Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dvla Penalty For Car Sold In Dec08


odezi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5355 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All

 

I sold my car in December in 2008 and as far as I am aware I sent DVLA all the information required. As I didn't hear anything from them I assumed all was fine until I received correspondence from them that my car did not have any tax and I needed to purchase one. They also fined me. I sent them a letter informing them that the car was sold in December and also nsent them confirmation of the sale. The replied and confirmed the fine of £40 and said it had to be paid by a certain time or the fine will be increased. They have now sent a letter increasing the fine to £80.

 

I would like some advice on the best way to proceed with the DVLA from anyone that has experienced this from them before.

 

Many thanks

 

Graham

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear All

 

I sold my car in December in 2008 and as far as I am aware I sent DVLA all the information required. As I didn't hear anything from them I assumed all was fine until I received correspondence from them that my car did not have any tax and I needed to purchase one. They also fined me. I sent them a letter informing them that the car was sold in December and also nsent them confirmation of the sale. The replied and confirmed the fine of £40 and said it had to be paid by a certain time or the fine will be increased. They have now sent a letter increasing the fine to £80.

 

I would like some advice on the best way to proceed with the DVLA from anyone that has experienced this from them before.

 

Many thanks

 

Graham

 

I would start be reading through other threads in this section; you will find the answer there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Still getting harrassed by Moorcroft about this fine. They have sent me letter from their precourt division and also called me to pay and if I do not they will commence legal proceedings. They also claimed that after selling the car I should have asked for a refund of my road tax, that is the way DVLA will know I have sold it. I told them that the tax had 2 days left and as far as I was aware, all I needed to do was send V5C, which I did. Moorcroft are becoming a real pain, real pain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SThey also claimed that after selling the car I should have asked for a refund of my road tax, that is the way DVLA will know I have sold it.

 

Utter b*llocks!

 

There is

 

a) no requirement to surrender the tax disk when selling a car, and

b) such surrender does not notify DVLA that a vehicle has been sold

 

The only way to notify a change of keeper is to send the updates V5C to DVLA, obtaining proof of postage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I sent it by normal post. I am planning to write to DVLA again about this and also complain about the harrassment by Moorcroft. They have called twice this week and also left one message.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been looking through the letters from DVLA and I am a little confused. I received a letter in April confirming that the late penalty notice was valid. This was in reply to my letter informing them that I was disputing the charge. At the beginning of May they sent me an acknowledgement letter that I was no longer the registered keeper. Should they have sent this since they claimed not to have received the V5C? Is it not the V5C that generates the automated letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been looking through the letters from DVLA and I am a little confused. I received a letter in April confirming that the late penalty notice was valid. This was in reply to my letter informing them that I was disputing the charge. At the beginning of May they sent me an acknowledgement letter that I was no longer the registered keeper. Should they have sent this since they claimed not to have received the V5C? Is it not the V5C that generates the automated letter?

 

No, the acknowledgement letter in May is just that they have updated the database from your April letter, from April.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Odezi,

 

I had exactly this with a car I sold (well, gave away) in Dec 07. It must be a Christmas thang ;)

 

Anyway, to save a lot of re-typing, the approach I took and letters I sent are all on this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dvla/171156-dvla-intercredit-again.html

 

Note that Moorcroft wre easy to get rid of. As soon as you tell them that the alleged debt they're trying to recover is in dispute and that you require them to refer it back to DVLA they really have no choice but to do so. If they continue to chase after you've notified them of that then they are harassing you.

 

Wiuth DVLA keep all letters concise, polite, and don't get drawn into "arguing" with them. Simply keep telling them that, f they want to recover this alleged debt, they have to prove to the satisfaction of a court that the debt is owed.

 

By their own response to FOI requests (linked in the other thread) they "don't need" an official appeal system because everyone they levy these fines against has the right to have it determined by court and all you're doing is trying to excercise that right ;)

 

There is a slight risk that they'll actually go through with court action but even if they do there's a very good chance they won't actually turn up to claim.

 

Sadly, in my case, I've heard absolutely nothing from them since about Feb this year so I can't give a 100% definate outcome - but it's way too long for them to successfully start proceedings now. I suspect that's a normal result because the last thing they need is for a case to actually go through against them on this ;)

:!:Nothing I post should be taken as legal advice. It is offered as an opinion only.:!:

 

This warning is in my signature because I'm not organised enough to remember to type

it in every post.

 

And you're considering trusting me????:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spunkymonkey, many thanks for the posting.

 

I sent the letter beloow to the DVLA and they have replied that I am still liable for the £80 charge

 

 

I write with regards to the letter from your agency dated 27 May 2009 and subsequent telephone conversations with your appointed Debt Collection Agent and letters from them regarding the late licensing penalty on vehicle registration xxxxxxx.

 

As stated in my previous correspondence to the agency, the vehicle was sold to webuymycar in December 2008. I immediately sent the required documents as required by law. At that point, my duty under the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994 to notify a change of keeper was discharged and so the provisions of Regulation 22 of the Road Vehicles (Registration and Licensing) Regulations, under which the disputed Penalty Charge arise, cannot apply.

 

I am neither responsible, nor liable, for any failure by the DVLA to update their records in accordance with the information I supplied to them when disposing of the vehicle. I fully understand that the DVLA have a responsibility to maintain the Continuous Registration records for millions of vehicles and appreciate that these penalty charges are a valuable tool to that end. However, unless they can clearly demonstrate that I failed to submit the change of keeper details - which is impossible because I did submit them - the charge is not enforceable.

 

I therefore require you to immediately recall the alleged debt from Moorcroft Debt Recovery and to refrain from any further attempt at collection until and unless you have proved liability in the County Court. I also urge you to cancel the charge forthwith and look forward to your confirmation of this.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

 

I inted to follow it up with a letter and ask them to forward the case for prosecution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...