Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi again all, below is another email they sent me, I just don't want to get in trouble or things to get worse with this crowd but I am taking your advice here. Anyway advice would be appreciated.   I am contacting you again after having tried to contact you both by email on 03/04/2024 and 10/04/2024, and by telephone on 10/04/2024 and 17/04/2024 to discuss the matter in relation to the regularization of the SOLIDWORKS case against xxx our company.   This is an urgent legal matter. Please contact me at your earliest convenience - +44 2921 920 296.    If we do not recieve a response before 24/04/2024, we will assume that you are not willing to settle this dispute amicably. The case will then be referred back to our client with whom, ultimately, the final decision lies on the enforcement of their intellectual property rights.    Yours sincerel y, Rhys
    • If you do get a letter of Claim and or Pre Action Protocol pack 15. Where there has been non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction, the court may order that (a) the parties are relieved of the obligation to comply or further comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (b) the proceedings are stayed while particular steps are taken to comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (c) sanctions are to be applied. 16. The court will consider the effect of any non-compliance when deciding whether to impose any sanctions which may include— (a) an order that the party at fault pays the costs of the proceedings, or part of the costs of the other party or parties; (b) an order that the party at fault pay those costs on an indemnity basis; (c) if the party at fault is a claimant who has been awarded a sum of money, an order depriving that party of interest on that sum for a specified period, and/or awarding interest at a lower rate than would otherwise have been awarded; (d) if the party at fault is a defendant, and the claimant has been awarded a sum of money, an order awarding interest on that sum for a specified period at a higher rate, (not exceeding 10% above base rate), than the rate which would otherwise have been awarded. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct   .
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rizel23 Vs Barclaycard


rizel23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4258 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Rizel23 Vs Barclaycard

 

Seems there on the ball at Barclays, only posted off to them Thursday!

 

Can anyone please advise on letter to post next so i can get in post first thing Monday? thanks

 

Heres what they replied with:

 

http://i41.tinypic.com/np2t1w.jpg

http://i43.tinypic.com/o5qj4o.jpg

http://i44.tinypic.com/a5kkt1.jpg

http://i41.tinypic.com/18naqf.jpg

http://i44.tinypic.com/r0tvn4.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/8xllkw.jpg

http://i44.tinypic.com/15xmtg4.jpg

Edited by rizel23
sperate threds needed
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Have I missed something no T&Cs 6 to 13?

 

DG:)

 

Ok I see it now.

Edited by diamondgirl
added to

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rizel23 Vs Barclaycard

 

Have I missed something, or have they failed to send you a copy of the actual agreement that you allegedly signed?

 

that is what i requested, from the letter DG posted, but they seem to have just sent t&cs that o presume could you pick up from any application form for a credit card and could relate to anyone!

 

What sort of letter should i send them now? Thanks

 

P.S Sorry for large images, i thought i was being good making sure they where big enough but there massive!

Edited by rizel23
seperate threads
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi this is a letter I was advised to send when I received an application form and current t&cs. You could adapt it to suit.

Thank you for your letter of XXXX, the contents of which have been noted.

You have failed to respond to my legal request under section 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

I note that you have replied to the above by sending a copy of an application form and Monument’s current Terms and Conditions. I must inform you that this is not sufficient to comply with the request and that your company is still in default under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

To clarify, just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement.

 

This breach of the agreement can be demonstrated as follows:

Section 180(1) (b) authorises, “the omission from a copy of certain material from the original, or the inclusion of certain material in condensed form.” This refers to statutory instruments made under the heading Copies of document regulations and in this care in particular to SI 1983/1557.

Before leaving section 180 there are two other sections that should be remembered these are:

 

Section 2(2) (a) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not satisfied unless the copy supplied is in the prescribed form and conforms to the prescribed requirements;

And more importantly:

 

Section 2(b) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not infringed by the omission of any material, or its inclusion in condensed form, if that is authorised by regulations.

You will see that this quite clearly states that whilst certain items may be left out of the copy document, the rest of the document must be in the form and contain all items as prescribed by the regulations.

 

Turning to the regulations regarding what may be omitted from these copies these are contained with SI 1983/1557.

 

The regulations state:

(2) There may be omitted from any such copy-

(a) any information included in an executed agreement, security instrument or other document relating to the debtor, hirer or surety or included for the use of the creditor or owner only which is not required to be included therein by the Act or any Regulations there under as to the form and content of the document of which it is a copy;

(b) any signature box, signature or date of signature (other than, in the case of a copy of a cancellable executed agreement delivered to the debtor under section 63(1) of the Act, the date of signature by the debtor of an agreement to which section 68(b) of the Act applies);

 

It is quite clear what can be omitted from the copy document, this again asserts that all other details of the agreement should presented in form and content as required by the regulations.

 

The requirements of the Agreement regulations 1983/1553 are very explicit in describing the form and content of an agreement and this as I have demonstrated also applies to the copy of any such agreement with the above mentioned proviso.

 

Nowhere within these regulations does it state that part of the agreement can be presented on a separate document headed terms and conditions.

It does state that all terms and conditions should be within the agreement document and is explicit of the form in which it is presented.

 

I hope this explains why your reply was unacceptable I await a True copy of my agreement and would remind you again that whilst the request has not been complied with the default continues

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rizel23 Vs Barclaycard

 

Barclaycard still won't send me a a true copy, just this letter and another photocopy of some T&C's.

 

Can anyone please advise on what to send next, this is what they sent me today, are they just talking rubbish to delay me?

 

 

http://i43.tinypic.com/243namr.jpg

 

http://i41.tinypic.com/2i6k92.jpg

 

http://i44.tinypic.com/b6o6ko.jpg

Edited by rizel23
seperate threads
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rizel23 vs Barclaycard

 

should i just send a SAR now? I'm pretty confused as to why they kick up such a fuss about not sending what documents i requested!

Edited by rizel23
Link to post
Share on other sites

should i just send a SAR now? I'm pretty confused as to why they kick up such a fuss about not sending what documents i requested!

 

Some cynics would say they are trying to confuse because they don't have the document!!:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I am now only guessing as to the corect answer! If you do send a SAR then they are obliged to send all the information that thyey hold on you. This will also give you details of any illegal charges and dates that documents have been sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, Barclays are not playing ball, so to hopfully get to the end of this should i send this letter:

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca

 

i shall amend slightly to show my disprovement at them for not replying with relevent information i requested, would that be OK?

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, Barclays are not playing ball, so to hopfully get to the end of this should i send this letter:

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca

 

i shall amend slightly to show my disprovement at them for not replying with relevent information i requested, would that be OK?

 

personally rizel- i would not send a SAR at this stage - it wil cost you a tenn er and you might need to do one at a later stage for more updated information

 

did you send both the other letters recorded?

 

if so send one more (recorded) short and sweet

 

dear sirs

 

thank you for your letter of XXXXXX i note that you still fail to comply with your obligations under s78 of the consumer credit act and that you remain in default

 

I will not answer any further correspondence until such time as you comply

 

Y F

 

 

you really do not need to keep responding and asking for the same thing

 

if you get a letter from a dca or solicitor then semply send the bemused letter

 

don't talk to them on the phone (get yourself a TRUECALL if calls become a nuisance)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply diddydicky, every thing has gone recorded yes.

 

I'm a bit concerned though as they say in their last letter they have complied to my request? If i do send a SAR then at least i would get to the bottom of if they do have a CCA on this account, it could be that they simply can't be arsed to find it and send out standard replies? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply diddydicky, every thing has gone recorded yes.

 

I'm a bit concerned though as they say in their last letter they have complied to my request? If i do send a SAR then at least i would get to the bottom of if they do have a CCA on this account, it could be that they simply can't be arsed to find it and send out standard replies? thanks

 

the whole thing with s78 compliance is a grey area with the creditors interpreting what constitutes compliance with a lilly livered OFT sitting on the fence

 

in a nutshell you are seeking to establish exactly WHAT contract you entered into with the creditor

 

 

this means that the documents received must be easily legible and must refer to YOU (anyone can send a blank set of t & C's)

 

the LATEST terms and conditions are of no use if they creditor cannot also show you a copy of the original agreement containing a term where you agreed to say that they could change the T & C's

 

the orginal agreement you signed must contain the prescribed terms within its four corners

 

anything (alleged to have been) on the back of the signature sheet or other pages must be shown on that original sheet to be part of the same document.

 

Now then IF you are sure (as a right thinking person) that they have not supplied what they are supposed to- you simply stick to your guns (just as they do) and say that have NOT complied

 

you only need counter their arguments a couple of times and ignore them if they keep repeating the same drivel over and over

 

its a battle of wills!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks diddydicky, that's exactly how i'm, thinking yes. Sending some photocopied T&Cs is of no use to me if i believe the originally credit agreement was floored.

 

Letters going off tomorrow, still going to send a SAR and make a complaint to OFA to cover my back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks diddydicky, that's exactly how i'm, thinking yes. Sending some photocopied T&Cs is of no use to me if i believe the originally credit agreement was floored.

 

Letters going off tomorrow, still going to send a SAR and make a complaint to OFA to cover my back.

 

well it's up to you but it is 99.9% certain that the SAR will not get the agreement from barclays and you will have wasted 10 quid and also wet some of your powder!

 

better to wait until DN's and TN's have (or have not as the case may be) before using your sar request IMO

Link to post
Share on other sites

haveing read some other post seems SAR could well be a waste of money, but will also give me chance to see any charges they have applied and if taken further, would aid towards defense that i did everything in my power to get a CCA off them.

 

What would be the benefit of waiting to send off a SAR untill DNs & TN's get involved? Balance is only £800 & i would mybeable able to come to a settlement if they could not produce a CCA and were honest about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

haveing read some other post seems SAR could well be a waste of money, but will also give me chance to see any charges they have applied and if taken further, would aid towards defense that i did everything in my power to get a CCA off them.

 

What would be the benefit of waiting to send off a SAR untill DNs & TN's get involved? Balance is only £800 & i would mybeable able to come to a settlement if they could not produce a CCA and were honest about it.

 

well as i said personally i would wait - there is no urgency for the information at the moment

 

as you are so close in monetary terms i would send a payment to reduce the O/s balance to 749 before you receive the cca back

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the date to receive back CCA of 12+2 days is tomorrow, so i was going to stop all payments, is there a specific reason why i should lower the balance to £749? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the date to receive back CCA of 12+2 days is tomorrow, so i was going to stop all payments, is there a specific reason why i should lower the balance to £749? thanks

 

yes- its a very long outside chance but some DCA's like to use statutory demands to put the frighteners on people

 

cant do it for a debt under 750

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...