Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • The CMA’s latest monitoring report on road fuel shows that prices at the pump have risen since late January, accompanied by above average margins and spreads.View the full article
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent Help Needed Moorcroft/egg Cca


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody,i asked moorcroft for a cca after they refused a drop in monthly payments and after 12 working days and a further 36 calender days they sent me this

http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j172/richieboy1977/cca1.jpg

 

http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j172/richieboy1977/cca2.jpg

 

http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j172/richieboy1977/cca33.jpg

 

Ps im using a friends photobucket account!

 

The cca was on 2 sheets of paper and had nothing on the back

 

Is this enforcable? and i never agreed to payment protection either!!

 

Is it best to do a subject access request now and see what the debt consists of (i.e unfair charges etc) or did the law change regards them commiting an offence after 42 days?

 

Not sure what to do next

 

Help!!

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid (b) - (the offence) no longer applies (this was scrapped in the last Credit Act amendments)....as they have supplied the agreement they are no longer in default of your request. Did you see this ? - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/188093-egg-credit-agreements-what.html - Did you ever receive a default notice ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i just sent egg 2 claims for my loan and credit card ppi by recorded delivery (i was never asked if i wanted it) and for good measure sent the letter i uploaded to moorcroft as well(2nd post)

 

Im sure I received a default notice

 

If moorcroft have provided the correct cca do i arrange to pay what i can afford or ask egg (the original creditor) for a subject access request so i can see what the debt consists of.

Im concerned a large chunk is for late payments but question is do i have to keep up repayments until the subject access comes through as its in dispute?

 

Bit confused what to do

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok Update!

Today i got a letter off moorcroft acting like im a new debt!?

No mention of my previous letter just asking me to pay the full amount within 7 days or to ring or write to arrange a way to pay?

Im currently trying to reclaim missold ppi direct from egg but how do i respond to moorcroft?

Do i ask why ignored my letter saying they are in breach regards the cca request or go down subject access request route?

The letter is pre court division and they say they're agents of egg,so do egg provide the subject access request or them?

Help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...