Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, thanks, I won't wait for them. On a side note, some of the posts on here are a bit frustrating, I read through five pages or so of someone going through the court process rooting for them as I'm reading, then nothing, not heard of again. Left here wondering what the outcome was, lol!
    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because there was still £69 owing, I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle. However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account ......... has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rizel23 vs M&S


rizel23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Rizel23 vs M&S

 

Well M&S have replied today requesting my signature, what a surprise, i have attached there letter, can anyone please advise on my next steps and letter to reply with, all i want is a true copy of my agreement!

m&S.jpg

m&S 001.jpg

Edited by rizel23
seperate threads
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

could i modify this that cerberusalert posted on another thread?

 

Dear Sir,

 

You have stipulated that you require proof of my identity/signature before you comply with my Subject Access Request, may I bring the following to your attention;

 

Data Protection Act Good Practice Notes:

 

2. Do you have enough information to be sure of the requester’s identity?

Often you will have no reason to doubt a person’s identity. For example, if a person with whom you have regular contact sends a letter from their known address it may be safe to assume that they are who they say they are.

 

Suffice to say that if the Information Commissioners Office are satisfied that if you have previously corresponded with me at this address then it is reasonable that I am the person I say I am, therefore there is no leglislation nor guidelines that you can hide behind in an attempt to avoid fullfilling my legal request,

 

Yours,

Print name do not sign.

Page not found

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...1&d=1242456802

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rizel, I thought you had only requested a CCA, not a SAR. If this was the case, send this letter http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/572-debt-letter-when-company-refuse-cca-due-to-no-signature-. They only have 12 + 2 days to comply.

If you did request a SAR, I believe they can request your signature; there are 2 responses to this, either say you have been communicating with this address blah blah blah, or send a modified signature that you know you have never used or with lines though etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks cymruambyth, its all very new to me this and trying to learn as i go, didn't expect that letter from M&S.

 

Anyhow, just to confirm i have NOT sent a SAR yet, i just saw you posted that letter template on another thread and thought i could modifiy it for my CCA request.

 

Thanks again for posting correct letter, i shall post first thing recorded tomorrow!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

well i sent M&S this on the 12th June;

 

Thank you for your letter dated 09/06/2009 in which you say that you will not comply with my request dated 02/06/09 under s.78(1) of the `Consumer Credit Act 1974 unless I provide you with a signature.

 

There is no requirement under the Act that require a s.78(1) request to be accompanied by a signature, and I am unable to accede to your request.

 

Further, I note that you have sent statements and correspondence containing sensitive private information to me at same address as that detailed in my s.78(1) request. If you are concerned that you are corresponding with the correct person I wonder why you have not verified the information before.

 

As you are aware, disclosing data without adequate checks of identity is contrary to the 7th principal of data protection, listed in schedule 1 of the Data protection Act 1998.

 

My request for a true copy of my credit agreement under section 78(1) was made on 02/06/2009 and the 12 working days for your compliance expire on 18/06/2009. I note that there is no provision that removes the requirements of the act to provide this information on time, even if you are unsure of my identity.

 

Please now comply with your legal obligation without further delay.

 

Regards

 

 

then after the 12 + 2 days from originally requesting CCA sent a letter in dispute ect.

 

They have now replied with this,

 

http://i40.tinypic.com/29mpykn.jpg

 

should i just sign it and send it back? thanks

 

(p.s sent recorded delivery from them as well)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the idiots this;

 

Dear Sir,

 

You have stipulated that you require proof of my identity/signature before you comply with my CCA request, may I bring the following to your attention;

Data Protection Act Good Practice Notes:

 

2. Do you have enough information to be sure of the requester’s identity?

Often you will have no reason to doubt a person’s identity. For example, if a person with whom you have regular contact sends a letter from their known address it may be safe to assume that they are who they say they are.

 

Suffice to say that if the Information Commissioners Office are satisfied that if you have previously corresponded with me at this address then it is reasonable that I am the person I say I am, therefore there is no leglislation nor guidelines that you can hide behind in an attempt to avoid fullfilling my legal request.

 

If you still fail to comply to my legal request, I will have no other option than to complain to the Information Commissioners Office & if my complaint is upheld you will be liable to a £5000 fine.

 

Yours,

Print name do not sign.

http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/checklist_for_handling_requests_for_personal_information.pdf

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=8861&d=1242456802

 

If they still fail to provide it make a complaint to the ICO https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us.aspx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks, it will go tomorrow, the lengths these credit company's go to to not issue simply paper work is getting beyond me, Barclays have just sent me T&Cs for the third time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK M&S responded today;

 

 

 

so is what there saying that they will not send any data relating to my (alleged) account until they have my signature? Will make sending statements bit tricky won't it? Surely they can not make any charges to the account and not inform me, to which they are now saying they won't do till they have a copy of my signature?

 

Can anyone please advise on next step? Complaint to ICO i presume, should i send them a copt all all correspondence to them? do i need to sign my letter to the ICO? thanks

Edited by rizel23
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have decided to post everything off so they have copies of everything, this is letter i have included, is it OK?

 

Dear Sir\Madame,

 

 

Complaint Against Marks & Spencers &More Credit Card

On the 2nd June 2009 I requested a true copy of the alleged Credit Agreement between myself and Marks & Spencer &More Credit Card. I feel I have followed the correct procedure in doing so. They are currently refusing to comply with my request and doubting my identity, for which I feel no valid reason for them to do so.

This company has been communicating with myself since 2006 at the same address and would therefore, I feel, have no reason to question my identity when requesting such documents. I’m also unaware of any legislation that requires a signature to release a CCA.

My reason for requesting such document is that I have reason to believe that there may be discrepancies within the agreement which may leave it improperly executed. I also took the liberty of pointing out the ICO’s position on Data Protection Act Good Practice Notes in my final letter dated 2nd July 2009.

I have included all correspondence between myself and Marks & Spencer’s. I look forward to your reply in due time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

well a lovely chap at M&S has sent me a letter today, ignoring there 2+ calls a day must be getting on there nerves ;-)

 

http://i26.tinypic.com/zx016o.jpg

 

i have drafted this reply, can anyone please check its OK and nothing wrong i have mentioned? cheers all you lovely folk!

 

 

Marks & Spencer Money

Kings Meadow

Chester

CH99 9FB

 

Dear David,Re:− Account/Reference Number:

 

I take note of your letter dated 25th July 2009.

 

I would strongly advise you to contact your customer services team. The above account is in dispute and awaiting clarification of an outcome from the ICO from my letter of complaint of Marks & Spencer’s lack of compliance with a Credit Card Agreement Request under Consumer Credit Act 1974 s77/8 (copy of the letter of acknowledgement of complaint enclosed)

 

Further more you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take any

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute

 

The lack of providing me with an original signed copy of the credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

If the above continues while the account is in dispute I reserve the right to register additional complaints with the appropriate governing bodies.

 

I have also made clear in previous correspondence that all communication needs to be in writing only, this has not been the case with daily phone calls and I’m in view that this constitutes as harassment. Please find enclosed letter advising that further harassment via phone calls will be taken seriously from this date.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

well after 4 letters kindly adving me my account is over due M&S have replied to the above letter i sent on 25th July with this:

 

http://i31.tinypic.com/ka4syb.jpg

 

if they are so sure that its Legally Enforceable i have zero idea why they are kicking up such a fuss about sending me a copy of it, to date which they still say they will not do unless i give them a copy of my signature 'for security' strange how they don't mind continuing to send highly detailed account information to me without a a copy of my signature!

 

Should i even reply? Still waiting to hear back from ICO

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Well after many months of them saying required signature they finally agreed it was not a legal requirement and sent this application form;

 

http://i36.tinypic.com/281dfkk.jpg

 

http://i35.tinypic.com/2gslhfr.jpg

 

I think its invalid as it does not state a credit limit? Any help much welcomed, thanks, Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...