Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

dual citi/DCA entry on Credit File


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have been reading for weeks and weeks and weeks now, there is so much good material on this forum but wading through it my eyes are bleeding.

 

First question (one of many so please be patient)

 

Two entries on my credit file are for the same debt, one by the original lender or credit card company, the other by the person collecting the debt or maybe who have purchased it.

 

How does one have the file amended if indeed it is able to be amended?

 

Also, the debt agency or have bought it or are collecting it have added a good few thousand to the debt in what I can only assume is interest. Is this allowable?

 

Does anyone have any idea on this?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I believe this is fairly normal. I had a default from a CC company, as soon as the DCA got hold of it they plonked another on it. The CRA forum has lots of this sort of stuff. IIRC some people have had them removed by sending in a robust letter but I think its the exception. Personally, I couldn't give a monkies ar5e because my file is shot to pieces.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have got 2 defaults for the same debtbut different amounts. The first one by the mobile phone company 3 for £132 then another this year by Lowell (who have purchased the debt) for £187. It looks to me like Lowell have added their own charges. I am currently disputing the entire debt but Lowell added the default in April when i stopped paying them.

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a default on an aledged Citi card, then a default appeared for the same amount on a 1st Credit loan. I contacted the CRA and the citi default disapeared. I never took out a loan with 1st and never got a notice of assignement form citi, all i've had from citi is a letter telling me if i still had an account with them and i got something abroad i would still be covered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a termination notice and a notice of assignment from the original crediter. If yes the DCA cannot add interest as the agreement which allows interest has been terminated. If you didn't then the DCA still can't add interest as you don't have an agreement with the DCA. There are cases where interest is allowed but we need more info on what you've had by way of notices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Applied for credit file on their free trial...

 

Credit file is smashed.

 

Noticed a duplicate entry for the same debt, one from the original lender the other from the DCA.

 

Spoke to Experian who stated that they would write to both of them asking for clarification and that it typically takes 14 days to sort out.

 

21 days later and the entries have been updated on the credit file in the usual monthly fashion AND there are still two entries.

 

Spoke to Experian again who said that if nothing is heard from them (and todate nothing had been heard from them) then they would keep writing, however Experian cannot sort the duplicate stating that the lender and dca add to my file so it must come from them.

 

This sounds tupid to me, if my file is showing two records for the same debt and neither of them are responding to requests to sort it out then surely after an amount of time the entries should be deleted?

 

In any case, I will be sending off for a copy of my CCA to the people I pay the money for the debt to (the dca) and I'll take it from there.

 

Thing is, like another debt I'm just starting to try and sort out the dca have added interest to the account, the lender shows the default amount and reduced amount but the dca shows the default amount and considerably more has been added on (as in almost 3k for what I can only assume is interest)

 

In this case it is citi-financial the creditor...(although it was never with them but with another company, citi-financial took them over and I think citi-financial have changed since..not sure) and the dca is Hillesden who use a dca called DLC...

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd like to think so wouldn't you...but thre weeks on and the file has received it's monthly update from both the creditor and the dca but experian stated that they would just keep writing to them but if nothing was heard they wouldn't be able to deal with it but would continue to request it dealt with.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Experian cannot sort the duplicate stating that the lender and dca add to my file so it must come from them.

 

Experian also have a legal obligation to hold accurate data. If there is a possibility of data being inaccurate Experian can remove it.

 

You need to be firmer in your letters to Experian. Point out it is their responsibility to settle a dispute, as a CRA they should be fully aware you cannot have 2 live entries for one debt, give them 7 days to correct the information or remove it, state you will take the matter further naming Experian as an offender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is stalemate then it's one for the Information Commissioner. I would certainly tell Hillesden that you are making a formal complaint to the ICO about the duplicate entry - they have been taken to task about breaching the DPA 1998 before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What dept at Experian do I write to re the removal of an entry?

 

One assumes Credit Expert is actually Experian

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What dept at Experian do I write to re the removal of an entry?

 

One assumes Credit Expert is actually Experian

 

I think you are better phoning them to be honest, from previous experience. If they do not adhere to your complaint contact the ICO as pinky has stated:-

 

https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us.aspx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are better phoning them to be honest, from previous experience. If they do not adhere to your complaint contact the ICO as pinky has stated:-

 

https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us.aspx

 

Phoning does not show a record. Writing is much better. There are contact details on their website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Experian have always used a standard letter to me when I've queried inaccuracies that say along the line of "we've contacted the organisation who added the entry and they advise it's correct".

 

Funny how this has happened 3 times now for 3 different companies, yet Call Credit and Equifax both get no response from all 3 companies.

 

Smells of something brown to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Experian have always used a standard letter to me when I've queried inaccuracies that say along the line of "we've contacted the organisation who added the entry and they advise it's correct".

 

Funny how this has happened 3 times now for 3 different companies, yet Call Credit and Equifax both get no response from all 3 companies.

 

Smells of something brown to me.

 

 

Oh the answer to that one is......Because we are a more respected company who dont get anything wrong.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoning does not show a record. Writing is much better. There are contact details on their website.

 

 

Understandable writing is much better, however, a first point of call would be beneficial by phone in my opinion, then the OP can speak to the ICO instead of wasting time sending letters, left, right and centre, just my personal experience, which has worked;)

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've now done both, I sent a letter in requesting the info be removed and I spoke to a supervisor of the customer services who arranged a call back and who did call back and informed me they would write to the initial creditor with a view to updating and if nothing was heard they would write again but would also other options. The duplicate entry is easy enough to see so it shouldn't be a problem.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have indeed taken a copy of the entire selection both by printout and by way of a screenshot, was the first thing I did.

 

I have since had an email (my requested form of contact) for expert stating that they are looking in to it and would I like to add any comments to the file which if I do has to be made in writing.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

as in have recently sent out some CCA requests....

 

but who do I subject access is is DLC / Hillseden or Citifinancial? (the account was originall Peoples Bank but it change to Citi and then Citi-Financial...

 

Where is the definitive subject access letter here and what is the charge? £10? postal order?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...