Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Squidward V Abbey Card MBNA


squidward
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5420 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I have been posting in the General debt Issues forum but think it's time to

move it here I hope it's now found it's home !

 

The History,

 

On the 1st April 09 I sent a CCA Request to Abbey card MBNA to which I no reply On the 22nd April I put the Account into dispute and stopped paying them Had various phone calls to my home mobile and work :eek: many of the calls I ignored and a couple I answered just to ask were my CCA was!

 

Well today 22nd June I received the CCA the tear off strip variety with current T&C's, now my question is this enforceable as it looks to have the T&C's printed onto both sides and not within the 4 corners. It also refers to "condition 11" of the terms and conditions provided so a second document.

 

Para 1.4 (b) refers to other conditions in 2.4 3.5 and 3.6 there is no 3.5 or 3.6 ?

 

Any Ideas as to the enforceability of this CCA ?

 

Link to CCA Agreement

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2242346.html

 

Thanks

 

Squidward

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has the prescribed terms on one side and your signature on the other. It is enforceable unless you can persuade a court that the two bits are not part of the same document. However, I would say that the balance of probabilities is that they are. Unfortunately.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven4064

 

Thank you for your reply

 

unfortunately they do seem to be the front and back of the agreement :mad:

 

Would there be any problems now in SAR and claiming back the charges?

 

Is there any other routes I can take as I really don't want to give these jokers any more of my money than I have to especially as I already paying 34.9% interest on a 9k balance !

 

Also while the account has been in dispute they have applied interest late payment and default charges no Default notice thou...

 

Any help on which way to go now gratefully received.

 

Cheers Squidward

 

P.S got this little gem in the post today.

scan0036copy.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you most certainly should reclaim charges. Start ASAP. If they take you to couurt in the meantime, countercalim for the charges.

 

And when I say charges, I mean charges plus the interest they levied on the charges at their rate of 30%, or whatever it is. And the 8% on top you are entilted to under s69 of the County Courts ACt 1984.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi One more question

 

The T&C's they sent are there current ones I believe they should have sent the T&C's from when the account was opened - does that mean there still in default or am I just clutching at straws ?

 

Cheers Squid ward

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the regulations, they can send current T&Cs in reply to a request under s78. However, that doesn't constitute an enforceable agreement.

 

I have jsut explained this on another thread - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/205714-cupcake-mbna-him.html#post2243723

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...