Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Another GE Money Insurance Question


Guest suziedarkness
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5430 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest suziedarkness

This is not actually a PPI policy but I thought this would be the best place to start.

 

I recently received a SARN from GE Money on a mortgage that was paid up 18 months ago.

 

I noticed on the underwriting sheet that there was a Life policy taken out by myself for £3,000. This was news to me as I would never have taken out such a thing with them.

 

Anyway, to cut a long story short, There was another piece of paper included in the SARN which suggested the name of the Insurance co the policy was with, so I phoned them. I explained to the lady that this policy was taken out in 2005 but I had no knowledge of it, nor ever received any confirmation or documentation. After searching every which way she could think of, she told me they had no knowledge of me whatsoever, they had never issued a policy for me at all. I got her to confirm this in an email to me.

 

I then phoned GE and asked them to confirm who the policy was with. They gave me the very name and phone number of the company that I had just rung.

 

Something was starting to smell very fishy!!!! It is my suspicion that they put this thing in as acover up maybe. Perhaps to cover up a secret commission or something.

 

Anyhow, I then wrote to GE telling them I had been advised by the INs co that they had never heard of me and certainly never issued a policy. I asked them to send me a poliucy number or policy document or a good explanation as to why I had paid out £3,000 for a policy that appeared to be non-existent. I gave them 14 days to get back to me before I took further action.

 

As is true to form with GE, it has now been 3 weeks and not a dicky bird from them.

 

Anyone got any ideas as to where I should go next? Demand a refund from them maybe or go to FOS?

 

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello suzie,

 

This is not actually a PPI policy but I thought this would be the best place to start.

 

I recently received a SARN from GE Money on a mortgage that was paid up 18 months ago.

 

I noticed on the underwriting sheet that there was a Life policy taken out by myself for £3,000. This was news to me as I would never have taken out such a thing with them.

 

Anyway, to cut a long story short, There was another piece of paper included in the SARN which suggested the name of the Insurance co the policy was with, so I phoned them. I explained to the lady that this policy was taken out in 2005 but I had no knowledge of it, nor ever received any confirmation or documentation. After searching every which way she could think of, she told me they had no knowledge of me whatsoever, they had never issued a policy for me at all. I got her to confirm this in an email to me.

 

I then phoned GE and asked them to confirm who the policy was with. They gave me the very name and phone number of the company that I had just rung.

 

Something was starting to smell very fishy!!!! It is my suspicion that they put this thing in as acover up maybe. Perhaps to cover up a secret commission or something.

 

Anyhow, I then wrote to GE telling them I had been advised by the INs co that they had never heard of me and certainly never issued a policy. I asked them to send me a poliucy number or policy document or a good explanation as to why I had paid out £3,000 for a policy that appeared to be non-existent. I gave them 14 days to get back to me before I took further action.

 

As is true to form with GE, it has now been 3 weeks and not a dicky bird from them.

 

Anyone got any ideas as to where I should go next? Demand a refund from them maybe or go to FOS?

 

Suzie

 

I would go down the route of Subject Access Request with the £10.00 fee and when you request all of the data be especially specific on asking for a Copy of the life policy document they quoted. This gives them the statutory 8 weeks to respond with the relevent information failure to produce the policy document within the 8 weeks then IMO straight to the FOS with a complaint and copies of all the relevent correspondence, including the email response from the insurance company stating they have no record of either you or the policy.

 

Could it just be that the Policy you paid for was in fact allegedly bogus and never existed hence no documentation ever being received and no records held by the insurance company in question.:eek:

 

Hope this helps

 

I know the FOS is the long way round but there is no cost other than getting the stuff delivered to them by special delivery.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

Thanks aa.

 

I have already SAR them, thats how I found out there was a life policy. It took me nearly 6 months and intervention with the ICO to get them to comply with my SAR request.

 

Like I said above, I have quizzed them about it but no response from them at all and my deadline has passed.

 

Like you say, maybe the FSO is the best route, albeit longwinded. I have found lots of little dirty discrepancies with the accounts I had with them since receiving my SAR so maybe they can deal with them altogether!! :):)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks aa.

 

I have already SAR them, thats how I found out there was a life policy. It took me nearly 6 months and intervention with the ICO to get them to comply with my SAR request.

 

Like I said above, I have quizzed them about it but no response from them at all and my deadline has passed.

 

Like you say, maybe the FSO is the best route, albeit longwinded. I have found lots of little dirty discrepancies with the accounts I had with them since receiving my SAR so maybe they can deal with them altogether!! :-):-) Yesterday 17:52

 

 

I stumbled upon this on another site.

 

'I am writing in response to your letter dated 24/03/09 with regards to the insurance sold with my House of Fraser store card.Your reference is ****.

 

I do not feel your letter has offered a satisfactory justification that my policy was sold fairly, reasonably and within my best interests so I request that you look into my complaint again. If I do not receive a more favorable response within 14 days I shall be taking my complaint to the Finance and Leasing Association (as advised by you) and if they are unable to assist with my complaint in a satisfactory and timely manner I will go on to seek my resolution through litigation.

 

I understand that my credit agreement was before the FSA’s ICOB regulations came into force. However, having read the FSA’s damning assessment (available at FSA fines GE Capital Bank) of the practices of GE Money from 14 January 2005 and onwards, I believe a court would determine that these were also standard practices before GE Money was under the regulation of the FSA and would award in my favor.

 

As previously stated, I hope to receive a more favorable response within 14 days of this letter.

 

The general gist of things here is that GE have been fined by the FSA and are really reluctant to pay back all they owe so more complaints to the FSA may just do the trick:eek:

 

Have a look at all the links on this google search of GE and there is a lot of information on a lot of potential links.

 

ge fined by the fsa - Google Search

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

Thats a fantastic letter aa, thank you for passing that on.

 

One question though, just so I know how to adapt the letter. I understand that GE were not authorised until 2004 sometime. This loan was taken out in Oct 2004. Were they authorised then, but probably more importantly, would their authorisation apply in this case because its not ex\actly a case of misselling, more a case of possible fraud?

 

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a fantastic letter aa, thank you for passing that on.

 

One question though, just so I know how to adapt the letter. I understand that GE were not authorised until 2004 sometime. This loan was taken out in Oct 2004. Were they authorised then, but probably more importantly, would their authorisation apply in this case because its not ex\actly a case of misselling, more a case of possible fraud?

 

Suzie

 

This is a link to the FSA register.

 

FSA Register

 

When you open the link type in the ge money in the firm name window and hit the submit button. This will bring up all the results for ge money. All the red names on the left are further links and when you open the appropriate one there will be yet more links at the top and one will be regulators. I think you will find that some ge money links are regulated by the FSA since Oct 2004 but you will need to check out which of the ge money addresses is the right one to match your paperwork.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest suziedarkness

AA, as this "policy" was supposedly taken out when I remortgaged, what would you claim as interest? Would you claim back the mortgage rate charged or the 8%.

 

They have a lot to answer for. They repo'd my home 18 months ago.

 

Suzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

AA, as this "policy" was supposedly taken out when I remortgaged, what would you claim as interest? Would you claim back the mortgage rate charged or the 8%.

 

They have a lot to answer for. They repo'd my home 18 months ago.

 

Suzie

 

 

IMO you should claim the PPI and the interest on that PPI at whatever rate they charged at the time. Then on top I would also ask for the 8% statutory interest from the start of the mortgage up until any settlement is agreed through the FOS or the Courts.

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...