Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

non-fault car accident - help plz!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5423 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was involved in a car accident back in january with a taxi driver, he was at the top of a school driveway not indicating where he was going, i was turning off the main road onto the school driveway. I started to pass his car with no problems and as i passed noticed he was fiddling with his mobile, I had gotten the whole of my bonnet past his vehicle when he manouvered and the back corner of his car scratched the remaining length of my vehicle. I parked up and went to get details, it was dark and no witnesses, I gave my details when he asked for them but he withheld most of his from me saying it was my fault, as i was on my own and felt intimidated i didn't argue and instead did not enter into conversation.

I went onto my night course (held on the site where the accident occured) and 2 people who were car sharing said they had seen him also at the top of the driveway fiddling with his phone and they passed his car with no problems - when i told this to the insurance company they said it was invalid information as they did not see the accident but i dont see how the info is irrelevant, it shows he was being neglegent and that there was space for a car to pass easily as i had begun to do prior to him manouvering.

I called the insurance company when i got home but they were closed for the night, i called again in the morning and reported the accident and gave the few details I had. Later that day i got called by an unknown number, when i answered a man was demanding my details, i asked who he was and he demanded my details again, i asked again who he was and he said he was a colleague of the third party, to which i told him my details were none of his business and that i had informed my insurance company, he told me "fine, do it your way" and hung up.

I went to the police as i felt uneasy about it all but they were not interested as no one was injured.

I complied with everything my insurance company asked for, forms, diagrams, taking the car to be checked etc, my car got written off.

 

Last month i recieved a letter from my insurer with a copy of the statement given my the other party, it includes a fully fabricated conversation i had where i allegedly appologised and said i was late for a school meeting, and in actual fact i was 10 mins early for a night class - not that he was told that! He also alleged that i had hit his passenger side when we were driving in opposite directions driver to driver, i checked his car immediately after the incident and it was mildly scuffed just under his lights on the driver back corner.

 

My insurer said that it looks like a 50/50 split and i'm not at all happy with that, i've had to pay £800+ on a new car as they gave me pittance for my old car and if it goes to a 50/50 split then i will loose my no claims which will add further expense. My insurer said that theres an option to take the case to court where an independant person will hear both sides and determine who is telling the truth but will that cost me to go that route?

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, where there is no proof either way, an insurer will settle 50/50.

 

I appreciate what you say about other people saying he was using his mobile, but it does not prove the cause of the accident.

 

The best you could hope for is to get statements from people saying that he was in the same place when they passed him, which might go some way to proving he could not have hit you coming from the opposite direction.

You could also get some proof that you were in the college when you said you were, which might disprove the content of his statement.

 

I'm not too sure what your insurer means when they say an independent person can hear the case in court. That sounds to me like a basic court case, which is usually done where there is a reasonable chance of winning.

 

Start getting some factual statements from other people and see what information is in there that may help disprove what the other person said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...