Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I need advice please, Back in November 2018 we parked at The Southgate McDonald’s/Starbucks car park at Stansted before getting our flight.I parked at Starbucks to walk to McDonald’s. I have received letters over the years and have never acknowledged any of them . I now have a CCJ against me as I didn’t think that it was real so never answered My latest letter from dcbl is a notice of debt recovery unpaid county court judgment of £347.92.I know I should have completed the CCJ.Is there anything that I can do now or should I just pay it.Thank you bingoboy
    • Hi BankFodder, Stu007 This is correct BankFodder. Thanks for all the info Stu007, very interesting reading Regards
    • Seems as if Germany has their own version of Boris🤣   ”I know that some of you are impatient with my posts about German politics, and particularly my repeated pieces on our retarded Health Minister. I get that this can seem like inside baseball, and that all of you suffer under the very similar idiocies of your own Covid politicians. But, I just can’t help myself. Lauterbach is a special case, a truly monumental idiot who in his boundless incompetence and stupidity vastly exceeds his peers. It is my aim to make him the international symbol of pandemic derangement. I want pictures of this human incarnation of everything that is wrong with masking children and force-vaccinating millions printed next to future dictionary entries on Covidianism. We have seen the enemy, and it is this sad, stupid, Smeagol-looking loser, who thinks Eric Feigl-Ding is an authority and that clip-on bowties are fashionable.”     German Media Realise Their Health Minister is an International Laughingstock – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG The German media are waking up to the fact that their mask-loving Health Minister Karl Lauterbach is an international...
    • Guardian readers on here  trying to ignore this 🤣🤣🤣   “Was it my imagination, on Tuesday morning, that there were more than the usual number of possible Guardian readers looking down in the mouth? I don't think so. A few of them, with that hard-to-define but easy-to-recognise look of Guardianistas, appeared unusually pensive. Had some momentous event occurred that had made them question their prejudices? Later in the morning, I stumbled on a possible cause. There was an article prominently displayed in the Guardian print edition and on its website under the byline of the paper's Economics Editor, Larry Elliott. Its headline ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It isn't. That's why rejoining is just a pipe dream.'”   STEPHEN GLOVER: Why won't the Tories trumpet the successes of Brexit when even the economics editor of the Guardian hails its benefits? | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK STEPHEN GLOVER: The headline of Larry Elliott's Guardian article ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It...  
    • So I ask you –"when did you first have sight of this policy containing this exclusion?" And you answer – "when I brought the policy" And then I ask you – "what is the value of the damage your caravan has sustained" and you answer that it is probably a complete write-off    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

Phone calls from Lowell


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5285 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This week, i have received 2 phone calls from a company called Lowell. I understand from reading posts/threads on this site that these guys are a big pain in a**e. I have no idea why they are ringing me, i've not actually answered their calls, though they have left messages. Can someone please give me advice what i should do/expect from these people?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone them just to see what they want. Done acknowledge the debt however or pay anything.

 

However, if its for £50 and afew pennies, it may be worth just paying. I would

 

But if any more, you can look to dispute further and just casually request a copy of your CCA. and see what turns up from there

Train hard...Fight easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I am sure you will have gathered from reading these posts do not talk to them on the phone. they will lie and bully threaten everything under the sun from taking you to court to killing your cat.Remember it is harder to think strait when they are bulling you over the phone which is exactly where the dca wants you.I would wait untill they send you a standard threat o gram to find out what they want when you have it you will get help from caggers on this site

Edited by dcakiller
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

This week, i have received 2 phone calls from a company called Lowell. I understand from reading posts/threads on this site that these guys are a big pain in a**e. I have no idea why they are ringing me, i've not actually answered their calls, though they have left messages. Can someone please give me advice what i should do/expect from these people?

depends on what they want:rolleyes:

Thanks

 

they will continue to ring,leave messages,if you do answer refuse to go through security

and replace the phone.

 

wait till they send their first threat o gram,you will then know what its about.

 

and how to go about forcing them back under their rock:lol:

 

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER.

 

SO PROUD OF MY AVATAR,THAT TOOK ME WEEKS TO WORK OUT HOW TO GET ONE.:lol:

 

PLZ CLICK MY SCALES IF YOU LIKE WHAT I SAY.

OR IF I HAVE HELPED IN ANY WAY.:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

dcakill does have a point, myself i would call them just to generally see what they want, especially if im not aware of any reason why they are after me.

 

By all means if you fell strong enough call them but tell them the call is being recorded and witnesed that normaly makes them behave. Ask them to put any alleged debt in wrighting. Even if you do owe a debt the banks & dca would not hesatate to use the law to get out of paying there own debts . It will not be the first debt I have seen being torn to shreads on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really want to talk to these kind of people because i know i'll end up losing my temper with them if they start trying to bully me. Can i just wait for a letter or should i really talk to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells are the lowest of the low, so if you call them tell them that th call is being recorded and see their reaction. I'd just wait for a letter and hit them with a CCA once the letter arrives, plus include the telephone harrassment letter for good measure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can i tell when the debt time is barred? Could my debt have been sold on by Westcot? I used to have a bank acccout with the coop but that has been closed now for over a year!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatly it has to be six years (5 in scotland) since last payment or writen conformaton of the debt by you. But if the debt is for a bank account there may be charges ect ect that you can reclaim hence why you should not speek to them over the phone if you have every thing in wrighting in front of you you can plan your next move and if you know you will get wound up why upset youself and waste you time and money on a phone call

Edited by dcakiller
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok, well i don't think it has been that long. How many more phone calls will they make before they send out a letter? I would rather have it in writing what they want & what the debt maybe.... Also can you explain to me what a CCA is & is there also a template for a telephone harassment letter.

Sorry for all of the questions!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres afew templates on here somehwere, im not really sure where, im new myself.

 

a CCA is the comsumer credit agreemtn you would have signed, if you didnt sign it or they dont have one, there aint a enforcable debt for them to pursue

Train hard...Fight easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, i can't really remember if i did, because when i first applied to get the account i got a bonus one as i was under 18, then it got upgraded to cashminder. I did have a currant account but i NEVER had a card for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, i can't really remember if i did, because when i first applied to get the account i got a bonus one as i was under 18, then it got upgraded to cashminder. I did have a currant account but i NEVER had a card for it.

 

bank account is not covered by cca.

 

other ways of getting rid of these muppets though,wait to see what they come up with.

 

they will write.

 

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER.

 

SO PROUD OF MY AVATAR,THAT TOOK ME WEEKS TO WORK OUT HOW TO GET ONE.:lol:

 

PLZ CLICK MY SCALES IF YOU LIKE WHAT I SAY.

OR IF I HAVE HELPED IN ANY WAY.:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my advice.

 

Wait for them to write to you. Do not speak to them on the phone at all.

 

Once you receive a letter from Lowell, send them this:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no: XXXXXXXX

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to yourselves.

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment. This is formal request that you remove all telephone numbers relating to me from your database. You must conduct all correspondance in writing only.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

Yours faithfully

enclosed: Harrassment warning

Then await a reply from them. Also, enclose a harrassment warning letter:

 

- HARASSMENT WARNING -

WARNING; PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997;

WARNING; COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003. s127.

Telephone Number: IN RED

Re: Harassment by telephone

Dear Sir/Madam.

 

I am writing in relation to telephone calls that I have received from your organisation, which I deem to be personally harassing. I have verbally requested that these calls stop, but I am still receiving calls. I now require the telephone number listed above to be completely removed from your systems.

 

I am in the view that your continued telephone calls put you in breach of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

 

This is a private telephone line, operated on a contract with the intention of receiving and making personal phone calls, I have not authorised any other member of my family to receive calls from your organisation using this PRIVATE TELEPHONE LINE.

 

By using this telephone number without my permission you are interferring with my ability to use my own private property for the duration of any call.

It is my right to require that this telephone line, which is licenced solely to myself, is kept clear for my own personal calls.

It is consquently my view that you are commiting the tort of interference with contract insofar as for the duration of each call you make to me without my permission, you are interfering with my contractual right to receive and make personal calls on my private telephone line.

 

Continued interference with my contractual rights in this manner may result in legal action.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to the Office of Communications, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you may be liable for a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that all telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

Yours faithfully,

Be sure to send them by recorded delivery.

  • Haha 1

If I have been helpful in any way, please tip my scales :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for all of your advice, deathbycrayons thanks for the letters as well. Can the telephone harrassmen be used towards another company, as i also keep getting people phoning for a previous tenant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE!!!!

Well today i have receieved a letter from Lowell Financial, who say they have been instructed to contact me by their client Lowell Portfolio Ltd. Surly this is the same company?? Do i need to send them a letter even though the letter i've receieved isn't aggressive?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...