do you know what the debt in question is, how old it is, when you last acknowledged it, if there is correct paperwork etc?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have no idea what the debt is. Have looked through my paperwork and can't find anything with their name on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the planks this;

 

Cardinal Capital Ltd

PO Box 14493

Birmingham

B16 6FN

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing. I have noted your repeated attempts to contact me by telephone over the past few weeks/months and these have been duly logged by time and date.

 

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make such an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384

. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and, if you do so, you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Remember to print your name never sign it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter when a Debt colection Agency (DCA) threatens a doorstep visit. 'Here'

 

Beat me to it ALF!!!


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that will send that off tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Montrose,

 

Don't sign the letter..... they are known to lift your signature and use it against you...

 

You may have a statute barred account there and you wouldn't want them falsifying any form of acknowledgement:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks for telling me that probably would of signed the letter! Thanks for all your help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what kurvaface meant to say was "it has been alleged " that some of them might have lifted a signature and used it against someone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok thanks for telling me that probably would of signed the letter! Thanks for all your help.

 

one way around the signature aspect is to use a signatureh specifically for dealing with debts that you never normally use

 

for instance if you have a middle name and dont use the middle initial in your signataure then include it@

 

if you do use a middle name signature then dont use it

 

if you dont have a middle name make an initial up

 

spell your name a different way

 

not only will they not be able to lift your signature (and there is really no evidence yet that this has happened to my kinowledge) but if they do you will have concrete evidence of this happening

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You may have a statute barred account there and you wouldn't want them falsifying any form of acknowledgement:)

 

If it is SB then no amount of letters saying that you admit owing the debt will ever restart the SB clock again!;)

Some people appear to get confused with the whole SB and Limitations Act thing, once it has travelled it's course and no acknowledgement (in Writing) has been admitted then the debt remains SB no matter what may then transpire, nothing the debtor or creditor does can ever re-start the SB clock:D


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...