Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Some advice on how to handle CRS please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I found this forum after searching for CRS Credit Resource Solutions. I haven't had any problems with Gym membership, like a lot of people, they are chasing for £200 that a housing association have invoiced me for, for ground rent on a property that I used to own. I'm just after a bit of advice on how to deal with both the housing association and CRS.

 

Story goes as follows.

 

In 2004 I moved out of said property that ground rent was due on. However, when I moved out it had not been calculated for the full year, so I paid an estimated figure and the solicitor held funds in case it was above that amount (I believe it was £50). A couple of years ago the housing association said that I owed £200, and sent an invoice. The actual bill for that year was £250 over the estimated amount, nearly double that of the previous year. The solicitor had paid the £50 retained and then the Housing Assoc had attempted to contact me.

 

I asked for a copy of invoices, and when I found out that the bill was so much higher than usual, I asked for a breakdown. None of this was forthcoming, and through telephone conversations with the Housing Assoc I found that the increase was due to 'Cyclical Repairs'. I asked what cyclical repairs had been done that had cost so much, and there was no answer. I asked for the HA to confirm the breakdown in the post and I would pay the bill. I didn't receive anything.

 

I couple of months ago, out of the blue, I got another demand for the money. Again I contacted the HA and asked for proof of what had been done to warrant the extra amount. I was quite happy to pay the money, if they could prove exactly what had been done and when. I got copies of the original invoices and nothing else.

 

Now the debt has been referred to CRS, and they have sent a letter and are now calling my mobile 3 times a day and sending text messages. When I phoned them back and explained the situation, they said no problem, deal with the HA, but they are still phoning and texting (I believe it is all automated).

 

I guess I'm after some advice as to how to deal with the DCA and the Housing Association. I'm in the fortunate position where I am able to pay the money, but I baulk at the idea that a company can just send you an invoice that is nearly double the previous invoice, not be able prove the reason behind the increase, and then start proceedings as they have done. Any help gratefully received.

 

Many thanks

 

D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Telephone Harassment letter

Be sure to send it recorded delivery, and keep a copy of the original letter and the receipt for the postage.

 

Funny enough I have the same issue, sort of, with my HA, who have exactly 3hours 15 minutes to answer my formal complaint before I escalate it to the housing ombudsam:D

 

You need to get the HA's complaints procedure and follow that to the letter. It normally gives them three or four stages of the complaint process to sort the problem out before you can escalate it further, all in all it should only take a maximum of three months:eek:

 

You really should send your complaint in writing or any requests etc, these are much more likely to be read and taken seriously.

However, if you know the name of the Director of the HA or his personal assistant then write direct to him, cut out the irrellevant tittle tattle.

Just because they are a HA doesn't make them any different to any other organisation, or service provider.

 

You can send CRS the go forth and multiply letter, as it is nothing to do with them what so ever!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for the advice. I have started off the complaints process with the HA. The Telephone Harassment letter sounds like a good idea. Not sure that the 'go forth and multiply letter' is the right tact, as the debt is definitely mine, but it is whether the debt actually exists at all that is in question.

 

The DCA have now sent the legal action threat letter, which says it will cost an additional £150 if they go down this route. I think I'll adapt the general dept letter and explain I am still in correspondence with the HA via their complaints process. Agree?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the dca threat-o-matic computer does not recognise that you are willing to pay if the right info is forthcomming.

 

I would tell the HA that the dca they have employed isis harrassing you, and that ubtil the info you requested if provided they can whistle, and that you will rasie a complaint against both the dca and themselves with he relevant authorities

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Yes very well done! See it pays to ask sometimes, My HA has a final 7 days to produce a letter of apology before I report them to the HOS for fraud!!

Well Done though:D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...