Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Resolution Services - Help needed!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all!

 

First time poster here so forgive if i appear a bit dim about this whole situation.

 

Basically, i have today received a letter from CRS demanding i pay £123 to them, £60 being their standard charge.

 

The story is basically i was a member of Gym and Trim. I paid £33 a month on a 3 month contract starting in March 2008. Come the end of March 2009 I had lost interest, so subsequently sent a cancellation letter and cancelled direct debits.

 

Gym and Trim then sent a letter stating i needed to give 30 days notice. There was only one further letter before they passed my details to CRS.

 

Somehow though CRS are stating my debt is £63, is this a typo surely?

 

I admit i was foolish in not replying though it's hardly been a great couple of months with a couple of family deaths taking priority. I am prepared to pay the £33, however i do not want to pay this standard charge, is there any help i can get on this?

 

Thanks in advance,

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that this was a 3 month contract in March 2008, was it the type of self renewing 3 monthly contract after that date? It would depend on the small print in the contract, as to whether a 30 days notice for termination is correct.

 

My only suggestion would be to write to the Original Creditor and offer the £33 in full and final settlement. Make sure that you get their agreement in writing before you pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much notice did you give them, have a look at section 8.1, I used it against virgin and arc credit services, haven't heard from them since.

 

If you search the forum you won't find anyone who as been to court by a gym, their contracts generaly are in breach of utccr

 

cds:)

utccr 8.1 gym membership.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

They take a payment 1st of every month, the direct debit was cancelled on 18th March and letter sent on 21st. I am writing a letter anyway to argue that £63 is not my debt, £33 is the initial amount. I am not clued up on the legal side but i know one thing for certain is that it to randomly add £30 is illegal.

 

Shall i offer to pay the £33 only or dispute all charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They take a payment 1st of every month, the direct debit was cancelled on 18th March and letter sent on 21st.

 

If the DD is taken from the first of the month and you sent the formal request in writing on the 21st? Then the 30 days notice would be taken from then, so yeah your right, all the gym would need is £33, however, having only just signed a new 12 month contract with my local gym today, I did take an interest in who the signed agreement is with, and it comes under the CCA 1974. My obligations to pay don't lie with the gym, I sign up to the gym, they get paid in full by another 'bank' for the years membership, I am then in debt to this other credit organisation, should i cancel my contract early!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Ok guys, thanks for the help so far! I have recently received a response from the shysters at CRS, allegedly Gym & Trim have added £30 admin fee on top for sending 3 letters, which is scandalous!

 

And they claim their £60 fee is standard recovery and is not broken down in anyway.

 

They have agreed to cut the debt down to £100 if I pay in the next 10 days, however i am still refusing to do this, no way can 3 shoddy template letters justify an admin fee!

 

Any further advice? Is it best I speak to a solicitor or what not?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

So is it just £33 for a months membership that they were originally crying about?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep £33, which they have now somehow inflated to £123!

Well I know exactly what I would do, pay the gym the £33 get a receipt and tell Mickey Mouse CRS to take you to court for their charges:D

 

Firstly, they won't, secondly, they won't, and thirdly, they won't!

 

A DCA is not allowed to levie charges unfairly for debt collection

The Office of Fair Trading: Debt collection practices

 

Charging for debt collection

2.9 Charges should not be levied unfairly.

2.10 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a. claiming collection costs from a debtor in the absence of express

contractual or other legal provision

b. misleading debtors into believing they are legally liable to pay

collection charges when this is not the case, for example, when there

is no contractual provision

c. not giving an indication in credit agreements of the amount of any

charges payable on default

d. applying unreasonable charges, for example, charges not based on actual

and necessary costs

e. applying charges which are disproportionate to the main debt.

 

So they can go whistle:D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...