Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA sold to Experto - no CCA


LB145
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4919 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

CMC5 Standard template is farcical!

 

 

They are stating what their "investigations team" have established!!

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 358
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi All

 

I received a letter from Experto Credite to make a payment on MBNA credit card. I would not go into detail but I am in the same boat as everybody else. No CCa no SAR nothing and refusing that they have any request from me . Anyway I rang experto and the man was not very helpful instead threating and I have told him unless i see anything solid from MBNA i would not discuss the matter further and he said that ok i get that sent to you but once we have done that we will be demanding full payment straightway blah bah.

Their letter states that they know where Am I? what I do? and where Am I hiding from them blah blah

It is quite scary .

please help as i am upset and have no money to pay ........

IVA Bankruptcy and debit managment all beyond me as i am unable to afford any of these.

urgent help please

Hussy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hussy,

firstly don't ring these "people" up and use that term very loosely.

The whole point of a DCA is to try and squeeze every penny they can from you. For this reason NEVER phone them if they wish to lie and tell you untruths let them do it in writing. Exspurto send silly text messages and phone up even when told not to. The good news is that it's probably unenforceable as these monkeys buy them cheap.

 

Do you have a default notice from MBN@? Does it ask for the full amount? Have they given the correct amount of time? Start a thread in the MBN@ forum you will get loads of help, people here love mbn@. If you can scan your letters up remove any personal info though.

 

Have you sent a CCA request and SAR to MBN@?

 

Pumpytums

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent letter to MBNA informing them that it has been 91 days since they received my SAR request acknowledged by them on 1st & 5th March promising to resolve by 2nd April!!!!!!

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

Off to the ICO then

 

Hi Vint - please elaborate for me and any others (of whom there are many) that may be in the same situation - thx

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent a letter before action to MBN@? That should also perk them up.

 

Pumpytums

 

Yes sent a letter to MBNA no response back yet - although Experto has started phoning all the numbers again - even my mobile - this is my OH's account.

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry not updated recently needed to help friends with personal issues (very time consuming especially when you haven't got much of it - but us Caggers know we all need good advice and support :D)

 

Still no information re SAR from MBNA we are way past 100 days now!!!

 

REceived another letter from Experto - "despite our attempts to contact you in relation to the above matter, we have yet to receive direct contact with you, by telephone or correspondence" followed by the usual rubbish of your account is registered at the Credit Bureay, you will have trouble obtaining credit inthe future blah blah blah - um err... was those the phone calls when I told them to "read your correspondence that has been signed for" and promptly put the phone down.

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

Experto sending text messages to my phone - told them on many occassions this is not my other halfs phone number!

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Still not heard a thing since early March!

 

Tempting fate! ;)

 

Hi Dotty - good to hear from you - Still no response from SAR request - have been really busy and have finally sent complaint to ICO - very straightforward - emailed rather than posted just more scanning of documents! :eek: This is the link below if needed. Experto are still calling my mobile, sendign texts etc. Will try to send another letter of to them tomorrow.

 

My other MBNA is in court soon for SJ hearing - fingers crossed and everything else for that matter that I keep my head and talk without tripping over my own words! :eek::eek::eek:

If not contact the Information Commissioner`s Office (Information Commissioners Office )

 

Complaints - Access to Information and Personal Information Rights - Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)

 

 

user_offline.gifreputation.gif report.gif

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LB,

 

Wonder if ICO will be as efficient in responding to you!

 

I hope your other case goes ok, I really dread anything landing on my mat from court but there just doesn't seem to be any pattern or reasoning why people are singled out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 letters arrived today from Experto!!!

 

Letter 1 - "I write further to your recent correspondence. As we have no contact telephone number for you, please call me directly on ******* that we can discuss the content of your letter in detail."

 

Letter 2: Exactly the same as Letter 1

 

Letter 3: "I write further with regards to unanswered previous correspondence.

 

MBNA have informed us that any requests regarding SAR or copy agreement was declined as the same was dealt with earlier last year when originally requested.

 

They have also informed us that you stated the debt would not be paid unless a full and final settlement was accepted, which it was not and no figure was mentioned anyway.

 

Please not that should we not hear from you by return with regards to you immediate proposals to settle your liability , we will be left no option than to instruct our solicitors to issue you with a statutory demand and you will then have 21 days to pay the above balance in full" their spelling errors not mine!

With regard to the full and final settlement - they MBNA sent a letter regarding a partial settlement and followed with a call - not normally speaking with them on the phone my daughter actually passed the call onto me and it was stated that a Partial settlement would not be acceptable as the debt would still be recorded on file - it ws stated that their would be not partial settlement only a full and final if we agreed the amount! MBNA then sent a letter regarding Partial settlement and a date to settle - there was only one phone conversation and the letter was not replied to as it did not offer the Full & Final !

Any comments?

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

So good old Exspurto show their true colours what a complete bunch of muppets. Issuing a SD is a complete abuse of process, it can easily be set aside.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/258608-capquest-have-issued-statutory.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/155477-sd-received-post-day-3.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/260863-statutory-demand-cap-quest.html

 

If they send you one contact postggj he is great with them.

 

The other good news is that you will probably get costs £300ish.

 

 

Firstly Exspurto cannot issue a correct SD as they do not own the debt have they ever sent a NOA saying they own it? Nope it's good old Varde.

 

Statutory demand generally used as a bluffing technique, why issue a SD when you can simply take someone to court and get the lot + costs. They still have to prove they are entitled so the CCA, DN etc all have to be in order.

 

Our "special" friends usually issue these when they get a whiff of a settlement offer.

 

Have a look at postggj threads especially the one he answers to.

 

If you get a SD it will probably come from Fairfax sols their "tool" of choice.

 

One more thing have MBN@ sent you £10 back for the SAR they wont be sending you.

 

The relevant act is as follows:

 

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1998/ukpga_19980029_en_3#pt2-l1g7

 

I don't believe they can refuse to send your SAR.

 

I hope this helps.

 

 

Pumpytums

Edited by pumpytums
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Pumpy I will have a read when I get a moment - much appreciated.

 

no £10 has not been refunded or any indication from MBNA that they were refusing to send it. Also no CCA has been sent only the Applicatin Form several times again and again - still this is not a CCA!

 

DN was faulty and debt was almost probaly sold to Varde prior to the settlement date on the DN as their letter came dated the next day - probably the reason that they are refusing the SAR request!?!

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing LB145,

did you send the SAR to MBN@ or Explurto Clowneqie?

 

Pumpytums

 

Requests sent to MBNA -previously requested May/June 09 they sent package on 10th September 09 obviously things progressed and I sent a second request Feb 2010 to get the latest info kept on file! Both with £10.00 PO of course

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LB

 

I see pumpytums has given you some links regarding SD's, I was reading some threads about these recently and at first sound a little alarming but you then see that it seems to be another scare tactic!

 

I know we are always advised not to call but wonder if you should contact the data controller, in order to get your SAR. As you say maybe they don't want to send the later information because it will give you the evidence of UR.

 

Don't really know what else to suggest, sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would consider writing a letter to Exspurto again acknowledging no debt to them and simply ask why are they replying to the SAR request you sent to MBN@. The muppets at EC have absolutely zero input in this and to be frank it's none of their business. I would then get in touch with the ICO and report MBN@ for their breach.

 

 

Read up on the SD, and just familiarise yourself with them and the process at getting them set-aside. It's pretty straight forward and postggj loves to help with them. He is great. One more thing if EC are stupid enough to get their solicitors to send a SD once it's set aside they can never pull the same trick again.

 

One more thing LB, just check out the following link:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/261741-statutory-demand-sos-can.html#post2969044

 

The Claimant was put as Varde but with Heidi they tried the trick of Pre-dating it then posting it to her which is very naughty indeed.

 

Pumpytums

Edited by pumpytums
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pumpy - thanks for the input have been reading throught the SD links you suggested - and trying to get my head around it - I never realised that an SD is the start of bankruptcy - this acct is my husbands and it is now OVER £18K - we are both self employed and home owners (MORTGAGE) - so I suppose this is their scare tactics! Will send a letter to 'Experto today if I can get my computer sorted - my computer has freaked out and shut down on me telling me that my windows is not activated - probably a virus :mad:- fortunately my son has left his laptop at home and found it whilst clearing the crap left in his room!so I am able to post on here

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never heard of Exspurto actually seeing a SD through they have issued them though. Just something to be mindful of, it's an old trick that most DCA's have grown out of. As Exspurto cannot even seem write yet though it's no surprise they resort to such Kindergarten games.

 

Pumpytums

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I haven't writen to Experto since last letter as been busy on other thread - today phone call to house - told him OH not in - starts going on about not responding to letters - get husband to ring - told him that wont happen doesnt get in till late - next thing my mobile ring "Oh Mrs ? your answering your husbands mobile as well" No this is my mobile I reply stop calling it - he wont answer it as its not his -" WILL KEEP CALLING UNTIL HE REPLIES AND GIVES US ANOTHER NUMBER"

 

eXTREMELY RUDE AND NEVER EVEN ASKED WHO i

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...