Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I don't think I've ever seen someone appeal a mags court decision on fare evasion, JK, but as you say in this case TiredDodo has pleaded guilty. It is possible to challenge, as below. HB Appeal a magistrates’ court decision: Overview - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK How to challenge a decision by a magistrates' court. Including how to get a fine reviewed, if you did not know about your case, how to appeal to the...  
    • Update! I have now opened the mail from Barclaycard. I am assuming that their letters were prompted by my confirmation to them of my change of address, which I had advised them of twice. They are treating my change of address notification as a "General Data Protection Regulation Right of Access Request"  and state that I have made a "Right of Access Request. They are asking me to provide valid indentity documents! I have made no such request and am minded to ignore their request for extra information? I should add that their letters were sent to my correct current address!
    • Are you allowed to appeal if you plead guilty?   I know you appeal the sentence, but the criminal record formed from your guilt would surely remain?   I'm not sure if your able to appeal a crimianl record if you plead guilty are you?
    • DX: I did not pursue Link after I got the CCJ amended to monthly payments. Pretty sure the CCJ does not mention reviews, I do have the CCJ somewhere, I will have to look it up in storage. It is as mentioned on the thread you referenced  in your post #28. The Barclays loan was taken out in September 2004 for 60 months! Current Balance remaining approx £2K. On checking back my past correspondence with Barclaycard about this loan, there was a history of them ignoring my letters and offers to pay, and I even had problems in obtaining their bank account details for them to accept my payments! I have received strange correspondence from them too, one referring to insurance which I did not have. They seem very disorganised! Barclaycard told me to pay "Masterloan" a while back and I now receive regular statements and arrears notices from "Personal Loans from Barclaycard" clearly marked Masterloan, they changed the account reference number! I have never requested a CCA on this account. I advised them of my change of address last September, but they are still sending, until today, statements etc. to my old address! I have received 2 letters from Barclaycard Loan today though, not opened them yet!!
    • Yes, a few months ago. They wrote back saying there was no CCA and the debt was unenforcable. I then started gtting bombarded with threatening emails from their 'litigations team' which have been sent to spam. I've now recieved the letter before claim with the PAP form enclosed, but still no CCA or even a letter from them to say the debt is deemed enforcable. Thank you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

B&Q faulty tap


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya

 

im new to this forum and was hoping to get some advise.

My sis bought a sink from B&Q which came with a tap. A few months later, she had several leaks in her flat and has had issues with the elcetricity in the communual areas.

A plumber has confirmed the tap is faulty. As a result of this faulty tap she has been charged over £500 for the electrican, plumber etc etc

 

She has also suffered ill health was seeing a specialist doctor during time, and all the stress has not helped the situation

 

Im in the process of writing to BQ now to claim for all the costs she has incurred and also compensation for the stress etc

 

Any advice from anyone, is it possible they will pay up?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am loss to understand how a faulty tap can cause electrical problems in a communal area, and lead to stress,and, presumably, claims for compensation.

 

The only way a tap can develop a fault is if the ceramic disc or washer fails, which would lead to water coming out of the spout and into the sink. Any other leaks would be down to faulty installation, not the problem of the shop.

 

Any competent plumber would check for leaks after installation. You say a plumber has confirmed the tap faulty.In what way is it faulty, and why was this not spotted by the person who originally fitted the tap.

 

I suspect that B and Q will only replace/refund the cost of the original tap.

 

It is possible to claim for consequential loss, but is not as easy as you appear to think it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am loss to understand how a faulty tap can cause electrical problems in a communal area, and lead to stress,and, presumably, claims for compensation.

 

The only way a tap can develop a fault is if the ceramic disc or washer fails, which would lead to water coming out of the spout and into the sink. Any other leaks would be down to faulty installation, not the problem of the shop.

 

Any competent plumber would check for leaks after installation. You say a plumber has confirmed the tap faulty.In what way is it faulty, and why was this not spotted by the person who originally fitted the tap.

 

I suspect that B and Q will only replace/refund the cost of the original tap.

 

It is possible to claim for consequential loss, but is not as easy as you appear to think it is.

 

I have to agree....Unless there was a crack in the lower threaded part then any fault is almost due to the installation.

 

I have this week installed a new bathroom, im no expert and there were a few leaks here and there that I managed to fix, I fail to see how a leak can cause £100s of pounds of electrical damage, surely all the joints should be checked before turning the mains water back on ?

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i cant believe it either!

 

2 plumbers have confirmed its the tap - so i need them to give me a report. tp pass to B&Q.

 

Water must have gone into the electrics, hence the lights went off. electrican came out and fixed it, then the next day it starting triping, so he had to come out again and said there was still water in the electrics..

 

so far i have been charged for 2 plumbers, electricans and the management comany have charged me for the inconvenince it has caused them - liasing with the contractors. they would not let me deal with it!!!

 

thats why its been stressful, the bills keep increasing, im finally getting a new tap fitted on Wed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i cant believe it either!

 

2 plumbers have confirmed its the tap - so i need them to give me a report. tp pass to B&Q.

 

Water must have gone into the electrics, hence the lights went off. electrican came out and fixed it, then the next day it starting triping, so he had to come out again and said there was still water in the electrics..

 

so far i have been charged for 2 plumbers, electricans and the management comany have charged me for the inconvenince it has caused them - liasing with the contractors. they would not let me deal with it!!!

 

thats why its been stressful, the bills keep increasing, im finally getting a new tap fitted on Wed!

 

It's of no use saying "water must have gone into the electics", you would have to prove it did and that it came from your tap.

 

What happened exactly, did the sink overflow??

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont know where it leaked from, but my sis also has home emergency cover , so she called someone out who confirmed the tap was faulty, he turned the water off. the plumber later came and confirmed the same thing. Thats 2 independant reports!

The plumber was the contractor from the management company

 

yes the electrican has confirmed it was due to a leak from my flat

im refusing to pay subsequent bills now as i think the management company are taking the mick and keep throwing all the bills my way which i am refusing to pay now. They wont give me the telepphone numbr for the electrican to talk to him

 

but the new tap is being fixed today, so that shoudl be the end of it...abut £500 later!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont know where it leaked from, but my sis also has home emergency cover , so she called someone out who confirmed the tap was faulty, he turned the water off. the plumber later came and confirmed the same thing. Thats 2 independant reports!

The plumber was the contractor from the management company

 

yes the electrican has confirmed it was due to a leak from my flat

im refusing to pay subsequent bills now as i think the management company are taking the mick and keep throwing all the bills my way which i am refusing to pay now. They wont give me the telepphone numbr for the electrican to talk to him

 

but the new tap is being fixed today, so that shoudl be the end of it...abut £500 later!

 

Seems like you have disputes other than B & Q. How is a management company involved ?

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

muncho. If we are to help you with your claim against B & Q, we need more information. Start with the tap.It was reported as faulty.What EXACTLY was the fault. This is a question B&Q will be asking. Did a plumber fit it originally - if so have you contacted him for his opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have just spoken to the plumber and he tells me that glan inside the tap has gone (the tap is only 2 months old), so the quality is poor.

 

he also confirmed that the water has gone through the floor boards hence the electrics going off the in the communual areas

 

The management company are invloved as the residents complained about the lights etc and they are dealing with the electrican and plumber. So they have charged me £52 for the inconvenience it has caused them. i ahve tried arguing it, but the directors have made a decsion that they are going to charge and we cannot claim through buildings insurance as the premium ill go up next year and its not fair on the other residents...i thought that what insurance was for, especially now that we now the leak was due to a fault

 

Does this help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your not answering the question muncho - how did the water get on the floor, did it run over the edge of the sink ie; did the sink overflow because the tap was leaking????

 

Also, you cannot be charged for 'inconvenience', only for the cost of putting it right.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry!! i ahve not spoken to the electrican to find out, but the sink didnot overflow as then we would have known there was a leak. so im guessing it was more internal (in the sink unit) and went inot the floor boards

 

Management compnny wont give me the tel number for electrican, but i spoke to them and she said he will give me an invoice stating what the problem was and confirming it came from the flat..

 

ill try and speak to the electrican again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - the sink didn't overflow, which means the tap did shut off properly. That means that any fault will have been in the joint connecting the tap to the supply.

 

This is where the difficulty comes in, 'who connected the water pipe to the tap'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A modern tap usually has an 'O' ring or ceramic disc as gland packing. See here for details

DIY Help & Advice : Taps Washers Supataps Glands : Plumbing : DIY How To

 

When gland packing is faulty this means that when the tap is turned off water still drips out of the spout.

 

The only way water can leak out of a tap and onto the floorboards is if the connections to the water pipe are faulty, or there is a crack in the metal of the tap.

If it were a faulty gland, you would see the water dripping out of the body of the tap near the handle.The water would then run into the sink.

 

It might help if you could say which B&Q tap it was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not saying the tap is not faulty, but I can't see how any water can get out of the tap if the pipe is connected properly and using ptfe tape unless there is physical damage to the body of the tap. I cannot see where gland failure will cause water to come from where the pipe connects to the tap unless it is as I said 'damaged'.

 

Gland failure would mean the water was leaking into the sink from the top of the tap or from it's spout.

 

Keep the tap safe as B&Q will want it returned for an examination and report. They will not in any way consider any further action without it's return.

Link to post
Share on other sites

another question regarding the electrican:

he came once the lights went out and fixed the problem. the next day the lights went off again, s he came out again and said there was a problem that he did not detect. the plumber has now confirmed the leak was not present the 2nd time he came to the property.

So how can he charge me another call out charge to tell methere was still a problem and once the plumber has fixed the tap, the electrican is going to come out again to fix the lights and charge me again!

 

shoudnt he have picked this up the 1st time? he says he couldnt, i cant prove it beacuse the management agent wouldnt allow me to send someone to give me a quote

does that make sense/

 

the whole thing is a nightmare

Link to post
Share on other sites

another question regarding the electrican:

he came once the lights went out and fixed the problem. the next day the lights went off again, s he came out again and said there was a problem that he did not detect. the plumber has now confirmed the leak was not present the 2nd time he came to the property.

So how can he charge me another call out charge to tell methere was still a problem and once the plumber has fixed the tap, the electrican is going to come out again to fix the lights and charge me again!

 

shoudnt he have picked this up the 1st time? he says he couldnt, i cant prove it beacuse the management agent wouldnt allow me to send someone to give me a quote

does that make sense/

 

the whole thing is a nightmare

 

I think you have too many questions on here, it started off on taps then management companies and now electricians, it prob needs to be broken down into seperate questions.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I know what may have happened. Many mixer taps come with copper tails. The narrow end screws into the base of the tap with an O ring to seal, the other end is 25 mm dia to fit a standard water pipe.

 

It seems that this O ring may have been faulty, causing leaking from the base of the tap, which would normally be out of sight below the sink.

 

If this is the case the O.P should contact B&Q with this information and listing the consequential damage, and see what their reaction is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...