Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
    • If everyone who wanted or needed a permit could get one easily how would PCM make any money?    
    • Now I dont agree with some of the detail, and its a bit light on showing detailed analysis, but worth a two minute peruse   Tory wipeout and opposition until 2037 – the future facing a disunited right   https://link.news.inews.co.uk/view/61fb0feaaf01060b825d0999kwaja.7ca/e75bba7e  
    • A mass of Olympic commemorative coins that were issued in 2011, ahead of the 2012 London Olympics. But are any of them worth anything now?View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays charges before 03


crippla2k
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

All,

 

I sent through a SARN to Barclays and they sent me back a summary report that covers fees and refunds from '03-09 not the full statements, has anyone else had this and has it been truthful?

 

I've had an account with them since 97 though. Is there anyway I can request the same charges from 97-03?

 

I have a lot of my old statements from between 97 and 03 as well, if Icant request the statements from them can I send them through to Barclays requesting the charges to be paid back as well?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi C2K,

 

The summary report sheets may not be adequate if they don't give a specific date for each charge.

 

You should write back to B's confirming that their reply is not adequate and you require either copy statements or a list which gives a date for each charge.

 

Confirm you also require statements going back to '97 which you know they hold and to which you're entitled.

 

Give them a further 14 days to comply or you'll report to the Info Commissioner's Office and/or seek enforcement through court.

 

Also, see items 18 and 19 here - The Consumer Forums - Bank charges templates (consumer)

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick,

 

Thanks, I gave them a quick call to see what the issue was, and they said I could go into any branch and request all statements, which I did today.

 

I went into the branch today and told them I had sent through a SARN with which Barclays were non compliant, the branch then proceeded to put in a request for all my statements as I told them I had paid £10 already and they were non compliant they agreed to send all statements at no charge to me within two weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi C2K,

 

If you are happy to wait another 2 weeks, that's fine. However, be warned that you may receive nothing and will then have to write to complain.

 

I would send in a letter to put your complaint, about their failure to comply with the SAR, on a formal footing.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

ok barclays havent sent through my statements, ive sent through an LBA gave them 14 days on top of the 40, have been into a branch twice now, so think i need to file a claim with the courts to get my statements,

 

does anyone have a Poc that I can use??

 

ive found this one

 

PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

 

 

1. The Defendant is a Data Controller within the meaning of the Data Protection Act and is responsible for the processing of data of which the Claimant is a Subject.

 

2. The Claimant has account(s) numbers ******** with the Defendant which was opened on or around 1998.

 

3. On 30th May 2009 the Claimant sent a Subject Access Request, pursuant to Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to the Defendant.

 

4. The Defendant has failed to comply.

 

5. By virtue of the Defendant's failure to comply with the Subject Access Request the Claimant has suffered damage

 

6. The damage caused is:

 

Extra costs incurred in addition to court costs, due to the Defendants failure to comply - this includes the cost of additional correspondence, numerous phone calls and time spent preparing documents and seeking legal advice, I estimate this cost to be £75

 

7. The Claimant seeks an order that the Defendant do comply with the Claimant's Subject Access Request

 

8. Under the terms of Section 15(2) of the Data Protection Act 1998, where the Defendant contests that information requested under the Claimant's Subject Access Request is not included within the scope of Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998, the Claimant requests that the Court inspects that information, and where it finds that the Defendant's opinion is unfounded, that it orders such information be included within the information supplied to the Claimant under the Subject Access Request.

 

9. Damages and costs within the discretion of the Court.

 

 

 

I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true

 

 

Signed:

 

 

Date:

 

is this ok???

 

And do I use the same N1 form to lodge the complaint?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a guide to this in the Bank Templates Library - The Consumer Forums - Bank charges templates (consumer)

 

Items 18,19 and 20 refer. You must adapt the template to reflect your own case's needs.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Good on ya !!

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi C2K,

 

I can't say as the images are too small to read. Can you repost or link to a larger format.

 

This may help you - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crippla,

 

The letters are their standard response and should not deter you from your present course of action.

 

While you await the statements for earlier years (through court action for non-compliance), you should work on putting together your Schedule of Charges for the charges data that you DO have.

 

You could file a court claim now for the last 6 years and then, if/when you get the earlier data, you can file an Application to amend your claim using form N244.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok guys i have had a small success, i have managed to get hold of my statements from when my account was opened (dec 98 - date),

 

Could do with some advice though, i sent off a LBA last Friday (giving them two weeks to pay up on the last 6 years) so the question is

 

do I start the process again (reuest for repayment etc)?

 

or do i send a letter now as an ammendment to the last one and give them till the 25th (as previously to respond)?

 

or do i just send a new LBA with a new schedule and give them 14 days??

 

Now that theyve given me all my info I have to cancel my court claim, just wondering if anyone knows how I do this??

 

thx!!!

Edited by crippla2k
order of words
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crippla,

 

This will be of great interest to anyone seeking older statements and well done for pressing on with this.

 

Send a new LBA including all the penalty charges and give them 14 days.

 

Write to Barclays and say you are now prepared to discontinue the non-compliance court action if they agree to pay your court fees and any damages you sought. Otherwise, you'll leave the case running to d/w these aspects.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

for everyone's benefit, I sent off the SARN for the most recent 6 years, and didnt receive anything I had to start court proceedings for this set of statements (I used the POC template from this website)

 

For the previous years (98-03), I was told I could request them from any branch, so I went into my local branch and badgered them, telling them that I had paid (via the £10 PO) and that I had started legal proceedings against barclays (it has now been in excess of 3 months since I started the process, they kept telling me 2 weeks and I had to go back in every 2 weeks till I received them)

 

I finally received them this morning. It is unlikely that they will send you the old statements via the SARN request. I would recommend going into the branch and requesting them but be persistent (there is a £5 charge but as they didnt send me the statements on time or correctly they refunded it for me, at my request)

 

If you go into a branch and ask them to phone the people dealing with the request (when it doesn't happen the first or second or third time) they will tell you they can't, this is a lie, the lady phoned the person responsible (she did this in front of me yday) and he sent them out the same day. And I received them today

 

The guys name is James Haw. Hope this of use to others in the same boat.

 

Looking at my statements Barclays used to chrage £5 for unpaids up until 2001 and then ramped it up to £30/£35, the scumbags!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll rely on s.32 of the Limitation Act 1980 - Limitation Act 1980 (-), swarb.co.uk

 

However, you don't need to go into detail about this in your LBA. You can d/w this when you do your POC to go in with your N1 Claim form.

 

Add a paragraph to say:-

 

I am fully aware of the Limitations Act 1980 with regard to reclaiming charges older than 6 years and will rely on s.32 of this Act to address this issue.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi guys, ive only got 12 days left since the 8 week limit they placed expires, i didnt lodge a POC before the suprement court judgement due to finances so just wondering what happens now??

 

Do I submit the govan POC or is there something that has been developed for England?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crippla,

 

Since the OFT decided not to appeal the last Supreme Court ruling, the bank charges reclaims process is no longer staightforward.

 

See here for Bankfodder's opinion - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/246382-new-template-claiming.html

 

:(

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok so i've written back to them using this template from MSE

 

i'll let everyone know how it goes

 

"Dear Sir or Madam,

I am writing in response to your letter dated 22nd December 2009in which you have advised my complaint about unfair bank charges is to be closed and have given me eight weeks to respond.

I feel that in issuing these charges you have broken the FSA’s regulatory principle to ‘pay due regard to the interests of its customers and treat them fairly’ and I am writing to request that you do not close my complaint but instead take the following new grounds into consideration:

The charges are unfair under s.140A(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and contrary to the requirement of good faith, having caused a significant imbalance in our relationship and a detriment to myself, and under regulation 5(1) of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, in the following respects (save for, in the case of the later, those matters which relate to the level of the charge as against the service supplied in exchange):

(1) The charges were excessive and punitive in comparison with the costs to the bank caused by my conduct which triggered the charges.

(2) The charges were set by reference to the overall cost to the bank of providing current accounts to all of its customers which held such an account, rather than merely to the cost of my conduct thereby effectively requiring me to subsidise the provision of current accounts by the bank to other customers.

(3) In the premises the bank did not deal fairly as between myself and its other customers.

(4) The existence and quantum of the charges were inadequately and/or insufficiently explained and/or drawn to my attention either; when my account was first opened; when I gave an instruction which would result in the levying of a charge; or otherwise before any particular charge was applied.

(5) The circumstances and manner in which the charges were levied created potential for the application of multiple charges and the levying of charges to give rise to the application of further charges.

(6) The complexity of the charges and/or the circumstances in which they were levied.

(7) The nature of the charges and/or the circumstances of their application was such as to cause me inherent difficulties in predicting the incidence and amount of such charges in advance.

(8) The absence of any effective competition between providers of current accounts which restricted my ability to chose a current account operated on terms which did not provide for charges such as (and/or equivalent to) those levied by your bank.

(9) The charges were (or had the potential to be) excessive in comparison with the level of borrowing which triggered the levying of the said charges.

In particular, and without prejudice, the burden of proof for the above rests onBarclays to prove that the circumstances of our relationship are fair (pursuant to s.140B(9) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974), so unless you can provide evidence to the contrary I expect a refund of the full amount requested by return.

I now ask that you repay the amount I have previously requested of £xxxxxxx. I enclose a schedule of charges for you as well.

I look forward to a full response to this letter within 14 days and if I do not receive a satisfactory response I intend to pursue my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service or small claims court at the earliest opportunity.

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...