Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent Help & Advise Required, apparent Gross Misconduct.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello guys, I need some advice here with this situation.

I have been working with my current employer for the past 5 years, with a fantastic record and have been a top employee on many occasions even securing a place on a college course which the company has paid for.

However, I arrived in work on Friday as usual, 9pm prompt, I go into my department and within 30mins I have a phone call asking me to come to HR.

I goes to the HR room, where the HR officer and my line manager are waiting, they take me to the meeting room, and tell me there has been something “crop up” unexpectedly, where SOMETHING I have done is not in line with the data they have been given. I asked if they could clarify, but they said they couldn’t tell me what I am being accused of until an Investigation has been carried out.

They had a folder on the desk with some documentation in it, but I asked to see it, and they told me I wasn’t allowed until they had investigated again. They told me I was currently now under suspension and will be getting full pay. They will be in contact with me when the investigation is complete. I asked a few more questions about what they are on about and who has said what and what the alleged allegation is. They still have not told me.

I was escorted off site, and told not to contact anybody at work. I would also be expecting a letter through 1st class post the next day (Saturday), Which I received.

The letter states and I quote;

“Following our meeting of 19th June 2009, I am writing to confirm that, as of the date of the meeting, you have been suspended from work until further notice pending into an allegation of gross misconduct. We reserve the right to change or add to these allegations in the light of our investigation.

Your suspension does not constitute disciplinary action and does not imply any assumption that you are guilty of any misconduct. We will keep the matter under review and will aim to make the period of suspension no longer than necessary. During your suspension, we shall continue to pay your salary in the same way.

You will continue to be employed by us throughout your suspension and you remain bound by your terms and condition of employment. You are required to co-operate in our investigations and may be required to attend the workplace for investigative interviews or disciplinary hearings. However, you are not otherwise required to carry out any of your duties and you should not attend the workplace unless authorised by a member of HR. You must not communicate with any of our employees, contractors or customers unless authorised. However, you are required to be available to answer any work related queries.

Please read and ensure you understand our Disciplinary procedure, [Contained in the staff handbook]. When we have carried out our investigation, we shall write to you to inform you whether we intend to hold a disciplinary hearing. If we consider that there are grounds for disciplinary action we shall inform you of those grounds in writing and you will have the opportunity to state your case at the hearing, in accordance with the disciplinary procedure.

If you know of any documents, witnesses or information that you think will be relevant to the matters under investigation, please let me know as soon as possible.

If you have any queries about this matter or the terms of your suspension, feel free to contact us.

Yours Sincerely”

XXXXXXXXX

I still have no clue what to do, what I am supposed to have done, and I am unsure of what to do next. What documentation?..What does this sound like to you guys? I feel and believe I am being stitched up, but until I know what I am being accused of, I cannot say anything more until then.. can someone please shed some light on this for me please, I have never been in this situation before and I do not want to lose my job and my career as a professional.

I would finally like to mention I did receive a phone call on the Friday stating that I would more than likely be expected in for a meeting on the Friday of next week. I also would like to point out that the college course I have been put through is a 2-year course, and has 2 weeks left until I qualify, I go into college on a Thursday, so the day before this meeting. Should I be worried about not getting qualified, as I earned the right for this, and have completed all my assignments for handing in this Thursday?

Thanks in Advance.

Shadow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing I would do is contact ACAS in the morning to find out how much of a reason they need to give you for a suspension. I don't know, to be honest, whether saying it's gross misconduct is enough to count as the reason. And it seems a bit unfair to say, 'If you know of any documents, witnesses or information that you think will be relevant to the matters under investigation, please let me know as soon as possible' when you haven't been given any specific information what it's about.

 

That's the only thing I could potentially see a problem with (although I'm no employment expert by any means so please do check everything with an organisation like ACAS). Everything else looks to be by the book, and the letter goes a long way to stress that you will still be paid and there's no question of guilt at this stage.

 

If they haven't made any reference to your college situation then of course contact them to check. If there are no other employees from the same firm that attend the course I can't see any reason why they shouldn't let you complete it. Afterall it would be 2 years education that they paid for out the window!

 

Hope everything works out ok. Can't imagine how stressful it must be, especially when you're in the dark over what it's about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This

You must not communicate with any of our employees, contractors or customers unless authorised.
is unlawful and unenforceable.

 

Whilst they can enforce non-communication during working hours, they have no rights over employees' own time. How would this work if you had a relative working there? The HRA allows freedom of association and your employer cannot over-rule that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi I've just come across your thread,and must say now I'm no expert in HR issues, the advice given about contacting ACAS is valid, were they of any help, and are you in a union.

My usual suggestion in these circumstances is to send a PM with a link to your thread to forum contributers with HR expertise such as elche, ell-enn, or sidewinder asking if they can offer any advice.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you know of any documents, witnesses or information that you think will be relevant to the matters under investigation, please let me know as soon as possible.

Er.........No.

On suspension you should have been told why.You should immeadiatly answer the letter with a request for an answer "why have I been suspended"

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is unlawful and unenforceable.

 

Whilst they can enforce non-communication during working hours, they have no rights over employees' own time. How would this work if you had a relative working there? The HRA allows freedom of association and your employer cannot over-rule that.

 

Do you have any other information on this and or case law as I was told exactly the same by my employer in a letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to say but in todays climate you are guilty till proven innocent.

 

When forces move against you in a place of work they move against you.

 

You are on your way out my friend as a similar thing happenned to my friend.

 

All an employer has to do is form a reasonable belief ....and that is very easy to do when they want you out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...