Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I will put some money into the coffers on this site as its well deserved. 
    • Hi all,    I have read all the threads about CLI (Credit limits international) regarding fines from minor traffic offences in Florence Italy but I wonder if anyone actually faced some serious issues by ignoring the letters? Did any bailiffs knocking on the door, any court hearings, credit scores affected etc?   In my case, it is for a traffic offence in Florence and entering a traffic limited zone in 2015. CLI claims that their client is the Firenze Municipale and they are collecting the debt on their behalf. However, I have (as many others) never received the first or any notification from the Italian traffic police itself.  I called them and as stated in many online websites - they confirmed that the final notification is sent by registered post and needs to sent within 360 days of when they received my contact details by the rental company. The most odd thing is that the Firenze Municipale also mentioned that they hold no records of old fines so that makes me really wonder how they can act on behalf of the police when they don't have any records of it? Also worth mentioning is that, there are many errors on the original fine CLI has sent me, there are slightly different amount stated on each page.    If they have bought the debt than it would be fraud by claiming that they act on behalf of a client.   I know many are saying to ignore it and they have no authority to take further legal actions, however they are a member of CSA (note I have spoken to FCA and they confirmed they do not regulate traffic offences so they do not need to be registered there) so I would think they can enforce it.    Does anyone have any experience and how far did CLI take it? I have no problem paying the original fine as I never was notified but they are claiming more than 4 times and I doubt you can negotiate.    Thanks!    
    • Fined for exceeding the free parking period.   I can’t found the form the other posters have filled out with details of fine etc but it happened on the 3rd September issue date 7th September. I received the fine on the 16th September but this is delayed, I imagine, due to my car being a car hire so was alerted to it my.    Shopped at Lidl, have proof of shopping with my Apple Pay but not a physical receipt.    Looking back with Google maps there are signs saying customer parking but no obvious terms.   Having read some posts on here, I have written to the CEO, included proof of shopping etc and am waiting for their reply.    Feeling hopeful but also anxious I will end up having to deal with Athena and they seem like hideous people to deal with.    Any advice greatfully received.    Attached fine    Email I sent to CEO (havehad no confirmation that they have received the email) christian.haertnagel@lidl.co.uk (hope this is the current ceo) below.     Dear Christian,   I hope this finds you healthy and well in this unprecedented time.   I have recently moved to SE9 from NW3 and having been a religious online grocery shopper, spending large amounts with Ocado, please see attached document. Since moving to SE9, having recently bought a car, the current financial climate & having more options for our grocery shopping, we decided to start shopping at Lidl in Eltham having heard good things.  We have gone in there a few times now and, so far, we are pleased with the produce we come home with & the customer service experience. Also this branch has a lot of house hold goods, clothing, gardening and recently DIY equipment, lots to look through.   Our visit on the 3rd September, we must have taken longer than we realised. We were there with friends and they were doing a big shop, us not so big this time and afterwards we even signed up for Lidl Plus, please see attached document, so we were really pleased.   Today I was shocked to receive a, very un, Civil Parking Charge Notice for being in the car park 21 minutes over the the 90 minute free parking, please see notices attached below. We had no idea this free parking restriction even existed and there centrally wasn’t any adequate signage to alert us in our arrival.   Please find proof of our purchase attached, please note the time of the purchase 16.38 and the notice states we departed the car park at 16.42.   We trust that this will be addressed, so that your customers can park, at least, knowing what the parking terms are before they choose to park and shop in your store.   As valued & loyal customers this is unfair and we kindly ask that you tell Athena to cancel this charge.   Thank you for your time in addressing this matter.  
    • Uploaded revised defence for review/comment Link Kearn Defence Rev1.pdf
    • Anyway, about time it was said straight   The Governments' claimed 'Capacity figures aren't 'interpretations,' they are outright lies Capacity by definition is "the ability to receive or contain" - and its collapsing at little more than 80,000 a day at best. There may be 120,000ish 'tests' - but Governments own figures as stated quite clearly state 81,000 people tested a day (is that best, or average?)   So by definition and example (artificially holding back results to boost a single days figures aside) - 80,000ish a day would seem to be the actual true capacity of the UK's testing system to test people - even if certain parts of it MIGHT theoretically be capable of more  
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Phone calls from Lowell


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4109 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

This week, i have received 2 phone calls from a company called Lowell. I understand from reading posts/threads on this site that these guys are a big pain in a**e. I have no idea why they are ringing me, i've not actually answered their calls, though they have left messages. Can someone please give me advice what i should do/expect from these people?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone them just to see what they want. Done acknowledge the debt however or pay anything.

 

However, if its for £50 and afew pennies, it may be worth just paying. I would

 

But if any more, you can look to dispute further and just casually request a copy of your CCA. and see what turns up from there

Train hard...Fight easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I am sure you will have gathered from reading these posts do not talk to them on the phone. they will lie and bully threaten everything under the sun from taking you to court to killing your cat.Remember it is harder to think strait when they are bulling you over the phone which is exactly where the dca wants you.I would wait untill they send you a standard threat o gram to find out what they want when you have it you will get help from caggers on this site

Edited by dcakiller
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites
This week, i have received 2 phone calls from a company called Lowell. I understand from reading posts/threads on this site that these guys are a big pain in a**e. I have no idea why they are ringing me, i've not actually answered their calls, though they have left messages. Can someone please give me advice what i should do/expect from these people?

depends on what they want:rolleyes:

Thanks

 

they will continue to ring,leave messages,if you do answer refuse to go through security

and replace the phone.

 

wait till they send their first threat o gram,you will then know what its about.

 

and how to go about forcing them back under their rock:lol:

 

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER.

 

SO PROUD OF MY AVATAR,THAT TOOK ME WEEKS TO WORK OUT HOW TO GET ONE.:lol:

 

PLZ CLICK MY SCALES IF YOU LIKE WHAT I SAY.

OR IF I HAVE HELPED IN ANY WAY.:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

dcakill does have a point, myself i would call them just to generally see what they want, especially if im not aware of any reason why they are after me.

Train hard...Fight easy

Link to post
Share on other sites
dcakill does have a point, myself i would call them just to generally see what they want, especially if im not aware of any reason why they are after me.

 

By all means if you fell strong enough call them but tell them the call is being recorded and witnesed that normaly makes them behave. Ask them to put any alleged debt in wrighting. Even if you do owe a debt the banks & dca would not hesatate to use the law to get out of paying there own debts . It will not be the first debt I have seen being torn to shreads on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really want to talk to these kind of people because i know i'll end up losing my temper with them if they start trying to bully me. Can i just wait for a letter or should i really talk to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells are the lowest of the low, so if you call them tell them that th call is being recorded and see their reaction. I'd just wait for a letter and hit them with a CCA once the letter arrives, plus include the telephone harrassment letter for good measure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would personaly wait for there first threat o gram. I have had dca calling me I refused to speak to them over the phone when the did wright to me the debt was time barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can i tell when the debt time is barred? Could my debt have been sold on by Westcot? I used to have a bank acccout with the coop but that has been closed now for over a year!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatly it has to be six years (5 in scotland) since last payment or writen conformaton of the debt by you. But if the debt is for a bank account there may be charges ect ect that you can reclaim hence why you should not speek to them over the phone if you have every thing in wrighting in front of you you can plan your next move and if you know you will get wound up why upset youself and waste you time and money on a phone call

Edited by dcakiller
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok, well i don't think it has been that long. How many more phone calls will they make before they send out a letter? I would rather have it in writing what they want & what the debt maybe.... Also can you explain to me what a CCA is & is there also a template for a telephone harassment letter.

Sorry for all of the questions!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres afew templates on here somehwere, im not really sure where, im new myself.

 

a CCA is the comsumer credit agreemtn you would have signed, if you didnt sign it or they dont have one, there aint a enforcable debt for them to pursue

Train hard...Fight easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, i can't really remember if i did, because when i first applied to get the account i got a bonus one as i was under 18, then it got upgraded to cashminder. I did have a currant account but i NEVER had a card for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would just ignore the phone calls,if they want to contact you badly enough they will write.

 

I find it better to deal with these people in writing,you have time to read their letters in peace and compose your thoughts to reply in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Erm, i can't really remember if i did, because when i first applied to get the account i got a bonus one as i was under 18, then it got upgraded to cashminder. I did have a currant account but i NEVER had a card for it.

 

bank account is not covered by cca.

 

other ways of getting rid of these muppets though,wait to see what they come up with.

 

they will write.

 

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER.

 

SO PROUD OF MY AVATAR,THAT TOOK ME WEEKS TO WORK OUT HOW TO GET ONE.:lol:

 

PLZ CLICK MY SCALES IF YOU LIKE WHAT I SAY.

OR IF I HAVE HELPED IN ANY WAY.:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my advice.

 

Wait for them to write to you. Do not speak to them on the phone at all.

 

Once you receive a letter from Lowell, send them this:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no: XXXXXXXX

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to yourselves.

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment. This is formal request that you remove all telephone numbers relating to me from your database. You must conduct all correspondance in writing only.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

Yours faithfully

enclosed: Harrassment warning

Then await a reply from them. Also, enclose a harrassment warning letter:

 

- HARASSMENT WARNING -

WARNING; PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997;

WARNING; COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003. s127.

Telephone Number: IN RED

Re: Harassment by telephone

Dear Sir/Madam.

 

I am writing in relation to telephone calls that I have received from your organisation, which I deem to be personally harassing. I have verbally requested that these calls stop, but I am still receiving calls. I now require the telephone number listed above to be completely removed from your systems.

 

I am in the view that your continued telephone calls put you in breach of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

 

This is a private telephone line, operated on a contract with the intention of receiving and making personal phone calls, I have not authorised any other member of my family to receive calls from your organisation using this PRIVATE TELEPHONE LINE.

 

By using this telephone number without my permission you are interferring with my ability to use my own private property for the duration of any call.

It is my right to require that this telephone line, which is licenced solely to myself, is kept clear for my own personal calls.

It is consquently my view that you are commiting the tort of interference with contract insofar as for the duration of each call you make to me without my permission, you are interfering with my contractual right to receive and make personal calls on my private telephone line.

 

Continued interference with my contractual rights in this manner may result in legal action.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to the Office of Communications, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you may be liable for a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that all telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

Yours faithfully,

Be sure to send them by recorded delivery.

  • Haha 1

If I have been helpful in any way, please tip my scales :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for all of your advice, deathbycrayons thanks for the letters as well. Can the telephone harrassmen be used towards another company, as i also keep getting people phoning for a previous tenant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm going to heed everyones advice & ignore the calls from lowell & see what comes in the post. Will update you, when i receive any letters. Once again thanks for all your help :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE!!!!

Well today i have receieved a letter from Lowell Financial, who say they have been instructed to contact me by their client Lowell Portfolio Ltd. Surly this is the same company?? Do i need to send them a letter even though the letter i've receieved isn't aggressive?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...