Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
    • Thanks very much Bank. I've now done a lot of reading and have drafted my Letter of Claim as attached. I look forward to your comments. 16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Phone calls from Lowell


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This week, i have received 2 phone calls from a company called Lowell. I understand from reading posts/threads on this site that these guys are a big pain in a**e. I have no idea why they are ringing me, i've not actually answered their calls, though they have left messages. Can someone please give me advice what i should do/expect from these people?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone them just to see what they want. Done acknowledge the debt however or pay anything.

 

However, if its for £50 and afew pennies, it may be worth just paying. I would

 

But if any more, you can look to dispute further and just casually request a copy of your CCA. and see what turns up from there

Train hard...Fight easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I am sure you will have gathered from reading these posts do not talk to them on the phone. they will lie and bully threaten everything under the sun from taking you to court to killing your cat.Remember it is harder to think strait when they are bulling you over the phone which is exactly where the dca wants you.I would wait untill they send you a standard threat o gram to find out what they want when you have it you will get help from caggers on this site

Edited by dcakiller
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

This week, i have received 2 phone calls from a company called Lowell. I understand from reading posts/threads on this site that these guys are a big pain in a**e. I have no idea why they are ringing me, i've not actually answered their calls, though they have left messages. Can someone please give me advice what i should do/expect from these people?

depends on what they want:rolleyes:

Thanks

 

they will continue to ring,leave messages,if you do answer refuse to go through security

and replace the phone.

 

wait till they send their first threat o gram,you will then know what its about.

 

and how to go about forcing them back under their rock:lol:

 

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

Link to post
Share on other sites

dcakill does have a point, myself i would call them just to generally see what they want, especially if im not aware of any reason why they are after me.

 

By all means if you fell strong enough call them but tell them the call is being recorded and witnesed that normaly makes them behave. Ask them to put any alleged debt in wrighting. Even if you do owe a debt the banks & dca would not hesatate to use the law to get out of paying there own debts . It will not be the first debt I have seen being torn to shreads on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really want to talk to these kind of people because i know i'll end up losing my temper with them if they start trying to bully me. Can i just wait for a letter or should i really talk to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells are the lowest of the low, so if you call them tell them that th call is being recorded and see their reaction. I'd just wait for a letter and hit them with a CCA once the letter arrives, plus include the telephone harrassment letter for good measure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can i tell when the debt time is barred? Could my debt have been sold on by Westcot? I used to have a bank acccout with the coop but that has been closed now for over a year!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatly it has to be six years (5 in scotland) since last payment or writen conformaton of the debt by you. But if the debt is for a bank account there may be charges ect ect that you can reclaim hence why you should not speek to them over the phone if you have every thing in wrighting in front of you you can plan your next move and if you know you will get wound up why upset youself and waste you time and money on a phone call

Edited by dcakiller
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok, well i don't think it has been that long. How many more phone calls will they make before they send out a letter? I would rather have it in writing what they want & what the debt maybe.... Also can you explain to me what a CCA is & is there also a template for a telephone harassment letter.

Sorry for all of the questions!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres afew templates on here somehwere, im not really sure where, im new myself.

 

a CCA is the comsumer credit agreemtn you would have signed, if you didnt sign it or they dont have one, there aint a enforcable debt for them to pursue

Train hard...Fight easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, i can't really remember if i did, because when i first applied to get the account i got a bonus one as i was under 18, then it got upgraded to cashminder. I did have a currant account but i NEVER had a card for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, i can't really remember if i did, because when i first applied to get the account i got a bonus one as i was under 18, then it got upgraded to cashminder. I did have a currant account but i NEVER had a card for it.

 

bank account is not covered by cca.

 

other ways of getting rid of these muppets though,wait to see what they come up with.

 

they will write.

 

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my advice.

 

Wait for them to write to you. Do not speak to them on the phone at all.

 

Once you receive a letter from Lowell, send them this:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no: XXXXXXXX

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to yourselves.

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment. This is formal request that you remove all telephone numbers relating to me from your database. You must conduct all correspondance in writing only.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

Yours faithfully

enclosed: Harrassment warning

Then await a reply from them. Also, enclose a harrassment warning letter:

 

- HARASSMENT WARNING -

WARNING; PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997;

WARNING; COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003. s127.

Telephone Number: IN RED

Re: Harassment by telephone

Dear Sir/Madam.

 

I am writing in relation to telephone calls that I have received from your organisation, which I deem to be personally harassing. I have verbally requested that these calls stop, but I am still receiving calls. I now require the telephone number listed above to be completely removed from your systems.

 

I am in the view that your continued telephone calls put you in breach of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

 

This is a private telephone line, operated on a contract with the intention of receiving and making personal phone calls, I have not authorised any other member of my family to receive calls from your organisation using this PRIVATE TELEPHONE LINE.

 

By using this telephone number without my permission you are interferring with my ability to use my own private property for the duration of any call.

It is my right to require that this telephone line, which is licenced solely to myself, is kept clear for my own personal calls.

It is consquently my view that you are commiting the tort of interference with contract insofar as for the duration of each call you make to me without my permission, you are interfering with my contractual right to receive and make personal calls on my private telephone line.

 

Continued interference with my contractual rights in this manner may result in legal action.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to the Office of Communications, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you may be liable for a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that all telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

Yours faithfully,

Be sure to send them by recorded delivery.

  • Haha 1

If I have been helpful in any way, please tip my scales :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for all of your advice, deathbycrayons thanks for the letters as well. Can the telephone harrassmen be used towards another company, as i also keep getting people phoning for a previous tenant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE!!!!

Well today i have receieved a letter from Lowell Financial, who say they have been instructed to contact me by their client Lowell Portfolio Ltd. Surly this is the same company?? Do i need to send them a letter even though the letter i've receieved isn't aggressive?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...